Brand protection platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “brand protection platform”, and as “tool to take down counterfeits and brand impersonation”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Red Points16BrandShield06Netcraft24others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Red Points held the lead, +2 points on 51%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
IP Moat32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (32%) replaces Red Points (37% then, 23% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketIP Moat23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (23%) replaces Red Points (40% then, 17% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Red Points53%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
IP Moat32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (32%) replaces Red Points (37% then, 23% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketIP Moat23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: IP Moat (23%) replaces Red Points (40% then, 17% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseRed Points53%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Red Points53%10%61endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.51% → 53%
Red Points53%10%61endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 51% → 53%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.51% → 53%02
BrandShield16%18%50accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 16%
BrandShield16%18%50accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 16%03
Netcraft6%0%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Netcraft6%0%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%04
ZeroFox6%10%42accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
ZeroFox6%10%42accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%05
Corsearch4%17%46accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 4%
Corsearch4%17%46accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 4%06
Bolster AI2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Bolster AI2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
MarkMonitor2%21%24accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
MarkMonitor2%21%24accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%08
Bolster2%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Bolster2%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09
Fortra Brand Protection2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Fortra Brand Protection2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
MarqVision0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MarqVision0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
IP Moat vs BolsterIP Moat vs MarqVisionIP Moat vs Fortra Brand ProtectionIP Moat vs CorsearchBrandShield vs Red PointsBrandShield vs Bolster AIBrandShield vs BolsterBrandShield vs MarqVisionBrandShield vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBrandShield vs CorsearchRed Points vs Bolster AIRed Points vs BolsterRed Points vs MarqVisionRed Points vs Fortra Brand ProtectionRed Points vs CorsearchBolster AI vs BolsterBolster AI vs MarqVisionBolster AI vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBolster AI vs CorsearchBolster vs MarqVisionBolster vs Fortra Brand ProtectionBolster vs CorsearchMarqVision vs Fortra Brand ProtectionMarqVision vs CorsearchFortra Brand Protection vs Corsearch
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Red Points53%
Red Points53%02BrandShield16%
BrandShield16%03Netcraft6%
Netcraft6%04ZeroFox6%
ZeroFox6%05Corsearch4%
Corsearch4%06Bolster AI2%
Bolster AI2%07MarkMonitor2%
MarkMonitor2%08Bolster2%
Bolster2%09Fortra Brand Protection2%
Fortra Brand Protection2%10MarqVision0%
MarqVision0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BrandShield18%
9 of 50 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“BrandShield has received consistent criticism regarding the quality of its AI and the responsiveness of its support team.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Corsearch17%
8 of 46 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if your brand operates in high-volume marketplaces or social ecosystems where precision matters.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Red Points10%
6 of 61 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Examples: Red Points, Trap. Why be cautious: While these tools have great UI/UX, enterprises often complain that the automated takedown workflows cannot handle the complexity” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
MarkMonitor21%
5 of 24 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“approach MarkMonitor and Corsearch with significant caution ... Why cautious/avoid: Frequently flagged as a "criticized challenger"” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 964 links across 214 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 23 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Red Points39 answers · 69 citations · 14 models
36 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Netcraft31 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BrandShield23 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Bolster18 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)16 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 12 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best brand protection platform”, “brand protection platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Points redpoints.com | 53% | 175 | 14,800 | 3,227 | 9,588 | 118 | 8 | |
| BrandShield brandshield.com | 16% | 151 | 720 | 48 | 1,117 | 24 | 1 | |
| Netcraft netcraft.com | 6% | 86 | 2,400 | 83 | 6,024 | 12 | 4 | |
| ZeroFox zerofox.com | 6% | 87 | 4,400 | 129 | 10,937 | $175 | 32 | 2 |
| Corsearch corsearch.com | 4% | 82 | 1,900 | 38 | 37,723 | 20 | ||
| Bolster bolster.ai Bolster AI 2%, Bolster 2% | 4% | 46 | 60,500 | 4,591 | 42,916 | 7 | ||
| MarkMonitor markmonitor.com | 2% | 39 | 2,400 | 65 | 2,830 | |||
| Fortra Brand Protection fortra.com | 2% | 27 | 30 | 0 | 125,581 | $34 | 60 | |
| Beady AI beady.ai | 2% | 2 | ||||||
| Group-IB's Digital Risk Protection | 2% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brandshield.com, expertinsights.com, g2.com, netcraft.com, redpoints.com, sourceforge.net). The first result for “best brand protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best brand protection platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to take down counterfeits and brand impersonation would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade brand protection platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best brand protection platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a brand protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which brand protection platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BrandShieldCorsearch, Red PointsChangedBrandShield, NetcraftRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, Corsearch, Red Points
Four alternatives
Corsearch, Fortra PhishLabs, Netcraft, Red PointsOne alternative
BrandShieldOne alternative
Red PointsTwo alternatives
BrandShield, CorsearchGPT-5.4 miniBrandShieldRed PointsChangedRed PointsRed Pointsno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bolster, Corsearch, Recorded Future Brand Intelligence, Red PointsTwo alternatives
Corsearch, MarkMonitorFour alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch, Netcraft, ZeroFoxOne alternative
NetcraftGemini 3.5 FlashZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldCorsearchRed Pointsno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Bolster, Corsearch, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft, Red PointsThree alternatives
Bolster AI, Corsearch, MarkMonitorFive alternatives
MarqVision, Netcraft, OpSec Security, Red Points, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Bolster AI, Corsearch, ZeroFoxPerplexity SonarZeroFoxBrandShieldChangedZeroFoxagainst: BrandVerityRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: Bolster, BrandVerity, CSC Digital Brand Services, MarqVision, Sentryc
Three alternatives
BrandShield, Netcraft, Red PointsFour alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxEight alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch, Fortra Brand Protection, MarkMonitor, MarqVision, Netcraft, PhishLabs, Red PointsThree alternatives
Bolster, Netcraft, ZeroFoxGrok 4.20Red Pointsagainst: MarkMonitorRed PointsHeldCorsearch, Red Pointsagainst: BrandVerityRed Pointsagainst: BrandShield, Corsearch, Cyble, MarqVision, OpSec SecurityBrandShieldagainst: Corsearch, MarkMonitor
Four alternatives
Bolster AI, BrandShield, Netcraft, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Authentix, BrandShield, CorsearchFour alternatives
BrandShield, MarkMonitor, Podqi, ZeroFoxOne alternative
ZeroFoxThree alternatives
MarkMonitor, Tracer, ZeroFoxMistral SmallBolster AI, NetcraftRed PointsChangedBolster AIRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, Corsearch, Red Points, ZeroFox
One alternative
ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, NetcraftSeven alternatives
BrandShield, Doppel, Fortra Brand Protection, MarkMonitor, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
BrandShield, NetcraftDeepSeek V4 FlashBrandShieldRed PointsChangedRed PointsRed Pointsagainst: ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Corsearch, MarkMonitor, Red Points, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Corsearch, Red PointsFour alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch, MarkMonitor, ZeroFoxSix alternatives
Appdetex, Bolster AI, BrandShield, Corsearch, MarkMonitor, ZeroFoxOne alternative
BrandShieldLlama 4 MaverickRed PointsBeady AI, BrandShield, Group-IB's Digital Risk ProtectionChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch, NetcraftQwen 3.7 FlashMarkMonitorCorsearchChangedZeroFoxRed Pointsagainst: BrandShield, Corsearchno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, MarkMonitor, Red Points, Trap
Four alternatives
Clearmetal, Enforica, Intelgenx, RedpointsTwo alternatives
Red Points, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
Bolster AI, BrandShield, Fortra Brand Protection, Red PointsOne alternative
BolsterKimi K2Red PointsRed PointsHeldRed PointsRed Pointsagainst: Bolster AI, BrandShield, Corsearchno first choiceagainst: Recorded Future, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch, MarkMonitorFive alternatives
Corsearch, Fortra Brand Protection, Mimecast, Proofpoint, ZeroFoxSix alternatives
Bolster AI, Cyberint, Doppel, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft, ZeroFoxGLM 4.7 FlashXRed PointsRed PointsHeldBolster AIRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: Bolster, BrandShield
Three alternatives
BrandShield, Corsearch, NetcraftThree alternatives
Authentix, BrandShield, Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionFive alternatives
Bitsight, BrandShield, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
BrandShield, CorsearchMiniMax M2.5Bolster, NetcraftBrandShieldChangedMarkMonitorRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, Red Points
Two alternatives
Red Points, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
Bolster AI, Corsearch, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxNine alternatives
BrandShield, CTM360, CloudSEK, Corsearch, Group-IB, Incopro, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
BrandVerity, CounterFindGPT-6 LunaNetcraftRed PointsChangedno first choiceKadanzaagainst: Frontifyno first choiceagainst: Adthena, BrandVerity
Four alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch, Red PointsTwo alternatives
Corsearch, NetcraftNine alternatives
Bolster AI, BrandShield, Corsearch — Zeal 2.0, Fortra Brand Protection, MarkMonitor, MarqVision, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxOne alternative
BrandkitMuse Glimmer 30BRed PointsBrandShield, Fortra Brand Protection, Red PointsChangedno first choiceRed Pointsno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, Clarivate, Corsearch, MarkMonitor, Red Points
Four alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch, MarkMonitorTwo alternatives
Netcraft, ZeroFoxSeven alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch, MarkMonitor, Netcraft, Red Points, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Brand Protector, BrandVerityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 17 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:54 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 19 | 70 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 14 | 117 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 25 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 19 | 57 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 82 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 13 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 23 | 134 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:13 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:56 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:17 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 22 | 150 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 1 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs/Lookout) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (formerly BrandProtect) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Unresolved, counted raw
Brand.ai
BrandProtect
Check Point Exposure Management
ClaimSpot
Clearmetal
Corsearch — Zeal 2.0
CounterFind
Enforica
Ennoventure
Flawtrack
Fortra PhishLabs
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Group-IB's Digital Risk Protection
Trap
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.