Print · November 2026 Edition
Click2Mail vs Thanks.io
Zero of fourteen models named Click2Mail first on the direct prompt; zero named Thanks.io. Click2Mail was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Thanks.io by nine and Click2Mail carries 26 labels and Thanks.io 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
founded 2017. Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate23%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Click2Mail reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Postalytics was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Postalytics vs Click2Mail · Postalytics vs Thanks.io · PostGrid Print & Mail vs Click2Mail
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the print page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Click2MailFirst choices, of fourteen modelsThanks.io
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Click2Mail
Budget-constrained61
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Click2Mail
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Click2Mail and Thanks.io stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Click2Mail Thanks.io first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Click2Mail on the left and Thanks.io on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Click2Mail and Thanks.io stood in it.
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail
GPT-5.4 miniSendoso alternatives: PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
Gemini 3.5 FlashSendoso alternatives: Lob, Postal, Reachdesk
Perplexity SonarPostalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Grok 4.20PFL, Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Mistral SmallLob, PostGrid Print & Mail alternatives: Postalytics, Postie
DeepSeek V4 FlashPostalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Llama 4 MaverickPostalytics
Qwen 3.7 FlashPostGrid Print & Mail alternatives: Lob, Postalytics, Sendoso
Kimi K2Reachdesk alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
GLM 4.7 FlashXPostalytics alternatives: DirectMail.io, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
MiniMax M2.5Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PFL, Sendoso
GPT-6 LunaPostalytics alternatives: Lob, Sendoso
Muse Glimmer 30BPostalytics, Sendoso alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Click2Mail leads by eleven points.
Click2Mail11%#3 of 6Thanks.io0%#– of 6Mid-marketThe figures above
Click2Mail leads by ten points.
Click2Mail12%#3 of 11Thanks.io2%#8 of 11Enterprise
Thanks.io is not named for this buyer.
Click2Mail2%#8 of 10Thanks.io—not namedWhat the models said about Click2Mail
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid: Click2Mail (Poor Trustpilot rating, inconsistent support, unclear delivery status).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you need seamless CRM triggers or fast turnaround.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“makes this a platform to approach with significant caution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best direct mail automation platform for a company with a limited budget is Click2Mail, which is available at $0/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, Click2Mail stands out as the best direct mail automation platform.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, Click2Mail is the best default choice.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Thanks.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Thanks.io — *Best Overall for SMBs & B2B Lead Generation*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Serves API teams and DIY senders, and creates hyper-realistic handwriting indistinguishable from personal notes.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“More approachable for smaller, relationship-driven mail programs than a full performance-marketing stack.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Postalytics vs Click2MailPostalytics vs Thanks.ioPostGrid Print & Mail vs Click2MailPostGrid Print & Mail vs Thanks.ioClick2Mail vs SendosoClick2Mail vs LobClick2Mail vs ReachdeskClick2Mail vs PFLSendoso vs Thanks.ioLob vs Thanks.ioReachdesk vs Thanks.ioPFL vs Thanks.ioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full direct mail standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.