Brand Protector is a self-serve brand protection platform in the digital risk protection category · brandprotector.io ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
IP Moat is first at 32%.
IP Moat is first at 23%.
Red Points is first at 53%.
“Brand Protector ($199/month) if you need comprehensive marketplace coverage with unlimited takedowns”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“For a low-touch, self-service alternative, Brand Protector at $199 / month gives you domain recovery, SERM and social monitoring.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Other alternatives for SMB brands include Red Points, MarqVision, Corsearch, and Brand Protector.”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Brand Protector gives a fixed $199/mo all-in alternative”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as Brand Protector, over the 20 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 3 | View → | |
| 12 | 7 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 1 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Brand Protector and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-two of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Brand Protector came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |