Digital asset management for small business buyers
Asked as “digital asset management system”, and as “DAM platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27Canto27Filecamp16Air30others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Filecamp held the lead, −6 points on 33%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Filecamp27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Canto40%Contested▼−5Since October 2026: 45% → 40%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Bynder43%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 48% → 43%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Filecamp27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketCanto40%Contested▼−5Since October 2026: 45% → 40%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBynder43%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 48% → 43%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Filecamp27%0%50accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.33% → 27%
Filecamp27%0%50accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.33% → 27%02Canto27%17%60accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 27%
Canto27%17%60accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 27%03
Air16%8%39accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 6% → 16%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 16%
Air16%8%39accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 6% → 16%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 16%04
Dash5%0%31accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%
Dash5%0%31accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%05Bynder4%63%46criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Bynder4%63%46criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06
Pics.io2%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Pics.io2%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Cloudinary2%16%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Cloudinary2%16%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
MediaValet2%31%29criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
MediaValet2%31%29criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%10
ResourceSpace2%20%10accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
ResourceSpace2%20%10accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%82%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%82%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Aprimo0%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Aprimo0%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Brandfolder0%44%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Brandfolder0%44%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Dropbox0%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Dropbox0%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Google Drive Lab in the set0%44%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Google Drive Lab in the set0%44%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Drive is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Canto vs Pics.ioCanto vs AirCanto vs ResourceSpaceFilecamp vs BynderFilecamp vs BrandfolderFilecamp vs Pics.ioFilecamp vs AirFilecamp vs ResourceSpaceBynder vs BrandfolderBynder vs Pics.ioBynder vs AirBynder vs ResourceSpaceBrandfolder vs Pics.ioBrandfolder vs AirBrandfolder vs ResourceSpacePics.io vs AirPics.io vs ResourceSpaceAir vs ResourceSpace
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Filecamp27%
Filecamp27%02Canto27%
Canto27%03Air16%
Air16%04Dash5%
Dash5%05Bynder4%
Bynder4%06Pics.io2%
Pics.io2%07Cloudinary2%
Cloudinary2%08Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM2%
Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM2%09MediaValet2%
MediaValet2%10ResourceSpace2%
ResourceSpace2%11Dropbox0%
Dropbox0%12Google Drive0%
Google Drive0%13Brandfolder0%
Brandfolder0%14Aprimo0%
Aprimo0%15Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Adobe Experience Manager Assets82%
23 of 28 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Highly complex, requires specialized Adobe developers to customize and maintain, and costs easily run into tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Bynder63%
29 of 46 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Examples that consistently come up as too expensive / complex for small teams: Bynder – enterprise-focused DAM. Marketed to 50+ people” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Aprimo71%
10 of 14 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Enterprise DAMs to Avoid or Be Cautious About ... Aprimo - Why be cautious: Extremely expensive with complex pricing” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Brandfolder44%
12 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“built for multi-brand portfolios and growth stage teams. Pricing is quote-based... Small teams often pay for capabilities they will not use.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 819 links across 139 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
46 answers · 55 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Capterra39 answers · 68 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Software Advice37 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cloudinary35 answers · 67 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Filecamp32 answers · 54 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Dash25 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Brandfolder24 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier20 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Rework14 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Spotsaas14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Brault12 answers · 19 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 13 models
23 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital asset management system”, “digital asset management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filecamp filecamp.com | 27% | 83 | 590 | 0 | 11,252 | 17 | ||
| Canto canto.com Canto 27%, Image Relay 0% | 27% | 138 | 22,200 | 11,609 | 81,784 | 65 | ||
| Air air.inc Air 16%, Air.inc 0% | 16% | 59 | 201,000 | 1,766,606 | 27,643 | $1,275 | 4 | |
| Dash dash.app | 5% | 41 | 165,000 | 126,123 | 5,694 | 44 | ||
| Brault brault.app | 4% | 10 | ||||||
| Stockpress Essential stockpress.co | 4% | 20 | ||||||
| Bynder bynder.com | 4% | 190 | 6,600 | 136 | 94,929 | 62 | 5 | |
| Pics.io pics.io | 2% | 41 | 390 | 7 | 84,455 | 6 | ||
| Cloudinary cloudinary.com | 2% | 105 | 14,800 | 177 | 455,152 | 7 | ||
| Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM plytix.com | 2% | 12 | 6,008 | 13 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best digital asset management system” is thedigitalprojectmanager.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital asset management system for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DAM platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top digital asset management systems for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital asset management system for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a digital asset management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital asset management systems should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CantoCantoHeldCantoFilecampno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Drive
Two alternatives
Daminion, FilecampTwo alternatives
Daminion, FilecampFour alternatives
Air, Filecamp, Photoshelter, Pics.ioThree alternatives
Air, Canto, DaminionGPT-5.4 miniCantoCantoHeldAir, Filecampagainst: Adobe Bridge, Bynder, MediaValetAir, ImageKitno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, ImageKit, MediaValet, The Ansira Platform
Four alternatives
Box, Cloudinary, Dash, KontainerThree alternatives
Air, Kontainer, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAMFive alternatives
Canto, Cloudinary, Dash, ImageKit, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAMOne alternative
CantoGemini 3.5 FlashDashagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, WidenCantoChangedagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, BynderAir, Playbookagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, BynderFilecampagainst: Bynder, CantoCantoagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OpenText Media Managementagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Box, Bynder, CELUM, Dropbox, Extensis Portfolio, Google Drive, OneDrive, OpenText Media Management
Four alternatives
Air, Canto, Data Dwell, FilecampThree alternatives
Brandfolder, Dash, FilecampFour alternatives
Brandfolder, Canto, Filecamp, IconikFour alternatives
Adobe Bridge, Air.inc, Dash, ResourceSpaceFive alternatives
Air, Brandfolder, Bynder, ImageRelay, MediaValetPerplexity SonarCantoagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, BynderCantoHeldCantoagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, BynderFilecampagainst: Box, Cloudinaryno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
Five alternatives
Air, Box, Cloudinary, Dash, FilecampFour alternatives
Air, Cloudinary, Filecamp, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAMFive alternatives
Air, Cloudinary, Dash, Filecamp, MediaValetOne alternative
AirGrok 4.20Stockpress Essentialagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, DropboxFilecamp, Pics.ioChangedagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, Google Drive, PimcoreFilecampagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, Cloudinary, WediaResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Airtable, Dropbox, Google Drive, Oracleagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, Degoo
Four alternatives
Canto, Filecamp, MediaValet, Pics.ioFour alternatives
Canto, Daminion, MediaValet, Pics.ioFour alternatives
Box, Filecamp, Klyck, WrikeFour alternatives
Acquia DAM, Bynder, Canto, CloudinaryMistral SmallAir, CantoBynder, CantoChangedCanto, DashAir, Filecampagainst: Bynderno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Air, Bynder, MediaValet
One alternative
FilecampTwo alternatives
Bynder, MediaValetTwo alternatives
Canto, CloudinaryDeepSeek V4 FlashAiragainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Canto, MediaValetFilecampChangedAiragainst: Brandfolder, BynderFilecampagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoAir, Cloudinary, Dashagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Widen/Acquiaagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Bynder, Dropbox, Google Drive, MediaValet, OpenText Media Management, Widen
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, Pics.ioTwo alternatives
Canto, Pics.ioFour alternatives
Canto, Dash, Filecamp, Pics.ioThree alternatives
Brault, ResourceSpace, Stockpress EssentialOne alternative
Pics.ioLlama 4 MaverickAiragainst: BynderBynderChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Bynder
Three alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Canto, Kontainer DAM & PIMThree alternatives
Air, Dash, FilecampQwen 3.7 FlashCantoSpotFileChangedCantoagainst: BynderCanvano first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Google Drive, Hyland, Markestrak, Mayan EDMS, OpenText Media Management, Widen Collective
Three alternatives
Air, Klyck, MediaValetThree alternatives
Brandfile, Canto, MediaValetFour alternatives
Air.io, Brandfolder, MediaValet, Pics.ioThree alternatives
Cloudinary, Filecamp, NextcloudKimi K2Dashagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, BynderAir, FilecampChangedagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoDash, Pics.ioagainst: CantoFilecamp, Stockpress Essentialagainst: Airno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Photoshelter
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Canto, FilecampFive alternatives
Bynder, Daminion, Filecamp, MediaValet, Tagbox.ioOne alternative
ImageKitGLM 4.7 FlashXFilecampCantoChangedAir, Braultagainst: Brandfolder, Canto, MediaValetBrault, Filecampagainst: Air, ResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Bynder, Iconik, MediaValet
Four alternatives
Air, Canto, Cloudinary, MediaValetTwo alternatives
Dash, MediaValetFive alternatives
Dash, Filecamp, Frontify, Pics.io, Stockpress EssentialOne alternative
DashMiniMax M2.5Canto, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAMMediaValetChangedDash, Pics.ioFilecampno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Google Drive, Islandora
Three alternatives
Air, Bynder, DaminionTwo alternatives
Filecamp, Image RelayTwo alternatives
Air, CloudinaryFour alternatives
AtroDAM, Islandora, Pics.io, ResourceSpaceGPT-6 LunaFilecampFilecampHeldAirFilecampno first choiceagainst: Adobe Bridge, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Cloudinary, ResourceSpace
Two alternatives
Air, CantoOne alternative
DashThree alternatives
Canto, Dash, FilecampOne alternative
ResourceSpaceMuse Glimmer 30BAir, CantoCantoChangedCloudinary, Filecampagainst: Adobe Bridge, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Box, MediaValetAir, Braultno first choiceagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Frontify
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, DashThree alternatives
Air, Baseline, DashFour alternatives
Canto, Dash, Kontainer, Plytix Cloud PIM & DAMFour alternatives
Cloudinary, Dash, Filecamp, ResourceSpaceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:14 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:44 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:31 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 25 | 94 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 9 | 56 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 22 | 115 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:40 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 13 | 109 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:22 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:08 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 14 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 14 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:39 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:04 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 22 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 18 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
OpenText read as OpenText Media Management
Plytix read as Plytix Cloud PIM & DAM
Unresolved, counted raw
Air.io (Air)
Baseline
Brandfile
Hyland
ImageRelay
Kontainer DAM & PIM
Markestrak
Mayan EDMS
Microsoft One Drive
Oracle
Pickit Business
SpotFile
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.