Website governance and accessibility for enterprise buyers
Asked as “website governance and accessibility platform”, and as “website accessibility and quality monitoring tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
57%
Clear leader
57Siteimprove17Level Access Accessibility Platform11Silktide Governance15others
57% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Siteimprove held the lead, −5 points on 62%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessSilktide Governance19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Silktide Governance (19%) replaces UserWay (19% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Siteimprove27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSiteimprove57%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Siteimprove27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSiteimprove57%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Siteimprove57%9%70endorsed leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.62% → 57%
Siteimprove57%9%70endorsed leader▼−5Since October 2026: 62% → 57%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.62% → 57%02Level Access Accessibility Platform17%3%61accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 15% → 17%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 17%
03Silktide Governance11%0%34accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%
04
Acquia Web Governance9%9%33accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
Acquia Web Governance9%9%33accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%05
AudioEye4%33%24criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
AudioEye4%33%24criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08EqualWeb0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10
UserWay0%71%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
UserWay0%71%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
accessiBe0%70%27criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
accessiBe0%70%27criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Monsido0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Monsido0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%06
Deque axe Platform0%4%24accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Deque axe Platform0%4%24accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Siteimprove vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformSiteimprove vs DubBotSiteimprove vs Equally.aiSiteimprove vs Deque axe PlatformSilktide Governance vs Pope TechSilktide Governance vs Acquia Web GovernanceSilktide Governance vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformSilktide Governance vs DubBotSilktide Governance vs Equally.aiSilktide Governance vs Deque axe PlatformPope Tech vs Acquia Web GovernancePope Tech vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformPope Tech vs DubBotPope Tech vs Equally.aiPope Tech vs Deque axe PlatformAcquia Web Governance vs Level Access Accessibility PlatformAcquia Web Governance vs DubBotAcquia Web Governance vs Equally.aiAcquia Web Governance vs Deque axe PlatformLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs DubBotLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs Equally.aiLevel Access Accessibility Platform vs Deque axe PlatformDubBot vs Equally.aiDubBot vs Deque axe PlatformEqually.ai vs Deque axe Platform
One product takes 57% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
UserWay71%
20 of 28 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Accessibility Overlays (e.g., accessiBe, UserWay, EqualWeb, User1st...) Large enterprises should strongly avoid or be extremely cautious” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
accessiBe70%
19 of 27 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“Accessibility Overlays and "Quick-Fix" Widgets (*Primary Avoidance*) ... JavaScript-based overlay widgets (e.g., accessiBe, UserWay widget-only mode, EqualWeb, AudioEye widget-only layers).” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
EqualWeb
90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“EqualWeb and other widget-centered solutions: ... widget-only fixes should not be treated as a substitute for repairing the product itself.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
AudioEye33%
8 of 24 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“overlay widgets (e.g., accessiBe, UserWay widget-only mode, EqualWeb, AudioEye widget-only layers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1025 links across 320 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
44 answers · 95 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Siteimprove36 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Level Access34 answers · 52 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Acquia23 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Silktide22 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · AudioEye18 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Accessibility Cloud17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · RatedWithAI13 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website governance and accessibility platform”, “website governance and accessibility platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siteimprove siteimprove.com | 57% | 168 | 6,600 | 122 | 117,981 | 50 | 4 | |
| Level Access Accessibility Platform levelaccess.com | 17% | 90 | 58,285 | $983 | 105 | |||
| Silktide Governance silktide.com | 11% | 112 | 4,961 | 0 | 3 | |||
| Acquia acquia.com Acquia Web Governance 9%, Acquia Optimize 0% | 9% | 77 | 3,600 | 216 | 72,942 company | $2,943 | 92 | 1 |
| AudioEye audioeye.com | 4% | 69 | 2,400 | 66 | 36,679 | $3,630 | 56 | |
| dotCMS dotcms.com | 2% | 16 | ||||||
| Deque axe Monitor deque.com Deque axe Platform 0%, Deque axe Monitor 0% | 0% | 32 | 29,314 | 32 | ||||
| Monsido monsido.com | 0% | 39 | 480 | 5 | 242 | |||
| Crownpeak DQM crownpeak.com Crownpeak Digital Quality Management 0%, Crownpeak DQM 0% | 0% | 14 | ||||||
| Accessibility Cloud accessibilitycloud.com | 0% | 8 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (accessible.org, acquia.com, barrierbreak.com, g2.com, silktide.com, siteimprove.com). The first result for “best website governance and accessibility platform” is acquia.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website accessibility and quality monitoring tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade website governance and accessibility platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website governance and accessibility platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a website governance and accessibility platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which website governance and accessibility platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SiteimproveSiteimproveHeldLevel Access Accessibility PlatformSiteimproveno first choiceagainst: DigitalA11Y, UserWay, Wave, accessiBe
Two alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceTwo alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, Silktide Governance, SiteimproveOne alternative
Level Access Accessibility PlatformGPT-5.4 miniLevel Access Accessibility PlatformLevel Access Accessibility PlatformHeldLevel Access Accessibility Platform, Siteimproveagainst: UserWayLevel Access Accessibility Platformno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, SiteimproveOne alternative
Deque axe PlatformTwo alternatives
AudioEye, accessiBeOne alternative
SiteimproveGemini 3.5 FlashSiteimproveagainst: EqualWeb, UserWay, accessiBeSiteimproveHeldSiteimproveSilktide Governanceno first choiceagainst: AudioEye, EqualWeb, UserWay, accessiBe, axe-core
Four alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceFour alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, SiteimprovePerplexity SonarSiteimproveSiteimproveHeldSiteimprovedotCMSno first choiceagainst: EqualWeb, Siteimprove, Squarespace, Wix, accessiBe
Four alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Deque axe Monitor, Level Access Accessibility Platform, MonsidoSeven alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, AudioEye, Deque axe DevTools, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Pope Tech, Silktide GovernanceOne alternative
SiteimproveGrok 4.20Silktide Governanceagainst: Acquia Web Governance, accessiBeSiteimproveChangedagainst: Wave, axe-coreSiteimproveagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBeSilktide Governance, Siteimproveagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBeAudioEye, Silktide Governance, Siteimproveagainst: UserWay, accessiBeagainst: EqualWeb, User1st, UserWay, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveFour alternatives
AudioEye, Deque axe Monitor, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Recite MeSix alternatives
ARC Platform, Acquia Web Governance, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide Governance, TPGiTwo alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Level Access Accessibility PlatformTwo alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, StarkMistral SmallAcquia Web Governance, SiteimproveLevel Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveChangedSilktide Governance, SiteimproveLevel Access Accessibility Platform, Siteimproveagainst: EqualWeb, Equally.aiSiteimproveagainst: Siteimprove, UserWay
One alternative
Silktide GovernanceTen alternatives
AudioEye, Botify, Conductor, Deque axe Platform, Evinced, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, UserWay, Wix, accessiBeFour alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager, Crownpeak DXM, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility PlatformDeepSeek V4 FlashSiteimproveSiteimproveHeldSilktide Governance, Siteimproveagainst: EqualWeb, UserWay, accessiBeLevel Access Accessibility Platformagainst: Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, StarkSiteimproveagainst: Acquia Web Governance, Adobe Experience Manager, EqualWeb, ObserVPoint / Proofpoint Digital Protection, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Acquia Optimize, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceTwo alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility PlatformFive alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, AudioEye, Crownpeak DQM, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility PlatformOne alternative
SiteimproveSix alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Crownpeak DQM, Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide GovernanceLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSiteimproveChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
A11yWatch, Axe Monitor, BrowserStack, Equally.aiQwen 3.7 FlashLevel Access Accessibility Platform, Siteimproveagainst: AudioEyeSiteimproveChangedSiteimproveagainst: UserWay, accessiBeSiteimproveno first choiceagainst: Documentum, SharePoint Classic, Shopify, Siteimprove Analytics, Squarespace, UserWay, Widen Collective, Wix, WordPress, accessiBe
One alternative
Acquia Web GovernanceTwo alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, QualiBoothTwo alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, ObservePointOne alternative
Deque axe PlatformKimi K2SiteimproveLevel Access Accessibility PlatformChangedSiteimproveagainst: UserWay, accessiBeAcquia Web Governanceagainst: AudioEye, Deque axe Platform, EqualWeb, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Siteimprove, axe DevToolsno first choiceagainst: AudioEye, BrowserStack, Monsido, Siteimprove, UserWay, accessiBe
Two alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility PlatformTwo alternatives
Deque axe Platform, SiteimproveTwo alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Level Access Accessibility PlatformThree alternatives
AllAccessible, Pritect, SevirantaGLM 4.7 FlashXSiteimproveagainst: UserWay, accessiBeSiteimproveHeldAdobe Experience Manager, Siteimproveagainst: UserWay, accessiBeSiteimproveno first choiceagainst: EqualWeb, Sienna / AccessWay, UserWay
Three alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Silktide GovernanceThree alternatives
Axe Monitor, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Recite MeFive alternatives
Accessibility Cloud, Acquia, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Sitecore, WebflowTwo alternatives
Accessibility Cloud, PluroMiniMax M2.5Silktide GovernanceSiteimproveChangedLevel Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveAcquia Web Governance, Siteimproveagainst: Level Access Accessibility PlatformAudioEyeagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Level Access Accessibility Platform, SiteimproveThree alternatives
Deque axe Platform, Level Access Accessibility Platform, Tenon.ioTwo alternatives
AudioEye, Deque axe PlatformTwo alternatives
Accessibility Cloud, PritectThree alternatives
Crownpeak Digital Quality Management, Siteimprove, WordPressGPT-6 LunaSiteimproveSiteimproveHeldAcquia Web Governance, Silktide Governance, SiteimproveAcquia Web GovernanceSilktide Governanceagainst: Acquia Web Governance, Siteimprove, accessiBe's accessWidget
Two alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Deque axe MonitorTwo alternatives
Deque axe Monitor, Silktide GovernanceFour alternatives
Crownpeak DQM, Deque axe Monitor, DubBot, Level Access Accessibility PlatformOne alternative
Pope TechThree alternatives
Acquia Optimize, Deque axe Monitor, SiteimproveMuse Glimmer 30BSiteimproveSiteimproveHeldSilktide Governance, SiteimproveAcquia Web GovernanceLevel Access Accessibility Platformagainst: AudioEye, UserWay, accessiBe
Three alternatives
Level Access Accessibility Platform, Monsido, Silktide GovernanceFour alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, Deque axe Monitor, Level Access Accessibility Platform, MonsidoSix alternatives
Acquia Web Governance, All in One Accessibility, Botify, Conductor, Equally.ai, MonsidoOne alternative
Silktide GovernanceTwo alternatives
Acquia / former Monsido, SiteimproveBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 8 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 13 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 24 | 135 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 24 | 275 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 19 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 25 | 251 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 25 | 93 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 21 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:42 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:55 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 7 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 25 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 25 | 96 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Crownpeak read as Crownpeak Digital Quality Management
Deque read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (Axe) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (axe Core/Platform) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (axe DevTools & axe Monitor) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque (axe Monitor) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (AXE) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe DevTools) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe Monitor / axe DevTools) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe Platform / axe Monitor / axe DevTools) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe Platform) read as Deque axe Platform
Deque Systems (axe platform / WorldSpace Comply) read as Deque axe Platform
Level Access read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Level Access (formerly Accessible360) read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Level Access (formerly AudioEye) read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Level Access (with UserWay) read as Level Access Accessibility Platform
Silktide read as Silktide Governance
Siteimprove.ai read as Siteimprove
Unresolved, counted raw
Accessible.org Platforms (Accessibility Tracker, AAArdvark)
Acquia
Acquia / former Monsido
Acquia Cloud
Adobe Experience Manager governance modules
Auditray
BarrierBreak / Deque
Brotherbird
Crownpeak DXM
DigitalA11Y
Documentum
EnableAll
Governikus
Level Impact
ObserVPoint / Proofpoint Digital Protection
Pluro
QualWeb
SharePoint Classic
Sienna / AccessWay
TestParty
TetraLogical
User1st
Vigiscape
accessiBe's accessWidget
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.