Index › GTM › Marketing › Marketing resource mgt › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Marketing resource management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “marketing resource management platform”, and as “marketing planning, budgeting and calendar tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Uptempo 22%
29Aprimo22Uptempo14Marmind35others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−7Since October 2026: 36% → 29%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Aprimo held the lead, −7 points on 36%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Aprimo29%21%56accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 36% → 29%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.36% → 29%
02Uptempo22%6%31accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 22%
03Marmind14%17%24accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 4% → 14%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 14%
04Adobe Workfront12%28%43criticized challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 20% → 12%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 12%
05Wrike for Marketing6%20%44accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
06Opal6%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
07Screendragon4%21%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12monday.com Work Management0%52%27criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Asana0%41%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Smartsheet0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Bynder0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08IntelligenceBank0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
O06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Aprimo29%
02Uptempo22%
03Marmind14%
04Adobe Workfront12%
05Wrike for Marketing6%
06Opal6%
07Screendragon4%
08IntelligenceBank0%
09Bynder0%
10Smartsheet0%
11Asana0%
12monday.com Work Management0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Aprimo
21%
12 of 56 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Aprimo is specifically called out as best avoided without a dedicated internal IT/project management team due to scope creep / implementation failure risk” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
monday.com Work Management
52%
14 of 27 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid per-user models: Platforms like monday.com, Asana, or Smartsheet scale costs directly with users” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Adobe Workfront
28%
12 of 43 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“generic work-management platforms such as Adobe Workfront and monday.com Work Management are treated by the model consensus as criticized challengers” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Asana
41%
11 of 27 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid selecting a general project-management tool such as Asana, monday.com, or Wrike as the financial planning system” Perplexity Sonar, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1031 links across 265 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 34 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

46 answers · 76 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Software Advice27 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra22 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge20 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Teamwork.com19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Aprimo16 answers · 34 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Marmind16 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PeerSpot16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Uptempo15 answers · 31 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best marketing resource management platform”, “marketing resource management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Aprimo aprimo.com29%2322,400356,007241
Uptempo uptempo.io22%629,9002,8725,750
Marmind marmind.com14%469
Adobe parent site
Adobe Workfront 12%
12%891,220,000117,563
Wrike for Marketing wrike.com6%127200703,499$21,69150
Opal6%201,00049,751
Screendragon screendragon.com4%3739032,72239
Aprimo Plan & Spend2%
Paramark paramark.com2%12
Planable planable.io2%305,4005969,87925

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aprimo.com, g2.com, getapp.com, marmind.com). The first result for “best marketing resource management platform” is growthmethod.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best marketing resource management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which marketing planning, budgeting and calendar tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade marketing resource management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best marketing resource management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a marketing resource management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which marketing resource management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Opal
Five alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Aprimo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
UptempoChanged
Two alternativesOpal, Wrike for Marketing
Adobe Workfront
Four alternativesAprimo, Bynder, Kantata, Uptempo
Uptempo
Two alternativesAprimo, Screendragon
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Wrike for Marketing, inMotionNow
GPT-5.4 miniAprimo
Four alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Asana, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
UptempoChanged
Six alternativesAnaplan, Asana, OneStream, Planful for Marketing, Smartsheet, Wrike for Marketing
Aprimo
Three alternativesAdobe Workfront, Bynder, Oracle Siebel MRM
Adobe Workfront
One alternativeAprimo
no first choiceagainst: Aprimo, Marmind, Screendragon
Gemini 3.5 FlashAdobe Workfront
Three alternativesAprimo, Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Uptempo
UptempoChanged
Four alternativesAdobe Workfront, Anaplan for Marketing, Asana, Wrike for Marketing
Adobe Workfront
Four alternativesAprimo, Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Uptempo, Wrike for Marketing
Aprimo
Three alternativesAdobe Workfront, Smartsheet, Uptempo
no first choiceagainst: Asana, ClickUp, Notion, Trello, monday.com Work Management
Perplexity SonarAprimo
Two alternativesMarmind, Wrike for Marketing
UptempoChanged
One alternativeAprimo
against: Asana, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
Aprimo
Eight alternativesAdobe Workfront, Allocadia, Brandfolder, Bynder, Kantata, Opal, Optimizely CMS, Wrike for Marketing
Planable
One alternativeAprimo
against: Adobe Workfront, Kantata, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Airtable, Aprimo, Asana, Brandworkz, Bynder, Lytho, Notion, Scoro, Welcome, Workamajig, Wrike for Marketing, inMotionNow, monday.com Work Management
Grok 4.20Aprimo, Marmind
Five alternativesAdobe Workfront, IntelligenceBank, Uptempo, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
MarmindChanged
Three alternativesAnnum, Planful for Marketing, Uptempo
against: Asana, ClickUp, monday.com Work Management
Aprimo
Four alternativesAdobe Workfront, Kantata, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
against: Asana, Smartsheet
Aprimo
Two alternativesMarmind, Screendragon
against: Adobe Workfront, Asana, Smartsheet, Workfront, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
Uptempo
Five alternativesFrontify, IntelligenceBank, Marmind, Screendragon, Workamajig
against: Asana, Smartsheet, Trello, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
against: Aprimo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Marketing, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Unica
Mistral SmallAprimo, Opal
Three alternativesIntelligenceBank, Marmind, SAS Customer Intelligence 360
UptempoChanged
Three alternativesAsana, Smartsheet, monday.com AI Work Platform
Aprimo
Seven alternativesBrandMaker, HCL Unica Plan, Opal, SAP Marketing Cloud, SAS Customer Intelligence 360, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com AI Work Platform
Screendragonagainst: Asana, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Managementno first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Image Relay, Infor, Kantata, MediaValet, Planview, Screendragon, Uptempo, Widen
DeepSeek V4 FlashAprimo
Four alternativesAdobe Workfront, Atlassian, Opal, Uptempo
UptempoChanged
One alternativeAprimo
against: Adobe Workfront
Aprimo
Four alternativesAdobe Workfront, Bynder, Marmind, Wrike for Marketing
Wrike for Marketingagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Infor, ScreendragonAdobe Workfront
Three alternativesAprimo, Bynder, Wrike for Marketing
against: Asana, monday.com Work Management
nothing named
Llama 4 MaverickMarmindno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashAdobe Workfront, Aprimo
One alternativeWrike for Marketing
against: monday.com Work Management
Wrike for MarketingChanged
One alternativeSmartsheet
against: Asana, CoSchedule Marketing Suite, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce
Aprimo
Seven alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Allocadia, BrandMaker, Censhare, Screendragon, Wedia, Workfront
Adobe Workfront, Wrike for Marketingagainst: Aprimono first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Asana, Scoro, Trello, monday.com Work Management
Kimi K2Aprimo, Uptempo
One alternativeAdobe Workfront
UptempoChanged
Three alternativesAdobe Workfront, Aprimo, Wrike for Marketing
Aprimo
Six alternativesAdobe Workfront, Brandfolder, Bynder, IntelligenceBank, Marmind, Uptempo
Aprimo
Two alternativesBynder, Uptempo
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo
GLM 4.7 FlashXAprimo
Three alternativesBrandfolder, SAP Marketing Cloud, Workfront
MarmindChanged
Three alternativesAprimo, Opal, Uptempo
Aprimo
Two alternativesBrandfolder, monday.com Work Management
Screendragon
Four alternativesHubSpot Marketing, Productive, Resource Guru, Wrike for Marketing
against: Kantata, Marmind
no first choiceagainst: Marketing 360, Vya, Wild Apricot, monday.com Work Management
MiniMax M2.5Aprimo, Opal
Two alternativesAdobe Workfront, Wrike for Marketing
Marmind, UptempoChanged
Three alternativesAsana, Opal, monday.com AI Work Platform
Aprimo
Four alternativesPercolate, SAP Marketing Cloud, SAS Customer Intelligence 360, Uptempo
Marmind, Paramark
Two alternativesEtropo, Screendragon
Aprimo
Four alternativesAdobe Workfront, Bynder, Screendragon, Wrike for Marketing
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Bynder, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Infor Marketing Resource Management, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
GPT-6 LunaAdobe Workfront
Two alternativesAprimo, Uptempo
Aprimo Plan & SpendChanged
Two alternativesAdobe Workfront, Uptempo
no first choice
Eight alternativesAdobe Workfront, Ansira, Aprimo, IntelligenceBank, Marmind, Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Screendragon, Uptempo
SmartSuite
One alternativeAprimo
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Marmind, Uptempo
Muse Glimmer 30BAprimo
Seven alternativesAcquia DAM Widen, Adobe Workfront, Brandfolder, Bynder, Marmind, Smartsheet, Wrike for Marketing
AprimoHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Workfront, Uptempo
Adobe Workfront, Wrike for Marketing
Seven alternativesAprimo, BrandMaker, Infor, IntelligenceBank, Kantata, Marmind, SAP Marketing Cloud
Marmindagainst: Adobe Workfront, Allocadia, Aprimono first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, Lytho, Marmind, Wrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:45yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:10yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:03yes722 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:13yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:24yes1516 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:59yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:10yes2525 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:43yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:55yes1058 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:31yes2441 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:38yes15112 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:47yes522 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:40yes214 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:33yes1220 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:55yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:24yes46 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:43yes421 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:07yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:44yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:28yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:37yes2335 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:50yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:18yes551 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:28yes2533 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:37yes2334 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:15yes2048 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:34yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:11yes2328 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:30yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:22yes59 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:30yes1523 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:52yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:17yes1418 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:14yes1010 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:34yes2543 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:35yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:48yes924 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:35yes2445 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:42yes2551 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:50yes1034 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:28yes930 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:23yes1526 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:53yes199 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:10yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:29yes1126 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:27yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:15yes1011 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:36yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:10yes2421 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:16yes54 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:18yes1055 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:23yes2429 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:06yes23153 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:01yes1353 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:42yes313 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:29yes2225 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:32yes1913 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:10no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:36no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:16yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:33yes1519 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:44no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:21yes2549 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:22yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:35no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:19yes1359 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:45yes2449 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:36yes2043 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:42yes528 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:14yes1426 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:11yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:05yes25 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:05yes1226 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:38yes106 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:39yes1513 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:44yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:39yes2417 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:58yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:40yes2037 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:44yes1952 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:46yes23115 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:26yes2265 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:30yes421 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:21yes2326 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CoSchedule read as CoSchedule Marketing Suite
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Monday.com read as monday.com Work Management
Planful read as Planful for Marketing
Wrike read as Wrike for Marketing
monday read as monday.com Work Management
monday.com read as monday.com Work Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Acquia DAM Widen
Anaplan for Marketing
Aprimo Plan & Spend
Atlassian
Atlassian (Jira Work Management)
Atlassian (Jira)
BrandQ
Bynder MRM
CAKA
HCL Unica Plan
IBM Planning Analytics
Lytho Suite
MRMcentral
Media Desk
NetResults
OneStream
Optimism / The Ansira Platform
Oracle Marketing
Oracle Siebel MRM
Papirfly
Salesforce
Serchen
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Marketing automationMobile apps →