Index › GTM › Marketing › Brand protection › BrandShield vs MarqVision
Brand protection platforms · November 2026 Edition

BrandShield vs MarqVision

Five of fourteen models named BrandShield first on the direct prompt; zero named MarqVision. BrandShield was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and MarqVision by eleven and BrandShield carries 59 labels and MarqVision 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BrandShield

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

MarqVision

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share19%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5915A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BrandShield reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Red Points was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. IP Moat vs BrandShield · IP Moat vs MarqVision · BrandShield vs Red Points

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the brand protection platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BrandShieldFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMarqVision
Direct501 against BrandShield
Paraphrase40
Comparative11
Budget-constrained014 against BrandShield
Scale-constrained00
Negative107 against BrandShield
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, BrandShield and MarqVision were named in the same answer thirty-nine times, of the 157 answers naming BrandShield and the 50 naming MarqVision. In those answers MarqVision took the first choice five times and BrandShield three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BrandShield and MarqVision stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BrandShield MarqVision first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BrandShield on the left and MarqVision on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BrandShield and MarqVision stood in it.

BrandShield first, MarqVision not the choice

5 of 14 modelsMarqVision was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashBrandShield alternatives: Bolster, Corsearch, Red Points, ZeroFox
Llama 4 MaverickBrandShield alternatives: Bolster, Netcraft Domain Protection, ZeroFox Brand Protection
Kimi K2BrandShield, Red Points alternatives: Bolster AI, ZeroFox
GLM 4.7 FlashXBolster AI, BrandShield alternatives: ZeroFox
Muse Glimmer 30BBrandShield alternatives: Bolster AI, Red Points

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Bolster alternatives: MarqVision, Podqi, Red Points
GPT-5.4 miniRed Points alternatives: BrandShield, CTM360, Fortra Brand Protection
Perplexity SonarBolster alternatives: BrandShield, Corsearch, MarqVision, Red Points
Grok 4.20Red Points alternatives: Bolster AI, BrandShield, Cyble, MarqVision
Mistral SmallBolster AI alternatives: BrandShield, Cyble, Red Points, ZeroFox Brand Protection
DeepSeek V4 FlashBolster AI alternatives: BrandShield, Red Points
MiniMax M2.5Bolster AI alternatives: BrandShield

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashIP Moat, Red Points alternatives: Bolster
GPT-6 LunaBolster alternatives: Doppel, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BrandShield leads by eight points.
BrandShield9%#3 of 11
MarqVision2%#6 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BrandShield leads by seventeen points.
BrandShield19%#2 of 11
MarqVision2%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BrandShield leads by sixteen points.
BrandShield16%#2 of 10
MarqVision0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BrandShield

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“BrandShield is a brand protection platform that you should be cautious about or avoid” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“BrandShield - Trustpilot Rating: 1.7/5 ... "They disregard owners and harass registrars"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“BrandShield — Enterprise-focused, expensive, requires custom quotes” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Start with Red Points if you have marketplace/counterfeit concerns, or BrandShield if phishing and social impersonation are your primary threats.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Recognized as a leader on G2 and awarded for cybersecurity breakthroughs, with a focus on both automated and human-led enforcement.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best brand protection platform for a mid-market B2B company is BrandShield, according to icoda.io.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about MarqVision

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For an ecommerce brand with counterfeits, compare Red Points, Corsearch and MarqVision.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for E-Commerce & Counterfeit Goods: MarqVision or Red Points (Starter Tier)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Designed for mid-market buyers seeking more oversight than fully automated tools without enterprise-level pricing” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.