Index › GTM › Marketing › Website governance · November 2026 Edition

Website governance and accessibility

Asked as “website governance and accessibility platform”, and as “website accessibility and quality monitoring tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Silktide Governance 23%
27Siteimprove23Silktide Governance10Pope Tech40others

27% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Siteimprove held the lead, +2 points on 25%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Siteimprove27%21%57accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 27%
02Silktide Governance23%6%48accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 23% → 23%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 23%
03Pope Tech10%0%10accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 3% → 10%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 10%
04Acquia Web Governance6%4%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%
05Level Access Accessibility Platform4%0%30accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
06DubBot4%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07Equally.ai4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
08Deque axe Platform2%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
09AudioEye2%56%27criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
10UserWay2%54%37criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15accessiBe0%60%35criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
14EqualWeb0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Wave0%24%17accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
11Monsido0%8%12accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
12axe DevTools0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
S02
03
04
L05
06
E07
08
09
10
11
a12
13
E14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Siteimprove27%
02Silktide Governance23%
03Pope Tech10%
04Acquia Web Governance6%
05Level Access Accessibility Platform4%
06DubBot4%
07Equally.ai4%
08Deque axe Platform2%
09AudioEye2%
10UserWay2%
11Monsido0%
12axe DevTools0%
13Wave0%
14EqualWeb0%
15accessiBe0%

What they warned about

Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
accessiBe
60%
21 of 35 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“The FTC reached a million-dollar settlement with accessiBe in 2025, finding the company had misled businesses by marketing its widget as a guaranteed compliance solution” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
UserWay
54%
20 of 37 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Products like accessiBe, UserWay, and AudioEye have marketed these solutions as quick, affordable compliance options. However, they have significant problems” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
AudioEye
56%
15 of 27 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Products like accessiBe, UserWay, and AudioEye have marketed these solutions as quick, affordable compliance options. However, they have significant problems” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Siteimprove
21%
12 of 57 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like Siteimprove unless you have a budget exceeding \$20k-\$30k/year” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 987 links across 288 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

42 answers · 97 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Silktide39 answers · 51 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Acquia23 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Siteimprove17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow15 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GetApp14 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · RatedWithAI14 answers · 22 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website governance and accessibility platform”, “website governance and accessibility platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Siteimprove siteimprove.com27%1686,600122117,981504
Silktide Governance silktide.com23%1124,96103
Pope Tech pope.tech10%2248043,9431
RatedWithAI ratedwithai.com10%14
Acquia acquia.com
Acquia Web Governance 6%
6%773,60021672,942 company$2,943921
Level Access Accessibility Platform levelaccess.com4%9058,285$983105
DubBot dubbot.com4%3459036,98810
Equally.ai4%
Deque axe Monitor deque.com
Deque axe Platform 2%, Deque axe Monitor 0%
2%3229,31432
Accessibility Tracker2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (accessible.org, acquia.com, g2.com, silktide.com, siteimprove.com, w3.org). The first result for “best website governance and accessibility platform” is acquia.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website accessibility and quality monitoring tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top website governance and accessibility platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a website governance and accessibility platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which website governance and accessibility platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Silktide Governance
Four alternativesAudioEye, Siteimprove, SortSite, accessiBe
AudioEyeChanged
Three alternativesSilktide Governance, Siteimprove, UserWay
Siteimprove
Five alternativesDeque axe DevTools, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide Governance, SortSite
DubBot, Pope Tech
One alternativeaccessiBe
no first choiceagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
GPT-5.4 miniSiteimprove
Four alternativesAcquia Web Governance, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance
SiteimproveHeld
One alternativeDeque axe Monitor
Siteimprove
Five alternativesCrownpeak Digital Quality Management, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, UserWay, accessiBe
Silktide Governance, accessiBe accessWidgetagainst: Siteimproveno first choiceagainst: accessiBe
Gemini 3.5 FlashSilktide Governance
Four alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Deque axe Monitor, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform
against: Siteimprove
Silktide GovernanceHeld
Two alternativesAcquia Optimize, Pope Tech
against: Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Siteimprove
Six alternativesCrownpeak Digital Quality Management, Deque axe Platform, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, Stark
against: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
Pope Tech
Six alternativesDubBot, Pa11y, Screaming Frog SEO Spider, WAVE Browser Extension, Wave, axe DevTools
against: AudioEye, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Siteimprove
Five alternativesDubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide Governance, eSSENTIAL Accessibility
against: Adally, All in One Accessibility, Allyable, AudioEye, EqualWeb, ReciteMe, Skynet Technologies, UserWay, accessiBe
Perplexity SonarSilktide Governance
Two alternativesDubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform
against: Siteimprove
Silktide GovernanceHeld
Two alternativesSiteimprove, axe DevTools
against: Wave
Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
Five alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Deque axe Monitor, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Pope Tech, axe DevTools
against: AudioEye, EqualWeb, UserWay, Wave
Pope Tech
Two alternativesSilktide Governance, axe DevTools
against: Siteimprove
no first choiceagainst: AudioEye, EqualWeb, Squarespace, UserWay, Wix, accessiBe
Grok 4.20Siteimprove
Eight alternativesAcquia Web Governance, AudioEye, DubBot, Equally.ai, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide Governance, UserWay
SiteimproveHeld
Three alternativesDeque axe Monitor, Equally.ai, UserWay
Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
Three alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform
against: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
Equally.ai
Four alternativesAll in One Accessibility, Siteimprove, UserWay Accessibility Widget, accessiBe
against: Acquia, Adobe Experience Manager
Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
Five alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, Deque axe Platform, Evinced, TPGi
against: AudioEye, Wave, accessiBe, axe browser extension
against: AudioEye, EqualWeb, Helperbird, MaxAccess, UserWay, accessiBe
Mistral SmallSiteimprove
Two alternativesAcquia Web Governance, DubBot
no first choiceChangedSilktide Governance
Three alternativesMonsido, Siteimprove, UserWay
Recite Me, UserWay
Three alternativesAccessibly, DubBot, Silktide Governance
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashAcquia Web Governance, Siteimprove
One alternativeSilktide Governance
against: Crownpeak DQM
Silktide GovernanceChanged
Two alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Siteimprove
against: UserWay, accessiBe
Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
Three alternativesAcquia Optimize, AudioEye, Level Access Accessibility Platform
against: UserWay, accessiBe
Pope Tech
Four alternativesAllAccessible, Equally.ai, Wave, accessiBe
against: Deque axe Platform, Siteimprove
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, Siteimproveagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBeagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
Llama 4 MaverickAcquia Web Governance
Four alternativesMonsido, Pope Tech, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
no first choiceChangedno first choiceAccessibility Tracker
Two alternativesDubBot, Elfsight Accessibility Widget
against: Siteimprove
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashWordPress
Four alternativesDrupal, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Microsoft SharePoint Online, accessiBe
Equally.aiChanged
Two alternativesDeque axe Platform, Monsido
against: Siteimprove
Silktide Governance
Seven alternativesEqually.ai, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, PowerMapper, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
RatedWithAI
Two alternativesAccessibility Tracker, Pope Tech
against: UserWay
no first choiceagainst: Arqus, AudioEye, EqualWeb, Recite Me, UserWay, accessiBe
Kimi K2Siteimprove
Two alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Silktide Governance
SiteimproveHeld
Two alternativesSilktide Governance, accessiBe
Siteimprove
Eight alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Askem, AudioEye, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, UserWay, accessiBe
RatedWithAI
Four alternativesDubBot, Lighthouse, Wave, axe DevTools
against: Monsido, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
no first choiceagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
GLM 4.7 FlashXAcquia Web Governance
Four alternativesEqualWeb, Insytful, Silktide Governance, UserWay
against: Siteimprove
SiteimproveChanged
One alternativeAccessibility Tracker
Monsido / Acquia Web Governance, Siteimprove
Five alternativesAccessibility Insights, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, Wave
against: UserWay, accessiBe
RatedWithAI
Three alternativesAccessible Web RAMP, Skynet Technologies All in One Accessibility, UserWay
against: A11yWatch, Wave
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Silktide Governance
Four alternativesAccessiway, Acquia Web Governance, Level Access Accessibility Platform, UserWay
Silktide GovernanceHeld
One alternativeAudioEye
Siteimprove
Six alternativesAudioEye, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, OneTrust, PowerMapper, Silktide Governance
against: UserWay, accessiBe
RatedWithAI
Two alternativesAll in One Accessibility, Deque axe DevTools
no first choiceagainst: AudioEye, Squarespace, UserWay, Wix, accessiBe
GPT-6 LunaSilktide Governance
Two alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Siteimprove
DubBotChanged
One alternativeSilktide Governance
Siteimprove
Five alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Deque axe Platform, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance
Pope Tech
One alternativeDubBot
no first choiceagainst: accessiBe
Muse Glimmer 30BSiteimprove
Two alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Silktide Governance
SiteimproveHeld
Two alternativesDeque axe Monitor, Monsido
Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
Three alternativesAcquia Web Governance, Deque axe DevTools, Level Access Accessibility Platform
RatedWithAI
Four alternativesAll in One Accessibility, AllAccessible AI, Deque axe DevTools, Wave
against: Acquia Web Governance, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove
no first choiceagainst: AudioEye, EqualWeb, Framer, UserWay, Wix, accessiBe
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:04yes189 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:25yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:52yes1021 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:07yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:26yes1513 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:58yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:31yes2434 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:22yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:23no041 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:54yes923 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:55yes2470 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:00yes1541 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:19yes513 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:23yes2433 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:22yes189 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:19yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:40yes921 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:00yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:47yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:37no01 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:00yes2559 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:03yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:32yes940 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:50yes1946 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:40yes2467 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:40yes1528 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:52yes316 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:07yes1220 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:58yes1612 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:38yes510 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:23yes1222 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:01yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:12yes516 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:24yes107 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:18yes2548 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:30yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:15yes1031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:52yes2026 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:12yes2559 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:06yes1063 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:35yes828 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:41yes2438 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:24yes198 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:13yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:10yes1018 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:29yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:18yes1313 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:06yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:17yes2427 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:05yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:35yes1047 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:00yes2056 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:23yes2581 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:04yes527 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:54yes317 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:42yes2021 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:09yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:07yes78 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:05no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:14yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:25yes917 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:14no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:36yes2338 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:42yes95 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:27no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:30yes1327 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:06yes1544 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:43yes1046 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:54yes521 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:07yes1529 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:56yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:35yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:54yes1219 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:03yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:30yes1411 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:47yes87 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:30yes2444 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:51yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:46yes1036 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:00yes2424 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:41yes2432 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:38no024 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:46yes215 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:01yes1924 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia Web Governance formerly Monsido read as Acquia Web Governance
Acquia Web Governance, formerly Monsido read as Acquia Web Governance
Acquia/Monsido read as Acquia Web Governance
Crownpeak read as Crownpeak Digital Quality Management
Crownpeak (incorporating Monsido) read as Crownpeak Digital Quality Management
Deque read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (axe DevTools) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (axe) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe DevTools) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe Platform / WorldSpace) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe suite) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe) read as Deque axe Platform
Level Access read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Silktide read as Silktide Governance
Siteimprove.ai read as Siteimprove
Unresolved, counted raw
ARC Toolkit
Accessi.org
Accessible.org
Accessibly
Accessiway
Acquia
Adally
AllyProof
Arqus
Barrier Break
Cynthia Says
Dynomapper
Helperbird
IBM Equal Access
Jira Service Desk
MaxAccess
Microsoft SharePoint Online
ReciteMe
Skynet Technologies All in One Accessibility
WAVE Browser Extension
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
accessiBe accessWidget
axe browser extension
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← WebinarsAI SDR →