Index › GTM › Marketing › DAM · November 2026 Edition

Digital asset management

Asked as “digital asset management system”, and as “DAM platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Filecamp 17%
40Canto17Filecamp15Bynder29others

40% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−5Since October 2026: 45% → 40%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Canto held the lead, −5 points on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Canto40%6%52endorsed leader▼−5Since October 2026: 45% → 40%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 40%
02Filecamp17%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 17% → 17%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 17%
03Bynder15%20%56accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%
04Brandfolder6%8%39accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
05Pics.io6%5%20accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
06Air4%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07ResourceSpace2%10%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Google Drive Lab in the set0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%42%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Acquia DAM0%24%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Aprimo0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09MediaValet0%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Cloudinary0%0%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Drive is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Canto40%
02Filecamp17%
03Bynder15%
04Brandfolder6%
05Pics.io6%
06Air4%
07ResourceSpace2%
08Cloudinary0%
09MediaValet0%
10Acquia DAM0%
11Aprimo0%
12Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%
13Google Drive0%

What they warned about

Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Adobe Experience Manager Assets
42%
15 of 36 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“The product is extremely expensive yet lacks in many areas compared to its competitors. AEM Assets carries a huge administrative burden, is extremely clunky, not user friendly” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Bynder
20%
11 of 56 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Enterprise tools to avoid on a budget: Adobe Experience Manager, Bynder, Brandfolder, or MediaValet” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Dropbox
67%
6 of 9 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid overkill (pure enterprise tools like OpenText) or overly simple ones (basic file-sharing like Dropbox)” Grok 4.20, scale prompt
Acquia DAM
24%
6 of 25 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid "heavy" enterprise platforms like Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) or Acquia DAM” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 844 links across 177 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Cloudinary43 answers · 75 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Capterra40 answers · 68 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Software Advice28 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Canto23 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 38 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Brandfolder19 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rework15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Orange Logic13 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital asset management system”, “digital asset management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Canto canto.com40%13822,20011,60981,78465
Filecamp filecamp.com17%83590011,25217
Bynder bynder.com15%1906,60013694,929625
Brandfolder brandfolder.com6%1114,4005950,1630
Pics.io pics.io6%41390784,4556
Air air.inc4%59201,0001,766,60627,643$1,2754
Dash dash.app2%41165,000126,1235,69444
ResourceSpace resourcespace.com2%21590510,42704
Klyck2%
apollon OMN apollon.de2%2

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cmswire.com, thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best digital asset management system” is thedigitalprojectmanager.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best digital asset management system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DAM platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top digital asset management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital asset management system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a digital asset management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital asset management systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Canto
Three alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
CantoHeld
Three alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, Pics.io
no first choiceNextcloud
Five alternativesCanto, Google Drive, OneDrive, Pimcore, ResourceSpace
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Canto Cumulus, Extensis Portfolio
GPT-5.4 miniCanto
Two alternativesAcquia DAM, Bynder
CantoHeld
Three alternativesAcquia DAM, Bynder, MediaValet
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo
Six alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, Frontify, MediaValet
Filecamp
One alternativePics.io
no first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Gemini 3.5 FlashCanto
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
CantoHeld
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets
no first choice
Seven alternativesAdobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, Orange Logic
Pics.io
Five alternativesAir, Filecamp, Playbook, ResourceSpace, Stockpress Essential
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Canto
Brandfolder
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, Bynder, Canto, MediaValet
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets
against: Asana, Box, Dropbox, Drupal, Google Drive, IBM, Jira, OpenText Media Management, Razuna, ResourceSpace, SharePoint, WordPress
Perplexity SonarCanto
Five alternativesBrandfolder, Cloudinary, Frontify, MediaValet, OpenAsset
against: Bynder
CantoHeld
Four alternatives4ALLPORTAL, Brandfolder, Bynder, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM
against: Acquia DAM, MediaValet, Pics.io
Bynder
Seven alternativesAdobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Canto, Cloudinary, Frontify, MediaValet, Orange Logic
Filecamp
Five alternativesBox, Brault, Cloudinary, Dash, OneDrive
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint
Grok 4.20Bynder
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo
BynderHeld
Five alternativesBrandfolder, Canto, Filecamp, MediaValet, Wedia
against: Acquia DAM, Aprimo
Bynder
Six alternativesAcquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, Wedia
against: Aprimo, Google Workspace, Microsoft OneDrive
Dash
Four alternativesCanto, Klyck, Pimcore, ResourceSpace
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
Bynder
Four alternativesBrandfolder, Canto, MediaValet, Wedia
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Monday.com, OpenText Media Management
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, Degoo, Iconik, Launchmetrics, Widen
Mistral SmallBynder, Pics.io
Two alternativesAir, Canto
apollon OMNChanged
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, MediaValet, Pics.io, Stockpress Essential
no first choiceZiflow
Three alternativesCloudinary, Dash, Filecamp
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashCanto
Five alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, Filecamp, MediaValet, pixx.io
CantoHeld
Three alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, Filecamp
against: Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Bynder
Seven alternativesAdobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, Filecamp, Pics.io
Filecamp
Three alternativesAir, Dash, Stockpress Essential
no first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, MediaValet, Orange Logic
Llama 4 MaverickPics.io
Two alternativesAir, Canto
CantoChangedno first choiceFilecamp
Three alternativesBrault, Cloudinary, Ziflow
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCanto
Three alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
CantoHeld
One alternativeMediaValet
against: Bynder
Bynder
Three alternativesAdobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Widen
Air
Three alternativesBrault, Filecamp, Klyck
against: Brandfolder, Bynder
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Workfrontagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive
Kimi K2Canto
Four alternativesAcquia DAM, Air, Brandfolder, MediaValet
Brandfolder, CantoChanged
Three alternativesBynder, Filecamp, Pics.io
no first choice
Seven alternativesAdobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, Dash
Air, Filecamp
Three alternativesCloudinary, Pics.io, Stockpress Essential
no first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Bynder, Canto, MediaValet
GLM 4.7 FlashXBynder
Seven alternativesAcquia DAM, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, MediaValet, Wedia
BynderHeld
Two alternativesCanto, Pimcore
no first choiceagainst: Google Workspace, Microsoft OneDriveFilecamp
Three alternativesCloudinary, Kontainer, Stockpress Essential
against: Bynder
no first choiceagainst: AtroDAM, Axis Store Data Manager, Daminion, Sales Layer
MiniMax M2.5Canto
Two alternativesBrandfolder, Bynder
BynderChanged
Three alternativesBrandfolder, Canto, Ci Media Cloud
no first choiceFilecamp, Klyck
One alternativeBynder
against: Dash
no first choiceagainst: Canto, Dropbox, Extensis Portfolio, Google Drive
GPT-6 LunaCanto
Two alternativesBrandfolder, Cloudinary
against: Bynder
CantoHeld
One alternativeBynder
no first choiceFilecamp
One alternativeResourceSpace
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, CONTENTdm
Muse Glimmer 30BBrandfolder
Two alternativesBynder, Canto
CantoChanged
Three alternativesAir, Bynder, Filecamp
no first choice
Eight alternativesAcquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Frontify, Widen
ResourceSpace
Seven alternativesAir, Brault, Dash, Filecamp, Klyck, Pics.io, Stockpress Essential
against: Ziflow
no first choiceagainst: Canto Cumulus, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint, WebDAM by Bynder
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:45yes179 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:08yes67 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:41yes1123 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:17yes105 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:16yes1012 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:40yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:37yes2032 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:54yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:19yes533 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:01yes1430 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:56yes821 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:18yes1462 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:45yes519 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:51yes1522 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:15yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:04yes54 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:26no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:49yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:30yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:03yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:52yes2525 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:37yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:19yes2022 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:42yes1018 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:44yes938 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:17yes551 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:29yes212 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:33yes1415 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:23yes169 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:18yes57 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:49yes619 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:15yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:45yes517 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:39yes108 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:45yes2533 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:31yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:47yes517 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:08yes1251 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:21yes2068 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:44yes1533 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:27yes828 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:35yes2135 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:52no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:58yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:15yes1119 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:08yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:44yes57 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:45yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:19yes2221 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:54yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:41yes529 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:26yes1431 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:18yes1831 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:07yes533 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:25yes211 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:45yes1521 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:57no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:48no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:11no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:16yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:30yes1015 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:42no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:15yes1836 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:54yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:16no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:46yes921 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:24yes1448 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:04yes1027 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:16yes416 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:37yes1526 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:28yes3613 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:24yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:22yes1322 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:07yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:36yes1415 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:25yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:51yes2431 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:28yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:44yes939 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:41yes2438 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:33yes2484 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:46no020 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:49yes317 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:41yes2525 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
OpenText read as OpenText Media Management
Plytix read as Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM
Unresolved, counted raw
Axis Store Data Manager
CONTENTdm
CoSchedule Asset Organizer
Flight by Canto
Frame.io
Keepeek
Omeka S
Phrasea
Pimcore DAM
Resource Space
Scaleflex
Sitecore Content Hub formerly Stylelabs
WebDAM by Bynder
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Creative automationDirect mail & gifting →