The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
monday.com Work Management is first at 39%.
monday.com Work Management is first at 19%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Aprimo is first at 29%.
“1. Adobe Workfront Best for: Enterprise marketing teams needing comprehensive work management”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“This is the "gold standard" for MRM... this is the most granular tool available.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Adobe Workfront and Aprimo are the most enterprise MRM-like”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose Aprimo or Adobe Workfront.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“several marketing resource management platforms that should be avoided or approached with caution... Adobe Workfront”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Criticized for expensive vendor lock-in, opaque pricing, and complexity. Best avoided”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as Aprimo or Adobe Workfront”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Dedicated enterprise Marketing Resource Management (MRM) platforms (like Adobe Workfront, Aprimo, or SAS) typically cost between $20,000 and $100,000+ per year.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Workfront, over the 96 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 17 | View → | |
| 56 | 5 | View → | |
| 46 | 7 | View → | |
| 42 | 2 | View → | |
| 34 | 5 | View → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 6 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Adobe Workfront →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Adobe Workfront's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 89 of the 96 answers that named Adobe Workfront and are not a share of its labels.
237 of the 257 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Workfront came from a third party's page. Twenty were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |