Brand protection platforms for small business buyers
Asked as “brand protection platform”, and as “tool to take down counterfeits and brand impersonation”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Red Points 23%
32IP Moat23Red Points09Brand Protector36others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (32%) replaces Red Points (37% then, 23% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.IP Moat leads at 32%, replacing Red Points, which led at 37% and stands at 23% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
IP Moat32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (32%) replaces Red Points (37% then, 23% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketIP Moat23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (23%) replaces Red Points (40% then, 17% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Red Points53%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
IP Moat32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (32%) replaces Red Points (37% then, 23% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketIP Moat23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (23%) replaces Red Points (40% then, 17% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseRed Points53%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01IP Moat32%0%36endorsed leader▲+17Since October 2026: 15% → 32%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.15% → 32%
IP Moat32%0%36endorsed leader▲+17Since October 2026: 15% → 32%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.15% → 32%02Red Points23%19%62accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 37% → 23%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.37% → 23%
Red Points23%19%62accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 37% → 23%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.37% → 23%03
BrandShield9%23%48accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 9%
BrandShield9%23%48accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 9%04
Brand Protector9%0%14accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
Brand Protector9%0%14accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%05
PriceSpider8%0%12accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
PriceSpider8%0%12accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%06
MarqVision2%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
MarqVision2%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Bolster2%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Bolster2%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Corsearch0%75%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Corsearch0%75%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
ZeroFox0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ZeroFox0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Netcraft0%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Netcraft0%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Google Alerts Lab in the set0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Google Alerts Lab in the set0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Alerts is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
IP Moat vs BolsterIP Moat vs MarqVisionIP Moat vs Fortra Brand ProtectionIP Moat vs CorsearchBrandShield vs Red PointsBrandShield vs Bolster AIBrandShield vs BolsterBrandShield vs MarqVisionBrandShield vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBrandShield vs CorsearchRed Points vs Bolster AIRed Points vs BolsterRed Points vs MarqVisionRed Points vs Fortra Brand ProtectionRed Points vs CorsearchBolster AI vs BolsterBolster AI vs MarqVisionBolster AI vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBolster AI vs CorsearchBolster vs MarqVisionBolster vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBolster vs CorsearchMarqVision vs Fortra Brand ProtectionMarqVision vs CorsearchFortra Brand Protection vs Corsearch
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01IP Moat32%
IP Moat32%02Red Points23%
Red Points23%03BrandShield9%
BrandShield9%04Brand Protector9%
Brand Protector9%05PriceSpider8%
PriceSpider8%06MarqVision2%
MarqVision2%07Bolster2%
Bolster2%08Netcraft0%
Netcraft0%09Google Alerts0%
Google Alerts0%10ZeroFox0%
ZeroFox0%11Corsearch0%
Corsearch0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BrandShield23%
11 of 48 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Most enterprise platforms (Red Points, MarqVision, BrandShield)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Corsearch75%
12 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Multiple 1-star reviews accusing the service of: Sending copyright infringement notices for genuine products... "fraudulent software"” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Red Points19%
12 of 62 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Most enterprise platforms (Red Points, MarqVision, BrandShield) require custom quotes” Kimi K2, budget prompt
ZeroFox38%
8 of 21 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“cautious about brand protection platforms that are enterprise-first... that includes platforms like ZeroFox and Cyble when small teams are concerned about false positives” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 877 links across 179 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 23 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Spotsaas39 answers · 59 citations · 12 models
37 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 64 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Netcraft28 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Red Points27 answers · 40 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · BrandShield21 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SourceForge18 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 10 models
36 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best brand protection platform”, “brand protection platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP Moat ipmoat.ai | 32% | 50 | 70 | 1 | 34 | $1,531 | 3 | |
| Red Points redpoints.com | 23% | 175 | 14,800 | 3,227 | 9,588 | 118 | 8 | |
| BrandShield brandshield.com BrandShield 9%, BrandShield - SMB Edition 2% | 11% | 151 | 720 | 48 | 1,117 | 24 | 1 | |
| Brand Protector brandprotector.io | 9% | 20 | ||||||
| PriceSpider pricespider.com | 8% | 15 | ||||||
| Bolster bolster.ai Bolster AI 2%, Bolster 2% | 4% | 46 | 60,500 | 4,591 | 42,916 | 7 | ||
| MarqVision marqvision.com | 2% | 48 | 720 | 22 | 2,500 | 11 | ||
| IPzest ipzest.app | 2% | 10 | ||||||
| Amazon parent site Amazon Brand Registry 2% | 2% | 11 | 151,000,000 | 1,380,939 | ||||
| nebty | 2% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brandshield.com, expertinsights.com, g2.com, netcraft.com, redpoints.com, sourceforge.net, thecmo.com). The first result for “best brand protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best brand protection platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to take down counterfeits and brand impersonation would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top brand protection platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best brand protection platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a brand protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which brand protection platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choicePriceSpider, Red Pointsno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Corsearch, Erase.com
Three alternatives
BrandShield, IP Moat, PhishEyeSeven alternatives
Bolster AI, MarqVision, Netcraft, Red Points, Spikerz, Tracer, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
IP Moat, Smart ProtectionGPT-5.4 miniBrandShieldBrand Protector, UpGuardChangedRed Pointsagainst: Corsearch Brand ProtectionIP Moatno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, Cyble, Doppel, Netcraft, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Red Points, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Amazon Brand Registry, Project ZeroFour alternatives
BrandShield, IP Moat, Netcraft, ZeroFoxOne alternative
BrandShieldGemini 3.5 FlashBolster AIagainst: CSC Digital Brand Services, Corsearch, MarqVisionRed PointsChangedMarqVision, Red Pointsagainst: Corsearch, OpSecMarqVisionagainst: Corsearch, OpSec, ZeroFoxRed Pointsagainst: Clarivate, Corsearch, OpSec Securityagainst: Clarivate, Corsearch, OpSec Security, Recorded Future, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
BrandShield, Netcraft, Red PointsThree alternatives
Alibaba IPP, BrandShield, MarqVisionThree alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Obscuryn / PhishFenceSix alternatives
Amazon Brand Registry, Bolster AI, BrandShield, DMCA.com, Project Zero, Red PointsFive alternatives
Bolster AI, BrandShield, MarqVision, PhishLabs, ZeroFoxPerplexity SonarBrandShieldRed PointsChangedBrand Protectoragainst: BrandVerity, CorsearchPriceSpideragainst: BrandShieldno first choiceagainst: Bolster, BrandShield, BrandVerity, CSC, Corsearch, Fortra Brand Protection, MarkMonitor, Netcraft, PhishLabs, Red Points, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
BrandVerity, Netcraft, Red PointsOne alternative
BrandShieldFour alternatives
BrandShield, MarqVision, Netcraft, Red PointsThree alternatives
MarqVision, Netcraft, Red PointsGrok 4.20nebtyagainst: BrandShieldRed PointsChangedRed PointsIP Moatno first choiceagainst: Incopro, MarkMonitor, Red Points
One alternative
Red PointsFive alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Netcraft, Tracer, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Doppel, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Red Points, Remove.tech, nebtyMistral SmallPriceSpiderIP MoatChangedMarqVision, Red Pointsagainst: AppdetexIP Moat, IPzestno first choiceagainst: Red Points
Two alternatives
Appdetex, Red PointsThree alternatives
BrandShield, MarqVision, Red PointsThree alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch Brand Protection, PriceSpiderOne alternative
Brand ProtectorDeepSeek V4 FlashIP MoatIP MoatHeldIP Moatagainst: Red PointsIP Moatagainst: BrandShield, BrandVerity, Red PointsBrand Protectoragainst: Red Points, ZeroFoxagainst: Appdetex, FarNorthReview, Incopro, Red Points, Trademark Engine
Four alternatives
BrandMentions, BrandShield, Netcraft, Red PointsThree alternatives
BrandShield, MarqVision, Red PointsTwo alternatives
BrandShield, MarqVisionTwo alternatives
Brand Protector, KleptofinderFour alternatives
BrandShield, Doppel, MarqVision, PodqiLlama 4 MaverickBrandShield, PriceSpider, Red Pointsno first choiceChangedPriceSpiderIP Moatno first choiceagainst: EBRAND
Five alternatives
Appdetex, BranditScan, IP Moat, MarqVision, Red PointsThree alternatives
Brand Protector, Bustem, IPzestQwen 3.7 FlashRed PointsRed PointsHeldagainst: BrandShieldIP MoatBrandShield, IP Moatno first choiceagainst: Corsearch, Fortress, Incopro, MarkMonitor
Five alternatives
Cloudflare Domain Registration, GoDaddy Domain Protection, Intelixence, Lumen, Namecheap Private ProxyOne alternative
IntelgenxFive alternatives
PriceSpider, Red Points, Rightlander, Scout CMS, bc.teamOne alternative
Red PointsKimi K2IP MoatBrand ProtectorChangedIP Moatagainst: MarqVisionBrand Protector, IP Moatagainst: BrandShield, MarqVision, Red PointsBolster, Red Pointsagainst: Bolster, FarNorthReview / GetDandy / ReviewVio, Red Points
Two alternatives
BrandShield, Red PointsThree alternatives
BrandShield, Knockoff, Red PointsThree alternatives
Bluepear, Brand Protector, Red PointsThree alternatives
Bluepear, Prisync, TracksuitOne alternative
Brand ProtectorGLM 4.7 FlashXIP Moat, Red PointsIP MoatChangedIP Moat, Red Pointsagainst: BrandShieldTramaTMno first choiceagainst: BrandMentions, Brandwatch, Corsearch, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Bolster AI, NetcraftFive alternatives
Alibaba Trade Assurance, Amazon Brand Registry, Corsearch, Google Alerts, TracerTwo alternatives
BrandMentions, MentionlyticsFour alternatives
Google Alerts, IP Moat, IPzest, LegalZoom Trademark MonitoringMiniMax M2.5Red PointsIP Moat, Red PointsChangedIP Moatagainst: BrandShieldIP Moatno first choiceagainst: Corsearch, Protect My Trademark
Two alternatives
BrandShield, IP MoatTwo alternatives
Remove.tech, nebtyThree alternatives
BrandVerity, MarkMonitor, Red PointsThree alternatives
IPzest, PriceSpider, Red PointsGPT-6 LunaNotolensBrand ProtectorChangedMarqVision, Red PointsAmazon Brand Registryno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BrandfenceOne alternative
NetcraftThree alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch ZealThree alternatives
Brand Protector, Google Alerts, USPTOMuse Glimmer 30BBrandShield, IP Moatagainst: Red PointsBrandShield - SMB EditionChangedIP Moat, IPzestagainst: Appdetex, Red PointsIP Moatagainst: BrandShield, Red Points, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Bolsteragainst: BrandShield, CloudSEK, Corsearch, FarNorthReview / GetDandy, MarkMonitor, The Trademark Company, Trademark Clutch, Trademark Engine LLC, Vital Trademarks, ZeroFox
One alternative
Remove.techThree alternatives
Beady AI, MarqVision, Red PointsOne alternative
MarqVisionThree alternatives
IPzest, Trademark.io, TramaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:50 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 25 | 72 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:07 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:51 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 15 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:56 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:13 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 19 | 51 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 25 | 87 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 6 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 14 | 71 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:10 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:13 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 21 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:31 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Unresolved, counted raw
Alibaba Trade Assurance
Alibaba's IP platform
BrandShield - SMB Edition
Brandfence
C9Lab
CSC Domain Management
Cloudflare Domain Registration
Copyscape
FarNorthReview (GetDandy)
FarNorthReview / GetDandy
FarNorthReview / GetDandy / ReviewVio
Fortgale
Fortress
GoDaddy Domain Protection
Google Copyright & Trademark Removal Portals
Google Copyright / Trademark Removal Forms
Google IP/Counterfeit Removal Tool
GrowByData
Intelixence
Kleptofinder
LegalZoom Trademark Monitoring
Meta Commerce & IP Rights Manager
Namecheap / GoDaddy domain monitoring
Namecheap Private Proxy
Obscuryn / PhishFence
Protect My Trademark
Registrar Abuse Complaints (ICANN)
Rightlander
Shopify's IP tools
SnapDragon
Spikerz
The Trademark Company
TinEye
Tracksuit
Trademark Clutch
Trademark Engine
Trademark.com
Trademark.io
TramaTM
USPTO's TTAB
UpGuard
Vital Trademarks
eBay VeRO
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.