Index › GTM › Marketing › Experimentation › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Experimentation and personalization for enterprise buyers

Asked as “website experimentation and personalization platform”, and as “A/B testing and personalization tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48Optimizely CMS12Adobe Target09GrowthBook31others

48% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 46% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Optimizely CMS held the lead, +2 points on 46%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Optimizely CMS48%20%71endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 46% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.46% → 48%
02Adobe Target12%22%64accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 16% → 12%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 12%
03Kameleoon9%0%29accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 3% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 9%
04GrowthBook9%7%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 9%
05Statsig3%0%25accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 3%
06Convert Experiences3%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%
07VWO2%31%42criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Mutiny0%38%16criticized challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%
11AB Tasty0%31%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12Monetate0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Dynamic Yield0%14%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10LaunchDarkly0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Bloomreach0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Optimizely CMS48%
02Adobe Target12%
03Kameleoon9%
04GrowthBook9%
05Statsig3%
06Convert Experiences3%
07VWO2%
08Dynamic Yield0%
09Bloomreach0%
10LaunchDarkly0%
11AB Tasty0%
12Monetate0%
13Mutiny0%

What they warned about

Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Optimizely CMS
20%
14 of 71 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“When to avoid: If operating heavily in the EU/UK, handling PII at scale, or preferring self-hosted/open-source options for auditability.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Adobe Target
22%
14 of 64 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tied tightly to the Adobe Experience Cloud; without a deep commitment to that ecosystem, you'll hit a steep learning curve, heavy IT involvement, and opaque pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
VWO
31%
13 of 42 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid free tools like Google Optimize (discontinued) or basic ones like VWO/Convert—they won't scale reliably” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Mutiny
38%
6 of 16 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Discontinued its website personalization product in April 2026... making it unsuitable for enterprises seeking a dedicated personalization platform.” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 931 links across 264 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Convert26 answers · 39 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Optimizely26 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GrowthBook24 answers · 49 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Personyze24 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 40 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Croct17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Wingify16 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Webflow15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 15 citations · 5 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”, “website experimentation and personalization platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Optimizely optimizely.com
Optimizely CMS 48%, Optimizely Web Experimentation 7%
55%22960,50036,211200,757 company$21203
Adobe parent site
Adobe Target 12%
12%1261,220,000117,563
Kameleoon kameleoon.com9%71590328,6013
GrowthBook growthbook.io9%872,9001426,64626
Statsig statsig.com3%6712,100182353,837$1766
Convert Experiences convert.com3%79502220,8821
VWO vwo.com2%14722,20044925,874145
ABsmartly2%
Salesforce parent site
Salesforce Marketing Cloud 2%, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization 0%
2%317550,00060,632
Omniconvert omniconvert.com2%44

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.croct.com, guideflow.com, optimizely.com). The first result for “best website experimentation and personalization platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which A/B testing and personalization tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade experimentation and personalization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a website experimentation and personalization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which experimentation and personalization platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Optimizely CMS
Five alternativesDynamic Yield, Intellimize, Kameleoon, Personyze, Proof
against: Mutiny
Optimizely CMSHeld
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Mutiny, VWO
Optimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Convert Experiences, Omniconvert
One alternativeVWO
against: Optimizely CMS
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
GPT-5.4 miniAdobe Target
Three alternativesKameleoon, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Adobe TargetHeld
Two alternativesOptimizely CMS, VWO
Adobe Target
Two alternativesOptimizely CMS, Statsig
Optimizely CMS
One alternativeAB Tasty
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashKameleoon, Optimizely CMS
Four alternativesAbmatic AI, Adobe Target, Userled, VWO
Optimizely CMSChanged
Five alternativesAdobe Target, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Mutiny, Statsig
no first choice
Seven alternativesAdobe Target, Amplitude Experiment, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely CMS, Statsig
Statsig
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook, Kameleoon
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Convert Experiences, Crazy Egg, Flagsmith, Google Optimize, Instapage, Optimizely Web Experimentation, Unbounce, Unleash, VWO
Perplexity SonarOptimizely CMS
Two alternativesAdobe Target, Mutiny
against: 6sense, Demandbase
Optimizely CMSHeld
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Kameleoon
against: Mutiny
Optimizely CMS
Eight alternativesAdobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Insider, Kameleoon, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization, Statsig, VWO
VWO
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
against: Adobe Target
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS, Personizely, Personyze
Grok 4.20Optimizely CMS
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Amplitude Experiment, Kameleoon
against: Demandbase, Mutiny
Adobe TargetChanged
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Amplitude Experiment, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS
against: Convert Experiences, Google Optimize, VWO
Optimizely CMS
Six alternativesAdobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Monetate, Salesforce, Statsig
Optimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon
against: Google Optimize, GrowthBook, PostHog
Optimizely CMS
Five alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Statsig, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Google Optimize, Unbounce
against: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Mistral SmallOptimizely CMS
Four alternativesAdobe Target, Kameleoon, Personyze, VWO
Adobe Target, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely CMSChanged
Three alternativesMutiny, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization, VWO
Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Four alternativesBloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Insider, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Kameleoon
Two alternativesAdobe Experience Manager (AEM) with Target and Real-Time CDP, Optimizely CMS
against: AB Tasty, VWO
no first choiceagainst: Algonomy, Mutiny
DeepSeek V4 FlashOptimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, VWO
against: Mutiny
Optimizely CMSHeld
One alternativeAdobe Target
no first choice
Nine alternativesAdobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Eppo, GrowthBook, Insider, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization, Statsig
against: LaunchDarkly
Kameleoon
One alternativeGrowthBook
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Optimizely CMS
Five alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, Statsig, VWO
against: Acquia Personalization, Adobe Target, Episerver, Google Optimize, Optimizely Web Experimentation, Sitecore
Llama 4 MaverickOptimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, HubSpot Content Hub, SitecoreAI
Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing CloudChangedno first choiceOptimizely CMSOptimizely CMSagainst: HubSpot Content Hub, Mutiny, Personyze
Qwen 3.7 FlashOptimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Mutiny
Optimizely CMSHeld
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Hypertune
no first choice
Six alternativesAdobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Monetate, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Kameleoon
Two alternativesAdobe Target, Optimizely CMS
no first choiceagainst: Divi Builder, Dynamic Yield, Elementor, Flagship, Instapage, Leadpages, Optimizely CMS, Shoptimizer, TestFort, Unbounce
Kimi K2Optimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Mutiny, VWO Testing
Optimizely CMSHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Target, VWO
no first choice
Eight alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Nosto, Optimizely CMS, Statsig, VWO
against: Monetate
Kameleoon
One alternativeConvert Experiences
against: Optimizely CMS, VWO
GrowthBook, Statsig
Four alternativesAdobe Target, Amplitude Experiment, Optimizely CMS, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS
GLM 4.7 FlashXOptimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Target, Sitecore, VWO
Optimizely CMSHeld
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Convert Experiences
Optimizely CMS
Eight alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Eppo, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Monetate, Statsig
GrowthBook
Five alternativesAWS Personalize, Contentful, Convert Experiences, Optimizely CMS, VWO
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, HubSpot Content Hub, Insider, Monetate, Optimizely CMS, Personyze, VWO
MiniMax M2.5Optimizely CMS
Three alternativesABsmartly, Adobe Target, Mutiny
Adobe Target, Optimizely CMSChanged
One alternativeAB Tasty
Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS
Six alternativesEppo, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Monetate, Statsig, VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) - Now Wingify
GrowthBook
One alternativeStatsig
against: AB Tasty, Optimizely CMS, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO
GPT-6 LunaOptimizely Web Experimentation
Two alternativesAdobe Target, Kameleoon
against: AB Tasty, VWO
Optimizely Web ExperimentationHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Target, Statsig
no first choice
Nine alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization, Statsig, VWO
GrowthBookagainst: Optimizely CMS, VWOno first choice
Four alternativesAdobe Target, Optimizely CMS, Statsig, VWO
against: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Google Optimize, VWO
Muse Glimmer 30BOptimizely CMS, Optimizely Web Experimentation
Five alternatives6sense, Adobe Target, Demandbase, Dynamic Yield, now Mastercard, Mutiny
Adobe Target, Optimizely Web ExperimentationChanged
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Amplitude, Kameleoon, VWO Testing
Optimizely CMS
Seven alternativesAdobe Target, Bloomreach, Dynamic Yield, Insider, Monetate, Mutiny, Salesforce
Convert Experiences
Two alternativesCustomFit.ai, Varify.io
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO, Wingify
ABsmartly, GrowthBooknothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:12yes179 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:48yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:20yes725 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:21yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:42yes1010 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:39yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:47yes2327 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:26yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:49yes517 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:46yes1242 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:20yes2527 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:20yes545 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:07yes327 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:08yes1418 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:11yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:19yes66 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:08no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:28yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:08yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:25yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:12yes2239 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:04yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:53no032 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:43yes2024 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:16yes1318 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:53yes537 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:12yes310 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:00yes1421 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:17yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:54yes57 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:06yes922 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:51yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:48yes512 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:56yes528 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:58yes2555 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:18yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:18yes1041 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:14yes2058 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:27yes24224 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:37yes2563 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:22yes839 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:28yes2442 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:36yes199 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:53yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:19yes722 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:47yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:05yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:16yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:04yes2532 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:23yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:47yes2078 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:52yes2553 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:21yes2549 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:58yes961 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:47yes216 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:52yes1422 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:20yes2815 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:36no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:50no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:49yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:42yes1020 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:17no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:29yes2554 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:41yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:39yes529 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:26yes1487 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:09yes2280 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:24no019 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:06yes228 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:38yes1526 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:02yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:21yes58 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:28no022 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:21yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:25yes1918 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:06yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:25yes2336 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:52yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:50no036 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:22yes2535 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:30yes1583 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:21yes2587 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:35yes324 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:50yes2241 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia read as Acquia Personalization
Adobe read as Adobe Target
Convert read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com read as Convert Experiences
HubSpot read as HubSpot Content Hub
Optimizely Web read as Optimizely Web Experimentation
Salesforce Interaction Studio read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Salesforce Personalization read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Personalize
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) with Target and Real-Time CDP
Algolia Recommend
Divi Builder
Dynamic Yield, now Mastercard
Flagship
Hypertune (Formerly Split)
SAP
Salesforce
Shoptimizer
Symplify
Taplytics
TestFort
VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) - Now Wingify
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Event managementInfluencer →