Website governance and accessibility for small business buyers
Asked as “website governance and accessibility platform”, and as “website accessibility and quality monitoring tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · UserWay 12%
19Silktide Governance12UserWay10RatedWithAI58others
19% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Silktide Governance (19%) replaces UserWay (19% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Silktide Governance leads at 19%, replacing UserWay, which led at 19% and stands at 12% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessSilktide Governance19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Silktide Governance (19%) replaces UserWay (19% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-market
Siteimprove27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSiteimprove57%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Siteimprove27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSiteimprove57%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Silktide Governance19%11%35accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 17% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 19%
02
UserWay12%37%43criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%
UserWay12%37%43criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%03Equally.ai8%0%21accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%
04
DubBot6%0%14accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 6%
DubBot6%0%14accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 6%05
accessiBe6%56%48criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
accessiBe6%56%48criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%06
Acquia Web Governance4%28%18criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
Acquia Web Governance4%28%18criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%07Siteimprove4%58%48criticized challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 15% → 4%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 4%
Siteimprove4%58%48criticized challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 15% → 4%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 4%08
Wave2%5%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Wave2%5%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Pope Tech2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Pope Tech2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%10
Monsido2%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Monsido2%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14EqualWeb0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15
AudioEye0%52%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
AudioEye0%52%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13All in One Accessibility0%10%10accepted challengernewNew since October 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
11axe DevTools0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Google Lighthouse Lab in the set0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Lighthouse is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Siteimprove vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformSiteimprove vs DubBotSiteimprove vs Equally.aiSiteimprove vs Deque axe PlatformSilktide Governance vs Pope TechSilktide Governance vs Acquia Web GovernanceSilktide Governance vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformSilktide Governance vs DubBotSilktide Governance vs Equally.aiSilktide Governance vs Deque axe PlatformPope Tech vs Acquia Web GovernancePope Tech vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformPope Tech vs DubBotPope Tech vs Equally.aiPope Tech vs Deque axe PlatformAcquia Web Governance vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformAcquia Web Governance vs DubBotAcquia Web Governance vs Equally.aiAcquia Web Governance vs Deque axe PlatformLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs DubBotLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs Equally.aiLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs Deque axe PlatformDubBot vs Equally.aiDubBot vs Deque axe PlatformEqually.ai vs Deque axe Platform
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
S01
02E03
04050607080910a11
G12
A13
E14
15Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Silktide Governance19%
02UserWay12%
UserWay12%03Equally.ai8%
04DubBot6%
DubBot6%05accessiBe6%
accessiBe6%06Acquia Web Governance4%
Acquia Web Governance4%07Siteimprove4%
Siteimprove4%08Wave2%
Wave2%09Pope Tech2%
Pope Tech2%10Monsido2%
Monsido2%11axe DevTools0%
12Google Lighthouse0%
13All in One Accessibility0%
14EqualWeb0%
15AudioEye0%
AudioEye0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
accessiBe56%
27 of 48 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 19 hard negative
“Be cautious with (or avoid) most website accessibility overlays/widgets... These tools (e.g., accessiBe, UserWay, EqualWeb, AudioEye, and similar plugins) claim to "automatically" fix WCAG/ADA compliance via JavaScript but often fail to deliver true accessibility.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Siteimprove58%
28 of 48 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“What to avoid for a small B2B business - Siteimprove: Excellent but priced for enterprises” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
UserWay37%
16 of 43 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“The single most important platform category to avoid are accessibility overlays — especially accessiBe ... but also UserWay, AudioEye, and similar tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
AudioEye52%
12 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“The single most important platform category to avoid are accessibility overlays ... but also UserWay, AudioEye, and similar tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 910 links across 267 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
48 answers · 123 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Software Advice35 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Silktide27 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GetApp22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge20 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RatedWithAI18 answers · 32 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · AudioEye13 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Siteimprove13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
7 answers · 5 models
7 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website governance and accessibility platform”, “website governance and accessibility platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silktide Governance silktide.com | 19% | 112 | 4,961 | 0 | 3 | |||
| UserWay userway.org | 12% | 102 | 2,400 | 72 | 42,885 | 36 | 9 | |
| RatedWithAI ratedwithai.com | 10% | 14 | ||||||
| Equally.ai | 8% | |||||||
| DubBot dubbot.com | 6% | 34 | 590 | 3 | 6,988 | 10 | ||
| accessiBe accessibe.com | 6% | 105 | 5,400 | 104 | 36,180 | 59 | ||
| Acquia acquia.com Acquia Web Governance 4% | 4% | 77 | 3,600 | 216 | 72,942 company | $2,943 | 92 | 1 |
| Siteimprove siteimprove.com | 4% | 168 | 6,600 | 122 | 117,981 | 50 | 4 | |
| Wave wave.video | 2% | 47 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 54,926 | 1 | ||
| Pope Tech pope.tech | 2% | 22 | 480 | 4 | 3,943 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, silktide.com, siteimprove.com, w3.org). The first result for “best website governance and accessibility platform” is acquia.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website accessibility and quality monitoring tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top website governance and accessibility platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a website governance and accessibility platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which website governance and accessibility platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SortSite, UserWayagainst: Level Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveLighthouse, WaveChangedSortSite, WebYes AccessibilityUserWayno first choiceagainst: accessiBe
Two alternatives
Monsido, Silktide GovernanceTwo alternatives
GTmetrix, axe DevToolsTwo alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Silktide GovernanceFour alternatives
Accessibility Insights, Elfsight Accessibility Widget, Equally.ai, WaveGPT-5.4 miniUserWayagainst: Level Access Accessibility PlatformUserWay Accessibility Monitor + VPAT/ACR supportChangedagainst: SiteimproveSilktide Governanceagainst: Siteimprove, accessiBeaccessiBeno first choiceagainst: accessiBe
One alternative
SiteimproveTwo alternatives
Pope Tech, accessiBeFour alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, Monsido, UserWayOne alternative
SiteimproveGemini 3.5 FlashSilktide Governanceagainst: Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBeSilktide GovernanceHeldagainst: EqualWeb, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBeDubBot, Silktide Governanceagainst: SiteimproveDubBotagainst: Silktide Governance, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBeSilktide Governanceagainst: AudioEye, Siteimprove, UserWay widget, accessiBeagainst: AudioEye, Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, EqualWeb, Monsido, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Four alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, Equalize Digital, Screaming FrogThree alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Pope Tech, axe DevToolsTwo alternatives
Monsido, Pope TechFive alternatives
Pa11y, Pope Tech, Screaming Frog SEO Spider, WAVE Evaluation Tool Extension, axe DevToolsThree alternatives
DubBot, Monsido, Pope TechPerplexity SonarAcquia Web Governanceagainst: Level Access Accessibility PlatformSiteimproveChangedPope Techagainst: SiteimproveDubBotagainst: Acquia Web Governance, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove, UserWayno first choiceagainst: Acquia Web Governance, EqualWeb, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Two alternatives
Silktide Governance, SortSiteThree alternatives
DubBot, Pope Tech, WaveFour alternatives
EqualWeb, Silktide Governance, SortSite, axe DevToolsTwo alternatives
All in One Accessibility, Equally.aiGrok 4.20Silktide Governanceagainst: AudioEye, accessiBeMonsidoChangedUserWay, accessiBeagainst: Acquia Web Governance, AudioEyeUserWay's Accessibility Widgetagainst: Evinced, Pope Tech, SiteimproveAcquia Web Governanceagainst: UserWay, Wave, accessiBe, axe DevToolsagainst: AudioEye, Birdeye, EqualWeb, ReviewTrackers, UserWay, Yext, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Equally.ai, Siteimprove, UserWayFour alternatives
EqualWeb, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBeTwo alternatives
Silktide Governance, SiteimproveThree alternatives
All in One Accessibility, DubBot, Equally.aiFour alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, Recite Me, Silktide Governance, SiteimproveMistral SmallEqually.ai, accessiBeaccessiBeChangedEqually.ai, Monsido, Silktide GovernanceRatedWithAIno first choiceagainst: Siteimprove, TitanFile, UserWay, accessiBe
Two alternatives
All in One Accessibility, UserWayOne alternative
RatedWithAITwo alternatives
Siteimprove, accessiBeTwo alternatives
All in One Accessibility, Equally.aiDeepSeek V4 FlashSilktide Governanceagainst: Acquia Web Governance, AudioEye, SiteimproveWebYes SuiteChangedagainst: Deque axe Monitor, Siteimprove, accessiBeSilktide Governanceagainst: SiteimproveAllAccessibleagainst: Monsido, Silktide Governance, SiteimproveSilktide Governanceagainst: All in One Accessibility, Monsido, Siteimprove, accessiBeagainst: AudioEye, EcomBack, Prime Access, Squarespace, UserWay, Weebly, Wix, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Monsido, UserWay, accessiBeOne alternative
Pope TechFour alternatives
AudioEye, Monsido, UserWay, accessiBeFive alternatives
Ahrefs, Equally.ai, Google Search Console, Screaming Frog, accessiBeTwo alternatives
Accessibility Cloud, AudioEyeLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceRatedWithAIno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
All in One Accessibility, Equally.ai, accessiBeQwen 3.7 FlashSiteimprove Quality ManagerSiteimprove AnalyticsChangedSiteimproveagainst: accessiBeEqually.aino first choiceagainst: AudioEye, accessiBe
Four alternatives
AudioEye, Deque axe Platform, UserWay, WebflowFour alternatives
Checkbot, Google Lighthouse, UptimeRobot, UserWayTwo alternatives
UserWay, ValidomeTwo alternatives
Recite Me, WaveKimi K2DubBot, SiteimproveSilktide GovernanceChangedagainst: accessiBeRatedWithAIagainst: UserWay, accessiBeRatedWithAIno first choiceagainst: Monsido/Acquia, Silktide Governance, Siteimprove, accessiBeagainst: Allyable, AudioEye, EqualWeb, OneTrust, UserWay, accessiBe
Four alternatives
Monsido, Silktide Governance, UserWay, accessiBeTwo alternatives
AudioEye, WaveFour alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Equally.ai, Silktide Governance, SiteimproveFive alternatives
Equally.ai, Google Search Console, Lighthouse, Wave, accessiBeThree alternatives
AudioEye, Deque axe Platform, SortSiteGLM 4.7 FlashXUserWayagainst: SiteimproveA11yWatchChangedEqualWeb, UserWayagainst: SiteimproveAccessBellagainst: accessiBeno first choiceagainst: Acquia Web Governance, Adobe Experience Manager, AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
One alternative
AudioEyeTwo alternatives
Askem, SiteimproveFour alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Monsido, Silktide Governance, accessiBeFive alternatives
GetWCAG, Silktide Accessibility Checker, UserWay, WCAGgo, WP AccessibilityMiniMax M2.5Equally.ai, UserWayUserWayChangedUserWayagainst: Monsido, SiteimproveRatedWithAIagainst: Siteimprove, UserWayno first choiceagainst: AudioEye, Squarespace, Wix, WordPress, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Monsido, Siteimprove, accessiBeOne alternative
AudioEyeThree alternatives
AudioEye, Silktide Governance, accessiBeThree alternatives
OST WCAG Accessibility Checker, Wave, axe DevToolsGPT-6 LunaSilktide GovernanceURLintChangedPope Techagainst: SiteimprovePope Techno first choiceagainst: UserWay, accessiBe
One alternative
DubBotOne alternative
Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, Silktide GovernanceOne alternative
Silktide GovernanceMuse Glimmer 30BSilktide Governanceagainst: Level Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveEqually.aiChangedAcquia Web Governance, Monsidoagainst: SiteimproveRatedWithAIagainst: Monsido, Siteimproveno first choiceagainst: AccessWay, AudioEye, EqualWeb, UserWay, accessiBe
Four alternatives
DubBot, Equally.ai, RatedWithAI, accessiBeThree alternatives
GTmetrix, Siteimprove, UserWay Accessibility WidgetFour alternatives
Equally.ai, RatedWithAI, UserWay, accessiBeTwo alternatives
AllAccessible AI, Silktide GovernanceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 21 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 25 | 70 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 25 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:22 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 24 | 165 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:04 | yes | 10 | 61 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:05 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 7 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 10 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:36 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:25 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:06 | no | 0 | 89 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:49 | yes | 3 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 22 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 24 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 25 | 127 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:12 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia Monsido read as Acquia Web Governance
Crownpeak read as Crownpeak Digital Quality Management
Deque Systems (axe-core) read as Deque axe Platform
Level Access read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Silktide read as Silktide Governance
Unresolved, counted raw
A11y
A11y Pulse
AccessWay
Alt Magic: AI Powered Alt Texts at Scale
BrowserStack Accessibility
Checkbot
EcomBack
EqualWeb Accessibility Checker
Equalize Digital (Accessibility Checker)
GetWCAG
IBM Equal Access Toolkit
Level Access: End-to-End Digital Accessibility
OST WCAG Accessibility Checker
Pingdom
Prime Access
Sematext
Silktide Accessibility Checker
Siteimprove Quality Manager
URLint
UptimeRobot
UserWay Accessibility Monitor + VPAT/ACR support
UserWay widget
UserWay's Accessibility Widget
Validome
WAVE Evaluation Tool Extension
WCAGgo
WebYes Suite
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.