IP Moat vs MarqVision
One of fourteen models named IP Moat first on the direct prompt; zero named MarqVision. IP Moat was named by twelve of the fourteen models and MarqVision by eleven and IP Moat carries 14 labels and MarqVision 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the brand protection platforms page.
By framing
IP MoatFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMarqVision
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, IP Moat and MarqVision were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 50 answers naming IP Moat and the 50 naming MarqVision. In those answers MarqVision took the first choice zero times and IP Moat nine.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
IP Moat MarqVision first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, IP Moat on the left and MarqVision on the right.The direct prompt
IP Moat first, MarqVision not the choice
1 of 14 modelsMarqVision was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
IP Moat32%#1 of 11MarqVision2%#6 of 11IP Moat23%#1 of 11MarqVision2%#6 of 11IP Moat—not namedMarqVision0%#10 of 10What the models said about IP Moat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“IP Moat looks like the strongest value pick I found because its pricing starts at $105/month” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“IP Moat stands out as the best brand protection platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“IP Moat is the best overall choice because it is built specifically for SME e-commerce brands” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about MarqVision
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For an ecommerce brand with counterfeits, compare Red Points, Corsearch and MarqVision.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for E-Commerce & Counterfeit Goods: MarqVision or Red Points (Starter Tier)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Designed for mid-market buyers seeking more oversight than fully automated tools without enterprise-level pricing” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.