Review and reputation management for small business buyers
Asked as “online review management platform”, and as “reputation management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
21%
Contested · Praising.ai 21%
21Birdeye21Praising.ai09REVIEWS.io49others
21% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Praising.ai (21%) replaces NiceJob (15% then, 7% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Praising.ai leads at 21%, replacing NiceJob, which led at 15% and stands at 7% now: 14 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Praising.ai21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Praising.ai (21%) replaces NiceJob (15% then, 7% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageMid-market
Birdeye19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye29%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Praising.ai21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Praising.ai (21%) replaces NiceJob (15% then, 7% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketBirdeye19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye29%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Praising.ai21%5%19accepted challenger▲+21Since October 2026: 0% → 21%, +21 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.0% → 21%
Praising.ai21%5%19accepted challenger▲+21Since October 2026: 0% → 21%, +21 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.0% → 21%02Birdeye21%44%63criticized challenger▲+16Since October 2026: 5% → 21%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.5% → 21%
Birdeye21%44%63criticized challenger▲+16Since October 2026: 5% → 21%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.5% → 21%03
REVIEWS.io9%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
REVIEWS.io9%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%04
NiceJob7%5%37accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 7%
NiceJob7%5%37accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 7%05
Brand245%0%11accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
Brand245%0%11accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%06
Trustpilot5%19%21accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
Trustpilot5%19%21accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%07
G2 Buyer Intent5%0%11accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
G2 Buyer Intent5%0%11accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%08
Google Business Profile Lab in the set4%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Google Business Profile Lab in the set4%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%09
BrightLocal2%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
BrightLocal2%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%10
GatherUp2%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
GatherUp2%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Reputation0%69%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Reputation0%69%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Yext0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Yext0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Podium0%43%42criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Podium0%43%42criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
ReviewTrackers0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ReviewTrackers0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Yotpo0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Yotpo0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Business Profile is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Birdeye vs REVIEWS.ioBirdeye vs ReputationBirdeye vs ReviewTrackersBirdeye vs BrightLocalReviewflowz vs Brand24Reviewflowz vs TrustpilotReviewflowz vs REVIEWS.ioReviewflowz vs ReputationReviewflowz vs ReviewTrackersReviewflowz vs BrightLocalBrand24 vs TrustpilotBrand24 vs REVIEWS.ioBrand24 vs ReputationBrand24 vs ReviewTrackersBrand24 vs BrightLocalTrustpilot vs REVIEWS.ioTrustpilot vs ReputationTrustpilot vs ReviewTrackersTrustpilot vs BrightLocalREVIEWS.io vs ReputationREVIEWS.io vs ReviewTrackersREVIEWS.io vs BrightLocalReputation vs ReviewTrackersReputation vs BrightLocalReviewTrackers vs BrightLocal
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Praising.ai21%
Praising.ai21%02Birdeye21%
Birdeye21%03REVIEWS.io9%
REVIEWS.io9%04NiceJob7%
NiceJob7%05Brand245%
Brand245%06Trustpilot5%
Trustpilot5%07G2 Buyer Intent5%
G2 Buyer Intent5%08Google Business Profile4%
Google Business Profile4%09BrightLocal2%
BrightLocal2%10GatherUp2%
GatherUp2%11ReviewTrackers0%
ReviewTrackers0%12Yotpo0%
Yotpo0%13Podium0%
Podium0%14Yext0%
Yext0%15Reputation0%
Reputation0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Birdeye44%
28 of 63 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Hidden pricing, onboarding fees ($500–$15,000), 90-day cancellation notice required, automatic 8% "Innovation Fee" at renewal, contracts auto-renew” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Podium43%
18 of 42 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid tools charging $300–$500/month per location (such as Podium or Birdeye), which are geared toward physical retail and local B2C.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
Reputation69%
11 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“certain early versions of ReviewTrackers, Reputation.com, and various "gate" apps have been cited as facilitating this” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Yext60%
6 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-focused tools like Yext or Chatmeter unless you have significant budget” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 810 links across 208 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice40 answers · 67 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Capterra35 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 59 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Praising.ai28 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Albato22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Crazy Egg17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Birdeye13 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Vendasta12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · LocalImpact10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 11 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best online review management platform”, “online review management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Praising.ai praising.ai | 21% | 25 | 10 | 0 | 237 | |||
| Birdeye birdeye.com | 21% | 355 | 22,200 | 380 | 6,787,611 | $1,735 | 110 | 2 |
| REVIEWS.io reviews.io | 9% | 36 | 590 | 124 | 508,649 | $2,602 | 0 | |
| Reviewflowz reviewflowz.com | 9% | 29 | 170 | 0 | 2,034 | $467 | 11 | |
| NiceJob nicejob.com | 7% | 59 | 1,600 | 18 | 15,328 | 1 | ||
| Brand24 brand24.com | 5% | 218 | 2,900 | 61 | 28,164 | 67 | ||
| Trustpilot trustpilot.com | 5% | 72 | 165,000 | 2,892 | 88,097,858 | 35 | ||
| G2 Buyer Intent g2.com | 5% | 147 | 90 | 1 | 2,221,182 | 109 | 9 | |
| Google parent site Google Business Profile 4% | 4% | 79 | 550,000 | 1,719 | ||||
| BrightLocal brightlocal.com | 2% | 202 | 9,900 | 103 | 36,255 | 55 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (birdeye.com). The first result for “best online review management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best online review management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which reputation management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top review and reputation management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best online review management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an online review management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which review and reputation management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ReviewflowzPraising.aiChangedNiceJob, ReviewGroweragainst: BirdeyeHiFiveStar, ReviewGrowerno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Yext
Four alternatives
Clutch, Famewall, G2 Buyer Intent, REVIEWS.ioThree alternatives
G2 Buyer Intent, Oktopost, ReputationOne alternative
BrightLocalSix alternatives
EmbedReviews, Grade.us, NiceJob, Reputigo, TrueReview, WomplyGPT-5.4 miniG2 Buyer IntentG2 Marketing SolutionsChangedNiceJobagainst: ReputationNiceJobagainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Birdeye, NiceJob, REVIEWS.io, ReputationStackerTwo alternatives
Birdeye, GatherUpSix alternatives
Birdeye, Feefo, Okendo, Podium, ReputationStacker, YotpoOne alternative
EmbedReviewsGemini 3.5 FlashReviewflowz, Senja.ioagainst: Birdeye, Podium, ReputationBirdeyeChangedNiceJobGatherUp, NiceJobagainst: Birdeye, Broadly, Podiumno first choiceagainst: Better Business Bureau, Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Yelp for Business, Yext
Three alternatives
GatherUp, ReviewTrackers, TrustpilotTwo alternatives
Brand24, DelightedFive alternatives
Birdeye, GatherUp, Grade.us, Podium, TrustpilotTwo alternatives
Reply Champion, TrustindexPerplexity SonarReviewflowzagainst: BirdeyeBrand24ChangedNiceJobTrueReviewno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, ConsumerAffairs, Reputation, Yext
Two alternatives
REVIEWS.io, TrueReviewOne alternative
BirdeyeFive alternatives
Birdeye, BrightLocal, Podium, ReviewTrackers, TrustpilotThree alternatives
GLocal, Google Business Profile, REVIEWS.ioGrok 4.20BirdeyeBirdeyeHeldBirdeye, NiceJobBirdeyeagainst: Podium, Sprout SocialBirdeyeagainst: Birdeye, Grade.us, NiceJob, Thryv
Three alternatives
Podium, REVIEWS.io, YotpoFour alternatives
Brand24, Emitrr, Podium, ReviewTrackersThree alternatives
Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackersSix alternatives
AppReviewBot, NiceJob, Okendo, REVIEWS.io, ReviewJet, ReviewflowzThree alternatives
Podium, Reputation, ThryvMistral SmallPraising.aiBirdeyeChangedBrand24against: TrustpilotPraising.ai, REVIEWS.iono first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium
Two alternatives
Birdeye, REVIEWS.ioTwo alternatives
Birdeye, PodiumOne alternative
NiceJobDeepSeek V4 FlashREVIEWS.ioBirdeyeChangedagainst: Podium, ReputationNiceJobagainst: Birdeye, Podium, TrustpilotPraising.aiagainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Praising.ai, Reputationagainst: Birdeye, Broadly, Reputation, Sitejabber, Yext
Five alternatives
Birdeye, BrightLocal, Podium, Score My Reviews, TrueReviewFour alternatives
Brand24, G2 Buyer Intent, ReviewTrackers, TrustpilotThree alternatives
BrightLocal, ReviewTrackers, YotpoTwo alternatives
NiceJob, REVIEWS.ioLlama 4 MaverickBirdeye, Praising.ai, ReviewflowzBirdeyeChangedno first choicePraising.aino first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Podium, Praising.ai, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCiTwo alternatives
NiceJob, REVIEWS.ioQwen 3.7 FlashPraising.ai, REVIEWS.ioagainst: BirdeyeBirdeye, TrustpilotChangedReviewTrackersagainst: TrustpilotPraising.aiBirdeyeagainst: Reputationagainst: Birdeye, Emitrr, GatherUp, NetReputation, Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, Yext
Two alternatives
Podium, ReviewflowzOne alternative
ReviewTrackersTwo alternatives
Birdeye, PodiumFour alternatives
GLocal, Google Business Profile, NiceJob, REVIEWS.ioThree alternatives
NiceJob, Podium, YotpoKimi K2Praising.ai, REVIEWS.ioagainst: Birdeye, Broadly, PodiumBrand24Changedagainst: Chatmeter, Yextno first choiceagainst: BirdeyeBrightLocal, NiceJobagainst: Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation
One alternative
NiceJobThree alternatives
Birdeye, NiceJob, ReviewGrowerSix alternatives
Brand24, Grade.us, NiceJob, Podium, ReviewTrackers, Weights & Biases WeaveTwo alternatives
AppReviewBot, Google Business ProfileGLM 4.7 FlashXReviewflowz, TrustpilotTrustpilotChangedBirdeyeGoogle Business Profile, Praising.aiagainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, GoSite, NiceJob, ReviewTrackers, Sitejabber
Three alternatives
Birdeye, Okendo, YotpoOne alternative
BirdeyeFive alternatives
Brand24, Hootsuite, Podium, Praising.ai, ReputationFour alternatives
BrightLocal, EmbedSocial, Okendo, ReplyOnTheFlyMiniMax M2.5Praising.aiBrand24ChangedBrightLocalagainst: Birdeye, Grade.usGoogle Business Profileagainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choiceagainst: 某国内的seo优化公司
One alternative
BirdeyeTwo alternatives
Birdeye, BroadlyFour alternatives
GatherUp, Podium, ReviewTrackers, SocialPilot ReviewsFour alternatives
AppReviewBot, BrightLocal, NiceJob, REVIEWS.ioGPT-6 LunaClutch, G2 Buyer Intentagainst: TrustpilotG2 Buyer IntentChangedNiceJobagainst: BirdeyeNiceJobno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, ReviewVio, Sitejabber
One alternative
GatherUpOne alternative
Grade.usFour alternatives
BrightLocal, GatherUp, Google Business Profile, PodiumOne alternative
Google Business ProfileMuse Glimmer 30BREVIEWS.ioBirdeyeChangedBrightLocal, NiceJobagainst: Birdeye, ReviewTrackersPraising.aiagainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choiceagainst: Angie's List, HomeAdvisor, Revleap, Yelp for Business
Three alternatives
Birdeye, NiceJob, PodiumTwo alternatives
Brand24, Praising.aiThree alternatives
LocalImpact, Podium, ReviewGrowerFive alternatives
Google Business Profile, LocalImpact, Reply Fast, ReviewGrower, ReviewRoketBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:56 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:05 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:37 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 25 | 129 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 6 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:04 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:43 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:31 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:54 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:18 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 14 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 20 | 77 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:18 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:44 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Thryv read as Thryv
Thryv (formerly Yodle) read as Thryv
Yelp read as Yelp for Business
Unresolved, counted raw
Angie's List
Avvo
BBB
ConsumerAffairs for Brands
Cusrev
GBP Audit Tool by Paige
GetSatisfaction
Google
Google Reviews
Healthgrades
HomeAdvisor
Reply Champion
ReplyOnTheFly
Revleap
Senja.io
Trustindex
某国内的seo优化公司
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.