Brand protection platforms · RankedNetcraft
Netcraft is a cybercrime detection, disruption, and takedown platform built for brand protection · netcraft.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
IP Moat is first at 32%.
IP Moat is first at 23%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Red Points is first at 53%.
Why models recommend it
“Best for: Phishing attacks and rapid takedowns ... Industry-leading speed with a 33-minute median takedown time”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“Netcraft offers very fast takedowns (median ~33 minutes for some threats) and browser-level blocking”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · alternative
“If your primary threat is fake websites, lookalike domains, or phishing: Use Netcraft.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“More cyber-threat oriented, particularly phishing, fraud, malicious or lookalike domains”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Netcraft — Quote-based, modular pricing (likely expensive)”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“G2's listed cons mention interface complexity, expensive/confusing pricing, limited customization, poor reporting, and false positives”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
“Netcraft is generally oriented toward larger-scale deployments”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Excellent takedown speed, but more enterprise-focused”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Netcraft, over the 86 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79 | 21 | View → | |
| 73 | 13 | View → | |
| 53 | 3 | View → | |
| 37 | 1 | View → | |
| 27 | 2 | View → | |
| 25 | 2 | View → | |
| 21 | 2 | View → | |
| 21 | 1 | View → | |
| 17 | 7 | View → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Netcraft →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Netcraft's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- brand and digital risk leaders
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- AWS EMEA SARL (EU) Region
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 86 of the 86 answers that named Netcraft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
265 of the 312 domain citations in answers naming Netcraft came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 518 | 74 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 16 | 14 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 8 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs zerofox comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs doppel comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs fortra phishlabs comparison
- 2026-09-29Thanks webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Glossary glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Web server survey blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netcraft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.