Website governance and accessibility · RankedaccessiBe
accessiBe is a website accessibility product that combines AI automation with human expertise to help organizations make their sites accessible · accessibe.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Silktide Governance is first at 19%.
Siteimprove is first at 27%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Siteimprove is first at 57%.
Why models recommend it
“one of the most widely adopted AI-powered ADA compliance solutions, particularly among small to mid-sized businesses”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Automated daily scans/fixes, legal risk mitigation... popular but mixed feedback on over-reliance on AI”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Best for: organizations seeking an automation-first accessibility platform.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
“accessiBe is designed to help mid-market businesses meet ADA & WCAG compliance”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
“The FTC reached a million-dollar settlement with accessiBe in 2025, finding the company had misled businesses by marketing its widget as a guaranteed compliance solution”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
“the FTC approved a final order requiring accessiBe to pay $1 million for making deceptive claims that its AI-powered widget could make any website WCAG-compliant”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“AccessiBe (and its rebrands/variants): Most notorious due to aggressive marketing, the FTC action, and high lawsuit association.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“The FTC has taken action against accessiBe over claims that its AI tool could make any website WCAG-compliant”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as accessiBe, over the 110 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 3 | View → | |
| 80 | 28 | View → | |
| 58 | 27 | View → | |
| 57 | 1 | View → | |
| 40 | 8 | View → | |
| 34 | 4 | View → | |
| 25 | 3 | View → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → | |
| 24 | 1 | View → | |
| 22 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of accessiBe →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 105 of the 110 answers that named accessiBe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming accessiBe came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 352 | 10 | 2026-09-30 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 83 | 9 | 2026-09-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 35 | 9 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 11 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 13 | 10 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 10 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2019-09-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-30Before you file your aoda report what should you check blog
- 2026-09-28Ai automation vs human expertise in accessibility what your organization actually needs comparison
- 2026-09-20Nhs accessibility glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20Accessible user interface glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20European web accessibility directive glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20React js accessibility glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page accessibe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.