Index › GTM › Marketing › Direct mail · November 2026 Edition

Print

Asked as “direct mail automation platform”, and as “print and direct mail marketing tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · PostGrid Print & Mail 18%
40Postalytics18PostGrid Print & Mail12Click2Mail30others

40% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−4Since October 2026: 44% → 40%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Postalytics held the lead, −4 points on 44%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Postalytics40%5%57endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 44% → 40%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.44% → 40%
02PostGrid Print & Mail18%16%58accepted challenger▲+16Since October 2026: 2% → 18%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 18%
03Click2Mail12%23%26accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%
04Sendoso10%27%41criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 10%
05Lob6%14%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
06Reachdesk4%18%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07PFL2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Thanks.io2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Postal0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
09PostPilot0%0%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
10DirectMail.io0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Postalytics40%
02PostGrid Print & Mail18%
03Click2Mail12%
04Sendoso10%
05Lob6%
06Reachdesk4%
07PFL2%
08Thanks.io2%
09PostPilot0%
10DirectMail.io0%
11Postal0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
PostGrid Print & Mail
16%
9 of 58 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid or use with extreme caution: PostGrid (faulty tracking, poor support, low Trustpilot rating, high cost, slow delivery” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Sendoso
27%
11 of 41 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“High platform fees ($15K–$100K+ annually before any gift spend), locked annual contracts, and rising total costs.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Lob
14%
8 of 57 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Lob - is not recommended for teams that are not technical, need global reach, or are budget-sensitive.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Click2Mail
23%
6 of 26 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid: Click2Mail (Poor Trustpilot rating, inconsistent support, unclear delivery status).” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 878 links across 157 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Capterra41 answers · 80 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Software Advice34 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DirectMail.io31 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GetApp28 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lob23 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Postalytics22 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best direct mail automation platform”, “direct mail automation platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Postalytics postalytics.com40%1601,000390,338282
PostGrid postgrid.com
PostGrid Print & Mail 18%
18%1991,60011196,042$7651203
Click2Mail click2mail.com12%1061,9002425,581$416
Sendoso sendoso.com10%2858,10010813,840107
Lob lob.com6%30227,1006,31955,936109
Reachdesk reachdesk.com4%2232,400251,2909
PFL pfl.com2%9849,5003,4961,4488
Thanks.io thanks.io2%2032004300
PostcardMania postcardmania.com2%205,4005718,942$170120
PostKnock postknock.com2%3

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 13 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (directmail.io, g2.com, lob.com, postalytics.com). The first result for “best direct mail automation platform” is thecmo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best direct mail automation platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which print and direct mail marketing tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top direct mail automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best direct mail automation platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a direct mail automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which direct mail automation platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Postalytics
Three alternativesLob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail
no first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: TaradelPostalytics
Two alternativesClick2Mail, Postie
no first choiceagainst: ContactPigeon, PostGrid Print & Mail, PsPrint, ReachEngine, VistaPrint
GPT-5.4 miniSendoso
Three alternativesPFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
PostGrid Print & MailChanged
One alternativeSendoso
Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Two alternativesPostPilot, Postalytics
against: Click2Mail
Lob
Two alternativesIgnitePOST, PostGrid Print & Mail
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashSendoso
Three alternativesLob, Postal, Reachdesk
ReachdeskChanged
Four alternativesLob, PFL, Postalytics, Sendoso
Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Seven alternativesPebblePost, Poplar, PostPilot, Postalytics, Postie, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Thanks.io
Three alternativesPoplar, PostPilot, Postalytics
against: Postal, Sendoso
no first choice
Seven alternativesLob, Poplar, PostPilot, Postal, Reachdesk, Sendoso, Stannp
against: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, Postalytics, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Perplexity SonarPostalytics
Three alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
PostalyticsHeld
Four alternativesLob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Reachdesk
no first choice
Nine alternativesClick2Mail, DirectMail.io, Lob, PFL, Paper Run, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot, Postalytics, Sendoso
Click2Mail
Two alternativesPostalytics, Thanks.io
against: Lob
no first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, PostGrid Print & Mail, Purlem, Stadium
Grok 4.20PFL, Postalytics
Two alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail
against: Reachdesk, Sendoso
PostGrid Print & MailChanged
Five alternativesLob, Modern Postcard, Postalytics, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Postalytics
Five alternativesHandwrytten, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Click2Mail
Two alternativesPostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot
Postalytics
Five alternativesLob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Reachdesk, Sendoso
against: Click2Mail, Handwrite.io, Inkit, Sentt
Mistral SmallLob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Two alternativesPostalytics, Postie
Lob, PostGrid Print & MailHeld
Two alternativesDirectMail.io, Oppizi
no first choicePostGrid Print & Mail, Postalyticsno first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
DeepSeek V4 FlashPostalytics
Three alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
PostalyticsHeld
One alternativeLob
against: PFL, Sendoso
no first choicePostKnock
One alternativeClick2Mail
no first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, Stadium | Snackmagic | Swagmagic, Stamps.com
Llama 4 MaverickPostalyticsPostGrid Print & MailChanged
Two alternativesContactPigeon, PostPilot
no first choiceClick2Mail
Three alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
no first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Qwen 3.7 FlashPostGrid Print & Mail
Three alternativesLob, Postalytics, Sendoso
PostalyticsChanged
Three alternativesHandwrytten, Sendoso, Thanks.io
Lob
Five alternativesClick2Mail, Inkit, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot, Postalytics
PostcardMania
Four alternativesClickYes, Printfection, VistaPrint, Zapier
MacGillivray Freeman, Sendoso
Three alternativesLob, Mailbox, Snail Snail
against: Lob, Postalytics, Printful, Printify
Kimi K2Reachdesk
Three alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
against: Sendoso
PostalyticsChanged
Six alternativesLob, Modern Postcard, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostcardMania, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Lob, Postalytics
Four alternativesClick2Mail, Inkit, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Click2Mail
Two alternativesPostalytics, Thanks.io
no first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, Lemlist, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, Sendoso, Snackmagic, Stadium, Swagmagic
GLM 4.7 FlashXPostalytics
Three alternativesDirectMail.io, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
PostGrid Print & MailChanged
Two alternativesReachdesk, Sendoso
no first choiceClick2Mail, Postalytics
Three alternativesPostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot, Simply Noted
no first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, GrowMail, Lob, PCM Integrations, PFL Direct Mail Platform, PebblePost, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postie, Sendoso, Snackmagic, Stadium, Swagmagic
MiniMax M2.5Postalytics
Three alternativesLob, PFL, Sendoso
PostalyticsHeld
Three alternativesHandwrytten, Mailchimp, PostGrid Print & Mail
against: Reachdesk, Sendoso
PostGrid Print & Mail
Four alternativesClick2Mail, Lob, Postalytics, Sendoso
PostGrid Print & Mail
Three alternativesBrandWell, Click2Mail, Postalytics
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaPostalytics
Two alternativesLob, Sendoso
PostalyticsHeld
One alternativeLob
Postalytics
Six alternativesClick2Mail, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postie, Stannp, Thanks.io
Postalytics
Two alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail
no first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, Postalytics, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Muse Glimmer 30BPostalytics, Sendoso
Two alternativesLob, PostGrid Print & Mail
SendosoChanged
Two alternativesLob, Postalytics
Lob
Five alternativesContact Pigeon, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Thanks.io
Click2Mail
Four alternativesInkit, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Thanks.io
no first choiceagainst: Direct Mail for Mac – DirectMail2.0, PostGrid Print & Mail
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:11yes179 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:00yes48 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:42no014 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:22yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:12yes1316 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:38yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:26yes2126 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:53yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:13yes527 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:03yes2031 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:57yes2429 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:13yes1529 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:02yes215 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:37yes2335 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:28no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:08yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:05yes822 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:08yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:14yes57 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:28yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:54yes2224 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:42yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:05yes524 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:07yes2036 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:05yes2037 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:48yes922 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:42yes26 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:24yes2530 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:58yes1012 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:01yes511 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:16yes1020 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:37yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:40yes1014 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:17yes55 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:00yes2523 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:53yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:51yes532 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:49yes2554 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:30yes927 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:33yes2553 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:14yes720 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:21yes1324 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:25yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:02yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:41yes1728 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:58yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:28yes1915 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:53yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:34yes2322 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:44yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:34no034 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:53yes1523 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:59yes1925 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:04yes837 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:22yes39 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:04yes1114 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:45no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:04no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:39no021 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:32yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:58yes1516 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:45no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:42yes2335 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:06yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:17no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:09yes1522 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:34yes1524 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:20no074 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:45yes417 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:32yes1317 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:02yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:46yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:14yes920 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:50yes103 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:02yes1420 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:23yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:04yes2328 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:43yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:47no029 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:46yes2534 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:12yes24256 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:29no010 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:52yes422 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:01yes2324 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
PostGrid read as PostGrid Print & Mail
PostGrid Print Mail API read as PostGrid Print & Mail
Unresolved, counted raw
ClickYes
Direct Mail for Mac – DirectMail2.0
MacGillivray Freeman
Mailbox
Purlem
ReachEngine
Shutterfly
Snail Snail
Stadium | Snackmagic | Swagmagic
Stamps.com
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← PRProgrammatic →