Brand protection platforms · RankedBrandShield
BrandShield is a brand protection and digital risk protection platform · brandshield.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
IP Moat is first at 32%.
IP Moat is first at 23%. 5 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Red Points is first at 53%.
Why models recommend it
“Start with Red Points if you have marketplace/counterfeit concerns, or BrandShield if phishing and social impersonation are your primary threats.”Kimi K2 · Direct question · first choice
“Recognized as a leader on G2 and awarded for cybersecurity breakthroughs, with a focus on both automated and human-led enforcement.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“The best brand protection platform for a mid-market B2B company is BrandShield, according to icoda.io.”Llama 4 Maverick · Direct question · first choice
“Reputable Alternatives to Consider... BrandShield – AI + human expertise model”Kimi K2 · Negative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“BrandShield is a brand protection platform that you should be cautious about or avoid”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“BrandShield - Trustpilot Rating: 1.7/5 ... "They disregard owners and harass registrars"”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“BrandShield — Enterprise-focused, expensive, requires custom quotes”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Strongly avoid unless you've verified their processes thoroughly.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as BrandShield, over the 157 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | 43 | Compare → | |
| 74 | 3 | View → | |
| 73 | 4 | View → | |
| 66 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 37 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 26 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 2 | View → | |
| 27 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 1 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of BrandShield →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on BrandShield's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- IT Security Teams
- Price stated
- exclusive pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free demo
- Customers named
- La Vie en Rose, Bang & Olufsen, Ferrara, Playtika, Liontrust
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 151 of the 157 answers that named BrandShield and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
472 of the 531 domain citations in answers naming BrandShield came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 343 | 18 | 2026-09-29 | Mobile apps, Ecommerce | |
| News or press | 99 | 2 | 2026-09-30 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 5 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 11 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 3 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 5 | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-30Cybersecuritydive ai scams news or press
- 2026-09-29Gaming scams blog
- 2026-09-23Brand phishing blog
- 2026-09-17Elevate your brand protection strategy in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-15Ai scams consumer fraud report report or ebook
- 2026-09-10Executive impersonation blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page brandshield.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.