Convert Experiences vs AB Tasty
One of fourteen models named Convert Experiences first on the direct prompt; zero named AB Tasty. Convert Experiences was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and AB Tasty by thirteen and Convert Experiences carries 41 labels and AB Tasty 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Paris, France, founded 2009. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.
By framing
Convert ExperiencesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAB Tasty
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Convert Experiences and AB Tasty were named in the same answer forty times, of the 93 answers naming Convert Experiences and the 83 naming AB Tasty. In those answers AB Tasty took the first choice one time and Convert Experiences seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Convert Experiences AB Tasty first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Convert Experiences on the left and AB Tasty on the right.The direct prompt
Convert Experiences first, AB Tasty not the choice
1 of 14 modelsAB Tasty was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Convert Experiences10%#3 of 16AB Tasty0%#14 of 16Convert Experiences16%#2 of 14AB Tasty2%#7 of 14Convert Experiences3%#6 of 13AB Tasty0%#11 of 13What the models said about Convert Experiences
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“consider Convert or Evergage if you need more advanced capabilities, though these lean more toward the enterprise end of mid-market pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“transparent monthly plans from $299/mo billed annually ... That's plan-around pricing but not "limited budget" free.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Convert Experiences and VWO are the top recommendations due to their balance of features, ease of use, and integration capabilities.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For Full-Stack Experimentation (High Tech/Mid-Market): Convert Experiences or Kameleoon. Both are praised for ease of use” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Tight budget, marketer-led, low traffic, needs CRM bucketing: Convert Experiences or VWO Experience Optimization.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about AB Tasty
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid beginning with Optimizely, Adobe Target, Kameleoon, or AB Tasty” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“AB Tasty — solid but enterprise-focused and custom-priced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Complaints include dev dependency and EU GDPR exposure for real-time decisions. Be cautious for long-term commitments amid the rebrand.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with AB Tasty if personalization and ease of use are priorities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“start with Optimizely, VWO, or AB Tasty” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose it if personalization is the primary objective... generally positioned more toward enterprise and custom-quote engagements.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.