Index › GTM › Customer › Feedback › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Customer feedback and surveys for small business buyers

Asked as “customer feedback and survey platform”, and as “NPS and customer experience survey tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 65 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Google Forms 14%
15SurveyMonkey14Google Forms12Delighted58others

15% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SurveyMonkey (15%) replaces Google Forms (17% then, 14% now), 1 point clear, inside the 11-point floor.SurveyMonkey leads at 15%, replacing Google Forms, which led at 17% and stands at 14% now: 1 point clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SurveyMonkey15%31%59criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 15%
02Google Forms Lab in the set14%10%42accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 14%
03Delighted12%13%23accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%
04Typeform11%19%59accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%
05Survicate11%5%37accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 11%
06SurveySparrow11%3%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%
07Zonka Feedback3%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%
08CustomerGauge3%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Medallia Experience Cloud0%93%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Qualtrics CustomerXM0%88%32criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Hotjar0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12HubSpot Service Hub0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Jotform0%4%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Canny0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Forms is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models nine times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01SurveyMonkey15%
02Google Forms14%
03Delighted12%
04Typeform11%
05Survicate11%
06SurveySparrow11%
07Zonka Feedback3%
08CustomerGauge3%
09Jotform0%
10Canny0%
11Hotjar0%
12HubSpot Service Hub0%
13Medallia Experience Cloud0%
14Qualtrics CustomerXM0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Qualtrics CustomerXM
88%
28 of 32 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid or exercise strong caution with these platforms and categories: ... Enterprise Heavyweights (Overkill and Exorbitant) * Platforms: Qualtrics” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
SurveyMonkey
31%
18 of 59 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“avoid enterprise suites such as Qualtrics/Medallia and data-paywalled free tiers from SurveyMonkey/Typeform” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Medallia Experience Cloud
93%
14 of 15 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Avoid heavy enterprise solutions like Qualtrics CX or Medallia unless you have dedicated operations staff to manage them.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Typeform
19%
11 of 59 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Popular Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... notoriously strict and expensive for small budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 786 links across 216 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · SurveySparrow32 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Frill27 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CustomerGauge22 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra22 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Software Advice17 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Spotsaas17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Typeform14 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · QuestionPro13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 14 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer feedback and survey platform”, “customer feedback and survey platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
SurveyMonkey surveymonkey.com15%214165,0002,0231,683,535$5001062
Google parent site
Google Forms 14%
14%911,830,00015,495
Delighted qualtrics.com12%3540,50023,3751,028,410$2166
Typeform typeform.com11%16060,500584292,052$31433
Survicate survicate.com11%59720823,06606
SurveySparrow surveysparrow.com11%741,90017246,819431
Retently retently.com5%1132024,3335,5241
Zonka Feedback zonkafeedback.com3%46140256,66803
Tally tally.so3%1440,50010,35832,8710
Nicereply nicereply.com3%8140014,5100

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, surveysparrow.com). The first result for “best customer feedback and survey platform” is surveysparrow.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best customer feedback and survey platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which NPS and customer experience survey tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top customer feedback and survey platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer feedback and survey platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a customer feedback and survey platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer feedback and survey platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CustomerGauge
Four alternativesAlchemer, SurveyMonkey, Zoho Survey, Zonka Feedback
Delighted, SurveySparrowChanged
Two alternativesGetFeedback, Typeform
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM
SurveyMonkey
Five alternativesJotform, SurveySparrow, Survicate, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
Google Forms, SurveySparrow, Typeform
Two alternativesJotform, ProProfs Survey Maker
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniDelighted, Survicate
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: Google Forms
SurveyMonkeyChanged
Two alternativesAskNicely, Retently
SurveyMonkey
Five alternativesCanny, Delighted, Google Forms, Hotjar, Typeform
Google Forms, QuestionProagainst: Delighted, Survicate, Typeformno first choiceagainst: ChurnZero, Gainsight, GetFeedback, InMoment, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Trustpilot, Typeform
Gemini 3.5 FlashTypeform
Five alternativesDelighted, HubSpot Service Hub, Jotform, SurveyMonkey, Survicate
RetentlyChanged
Four alternativesDelighted, HubSpot Service Hub, Simplesat, Survicate
Tally
Five alternativesGoogle Forms, Hotjar, Jotform, Survicate, Typeform
Tally
Three alternativesFillout, Google Forms, Survicate
against: Jotform, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Delighted, Survicate
Nine alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Jotform, PostHog, Refiner, Sprig, SurveySparrow, Typeform, Usersnap, Zendesk Feedback
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics Core
against: Gainsight, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Sprinklr, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Perplexity SonarSurveyMonkey
Four alternativesCanny, Front, HubSpot Service Hub, Typeform
against: CustomerGauge
HubSpot Customer Feedback SoftwareChanged
Two alternativesSurveyMonkey, Survicate
against: CustomerGauge
Typeform
Seven alternativesCanny, Frill, Google Forms, Jotform, Nicereply, SurveyMonkey, Survicate
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveySparrow
Google Forms
Two alternativesSurveyMonkey, Typeform
no first choiceagainst: Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Contentsquare, Hotjar, Mopinion, Podium, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Trustpilot, Typeform
Grok 4.20SurveySparrow
Five alternativesCustomerGauge, Google Forms, Jotform, Survicate, Typeform
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey
SurvicateChanged
Three alternativesDelighted, SurveySparrow, Typeform
Google Forms, Typeform
Six alternativesCanny, Hotjar, HubSpot Service Hub, SurveyMonkey, Userback, Zonka Feedback
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Google Forms
Eight alternativesHotjar, Microsoft Forms, SoGoSurvey, SurveyMonkey, SurveySensum, Survicate, Typeform, Zoho Forms
Typeform
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: Google Forms, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: Alchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, Pendo, Qualaroo, Qualtrics CustomerXM, QuestionPro, Sitejabber, SurveyMonkey, Trustpilot, UserVoice, Yelp
Mistral SmallSurveyMonkey, Typeform
One alternativeZonka Feedback
against: Google Forms
Delighted, NicereplyChanged
Three alternativesSurvicate, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
no first choiceSurveyMonkey
Four alternativesGoogle Forms, Hotjar, SurveySparrow, Typeform
no first choiceagainst: Delighted, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Yext
DeepSeek V4 FlashSurveySparrow
Three alternativesJotform, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
against: CustomerGauge, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
DelightedChanged
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: CustomerGauge
SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Three alternativesGoogle Forms, SurveySparrow, Zoho Survey
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM
Google Forms, SurveySparrow
Three alternativesJotform, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
SurveyMonkey
Five alternativesDelighted, SurveySparrow, Typeform, Wootric, Zoho Survey
against: Google Forms, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, SurveyWorld, Zonka Feedback
Llama 4 Mavericksurveysparrow.comRetentlyChanged
Four alternativesSurveyLegend, Survicate, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
SurveyMonkey
Ten alternativesAskNicely, HelpDesk by LiveChat, Jotform, QuestionPro, SmartSurvey, SurveySensum, SurveySparrow, Survicate, Typeform, Zoho Forms
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM
SurveyMonkey
Three alternativesGoogle Forms, Jotform, SurveySparrow
no first choiceagainst: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Qwen 3.7 FlashSurvicate
Four alternativesCanny, HubSpot Surveys, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Zonka FeedbackChanged
Three alternativesDelighted, SurveySparrow, Survicate
Delighted, Typeform
Six alternativesCanny, Feathr, Google Forms, Jotform, Satisforest, Zonka Feedback
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey
Google Forms
Four alternativesJotform, Microsoft Forms, ProProfs Survey Maker, Zoho Survey
against: Typeform
Delighted, Medallion, Survicate
Two alternativesTally, Typeform
against: Oracle/Omniture, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: Birdeye, Medallia Experience Cloud, Podium, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Reputation, SurveyMonkey, Yext
Kimi K2Typeform, Zonka Feedback
Two alternativesSatismeter, Survicate
against: CustomerGauge, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
DelightedChanged
Three alternativesCustomerGauge, SurveyMonkey, Survicate
Typeform
Five alternativesDelighted, Google Forms, Hotjar, Jotform, SurveySparrow
Google Forms, forms.app
Three alternativesSendPulse, SurveySensum, Zoho Forms
against: SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Survicate
Four alternativesCanny, Frill, Hotjar, SurveySparrow
against: Alchemer, Birdeye, Medallia Experience Cloud, Podium, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, Voxco
GLM 4.7 FlashXSurveyMonkey, Typeform
Three alternativesCustomerGauge, Survicate, Zonka Feedback
SurveySparrowChanged
Three alternativesSurveyMonkey, SurveySensum, Typeform
SurveyMonkey, Zoho Survey
Six alternativesAlchemer, AskNicely, Canny, Jotform, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
Google Forms
Five alternativesMailpro, SurveySensum, SurveySparrow, Tally, Typeform
against: SurveyMonkey
no first choiceagainst: Alchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, Numerator Verified Voices, Pinecone Research, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyCake, SurveyMonkey, SurveyPlanet
MiniMax M2.5Savio
Four alternativesCustomerGauge, SurveySensum, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrowChanged
Two alternativesSurveyNinja, Survicate
against: CustomerGauge
SurveyMonkey, Typeform
One alternativeGoogle Forms
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM
Google Forms
One alternativeSurveySensum
no first choiceagainst: Dynata, Survey Junkie, SurveyMonkey, Trustpilot, Typeform
GPT-6 LunaSurvicate
One alternativePostHog
against: HubSpot Service Hub
RetentlyChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Survicate
Google Forms, Tally
Three alternativesContentsquare Voice of Customer, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
against: Survicate
Tally
Two alternativesGoogle Forms, Zoho Survey
SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Two alternativesAlchemer, Survicate
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Trustpilot
Muse Glimmer 30BCustomerGauge
Four alternativesSurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow, Typeform, Zonka Feedback
against: Delighted
Delighted, NicereplyChanged
One alternativeCustomerGauge
Google Forms
Seven alternativesHotjar, Qualaroo, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow, Survicate, Typeform, Zendesk
SurveyMonkey
Six alternativesGoogle Forms, Google Workspace, Mailpro, ProProfs Survey Maker, SurveySparrow, Zoho Survey
no first choiceagainst: Medallia Experience Cloud, Pollfish, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Sitejabber, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:06yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:39yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:27no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:30yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:52yes1011 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:17yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:10yes2430 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:05yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:00yes523 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:19yes1543 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:59yes1445 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:32yes531 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:40yes318 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:30yes1526 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:17no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:02yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:16no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:00yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:06yes911 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:31yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:18yes2525 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:15yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:54yes528 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:20yes1024 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:06yes2041 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:02yes523 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:57yes318 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:28yes1224 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:58yes109 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:20yes59 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:40no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:31yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:29yes517 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:20yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:48yes2331 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:48yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:35yes1440 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:48yes2027 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:50yes1926 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:19yes1018 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:25yes619 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:15yes1430 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:53yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:02yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:00no013 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:03yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:13yes510 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:10yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:54yes2346 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:17yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:50yes1048 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:36yes943 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:30yes1378 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:01yes516 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:01yes315 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:31yes1324 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:07no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:27no04 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:28no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:30yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:16yes516 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:14no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:38yes2029 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:29yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:52no025 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:22yes1030 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:28yes1831 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:21no014 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:21yes517 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:36yes1519 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:44yes1910 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:06yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:34yes1019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:40yes106 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:17yes1515 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:37yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:09yes2534 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:12yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:21yes525 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:36yes2533 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:16yes24131 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:27yes2439 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:27yes416 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:25yes2532 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Service Hub
Medallia read as Medallia Experience Cloud
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Zoho read as Zoho Survey
Unresolved, counted raw
Contentsquare Voice of Customer
Customer Thermometer
Customer.guru
Emojics
Feathr
GoZen Forms
HubSpot Customer Feedback Software
HubSpot Surveys
Interaction Metrics
Medallion
Oracle/Omniture
Qualtrics Core
RaveCapture
Satisforest
SurveyCake
SurveyNinja
SurveyWorld
Zendesk Feedback
Zigpoll
surveysparrow.com
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Customer educationCustomer success →