November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › Marketing › Email deliverability › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Email deliverability and testing tools for small business buyers

Asked as “email deliverability tool”, and as “inbox placement and email testing platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Sender 12%
25GlockApps12Sender11Instantly52others

25% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.GlockApps held the lead, +1 point on 24%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the November 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GlockApps25%6%54accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 25%
02Sender12%0%10accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 12%
03Instantly11%0%15accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 5% → 11%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 11%
04Mail-Tester7%6%35accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%
05Google Postmaster Tools Lab in the set5%0%36accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 10% → 5%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 5%
06MXToolbox5%3%37accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%
07MailerLite5%0%11accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
08MailReach4%5%21accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
09Brevo4%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
10Unspam.email2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Litmus2%59%22criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Email on Acid0%29%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Mailtrap Email Sandbox0%14%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12ZeroBounce0%5%22accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
14Microsoft SNDS0%0%12accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Postmaster Tools is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models three times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
G05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
M14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01GlockApps25%
02Sender12%
03Instantly11%
04Mail-Tester7%
05Google Postmaster Tools5%
06MXToolbox5%
07MailerLite5%
08MailReach4%
09Brevo4%
10Unspam.email2%
11Litmus2%
12ZeroBounce0%
13Mailtrap Email Sandbox0%
14Microsoft SNDS0%
15Email on Acid0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Litmus
59%
13 of 22 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Don't Buy: High-End Testing Suites (Too Soon) Tools like Litmus or Pardot ... for a small business, buying them early is a waste of capital.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Email on Acid
29%
4 of 14 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Neither Litmus nor Email on Acid can tell you if your email avoids spam filters, lands in the primary inbox” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Everest
80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Tools like GlockApps, Everest, and others rely on seed lists... paying for these when you could test directly to your own Gmail/Outlook accounts may be wasteful.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Validity Everest
62%
5 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“High-Cost Enterprise Suites (Overkill / Financial Trap) * Examples: *Validity Everest (formerly Return Path / 250ok)*” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 799 links across 213 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

29 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Unspam25 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prospeo21 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · MyEmailVerifier21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GlockApps19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Saleshandy16 answers · 16 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mailgun14 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mailtrap13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email deliverability tool”, “email deliverability tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
GlockApps glockapps.com25%1441,60038,6471
Sender sender.net12%759,90010,34969,07813
Instantly instantly.ai11%10774,00087,94459,881$98617
MailTester mailtester.com
Mail-Tester 7%, MailTester 2%
9%625,400933,4964
Google parent site
Google Postmaster Tools 5%
5%836,60024
MXToolbox mxtoolbox.com5%7560,500126453,57018
MailerLite mailerlite.com5%15049,50031159,716$85115
MailReach mailreach.co4%561,300512,483112
Brevo brevo.com4%44040,50032781,741$17,847106
Unspam.email unspam.email2%20

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best email deliverability tool” is devopsschool.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email deliverability tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which inbox placement and email testing platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top email deliverability and testing tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email deliverability tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an email deliverability tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email deliverability and testing tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice250ok, LitmusChanged
One alternativeReturn Path
Mail-Tester, Unspam.email
Eight alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, MXToolbox, MailReach, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Saleshandy Inbox Radar, Warmforge
Brevo, Moosend
Four alternativesGlock Apps, HubSpot, MailerLite, Warmbox
no first choiceagainst: Email on Acid, Kickbox, Litmus, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Spamcheck
GPT-5.4 miniInstantly
Two alternativesBouncer, Brevo
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesMailosaur, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Validity Engage
Litmus
Four alternativesEmail on Acid, GlockApps, InboxAlly, Postmark
MailerLite
Three alternativesGMass, Gmail Postmaster Tools, Instantly
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashInstantly, Smartlead
Three alternativesEasyDMARC, GlockApps, MailReach
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesEmail on Acid, Folderly, MailReach
against: Litmus, Return Path, Validity Everest
Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Five alternativesEmail on Acid, GlockApps, Lemwarm, Mail-Tester, Warmup Inbox
Instantly
Seven alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MillionVerifier, Smartlead, Warmup Inbox
no first choiceagainst: Everest, Validity Everestagainst: Email on Acid, Litmus, Validity Everest
Perplexity SonarMailerCheck
Six alternativesEasyDMARC, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, NeverBounce, ZeroBounce
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesMailReach, Mailslurp, Salesforge Inbox Placement Test
against: Everest, Litmus
Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox
Six alternativesGlockApps, Litmus, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS, Unspam.email, ZeroBounce
Sender
Four alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, MailReach, MailerCheck
no first choiceagainst: Mailgun Optimize, Mailpit, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Validity Engage
Grok 4.20GlockApps
Four alternativesBrevo, Instantly, MXToolbox, MailReach
against: SendGrid
GlockAppsHeld
Four alternativesLitmus, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Unspam.email
MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
Four alternativesGlockApps, MailReach, Unspam.email, ZeroBounce
Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
Five alternativesBrevo, GlockApps, MailerLite, Microsoft SNDS, Sender
no first choiceagainst: Emailwarmup.com, GlockApps, Inbox Monster, Mail-Tester, MailReach, NeverBounce, Return Path, Validity Everest
Mistral SmallGlockApps, MailerLite
One alternativeInstantly
GlockAppsChanged
Two alternativesFolderly, Instantly
GlockApps
Six alternativesEmail on Acid, Folderly, Litmus, MXToolbox, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, ZeroBounce
Sender
Three alternativesBrevo, MailerLite, Moosend
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashInstantly
Three alternativesGlockApps, MailReach, ZeroBounce
GlockAppsChanged
Four alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MailReach, Unspam.email, ZeroBounce
GlockApps
Six alternativesEmail on Acid, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Unspam.email
against: Litmus
Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
Three alternativesEasyDMARC, Email Detective, Unspam.email
no first choice
Three alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, PowerDMARC
against: Everest, GlockApps, MailerCheck
Llama 4 MaverickSenderno first choiceChangedno first choiceMailerLite
Four alternativesMail-Tester, MailGenius, Sender, Unspam
no first choiceagainst: MailerCheck
Qwen 3.7 FlashInstantly, Lemlist
Four alternativesEasyDMARC, GlockApps, MailReach, Sender
WarmyChanged
Three alternativesGlockApps, Instantly, Unspam.email
GlockApps, Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Four alternativesFolderly, MailGenius, Unspam, ZeroBounce
Sender
Five alternativesBrevo, Email Detective, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, MailerLite
against: Validity Everest
GlockApps, MailTester
Eight alternativesAmazon SES, Instantly, Lemlist, Mailgun, Postmark, Resend, ValidSend, Warmbox
against: Litmus, Oracle Responsys, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Kimi K2MailReach
Three alternativesGlockApps, MXToolbox, ZeroBounce
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, Mail-Tester, MailReach
against: Litmus
Brevo, Mailgun
Seven alternativesEmail on Acid, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Mail-Tester, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, SendGrid, ZeroBounce
against: Litmus, Mailchimp
Unspam.email
Four alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, GMass, Klaviyo, MillionVerifier, Seamless.AI, ZeroBounce
GLM 4.7 FlashXGlockApps
One alternativeMailReach
against: Everest, Mailtrap Email Sandbox
GlockAppsHeld
Seven alternativesInbox Monster, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailGenius, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Testi, Unspam
against: Email on Acid, Litmus
GlockApps
Seven alternativesEmail on Acid, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Mailgun, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS
against: Litmus
EasyDMARC, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
Six alternativesAmazon SES, Brevo, Constant Contact, GlockApps, MailerLite, Unspam.email
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Mailchimp
MiniMax M2.5Instantly
Two alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tool, MXToolbox
GlockAppsChanged
One alternativeMailTester
against: Litmus
GlockApps
Six alternativesEmail on Acid, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Prospeo, ZeroBounce
against: Litmus
Brevo, Sender
Four alternativesKit, MailerLite, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Unspam
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaGlockApps
Two alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MailReach
MailReachChanged
Two alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools
GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools
Four alternativesLitmus, Mail-Tester, Mailgun Inspect, Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Mail-Tester
Two alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, Postmark
against: GlockApps
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BSender
Six alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Mailgun, Postmark
Salesforge Inbox Placement Test, Unspam Inbox Placement TestChanged
Three alternativesGlockApps, Instantly Inbox Placement Tool, MXToolbox
GlockApps
Five alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS
against: Email on Acid, Litmus
Sender
Four alternativesGlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
no first choiceagainst: MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailGenius Mail Tester, aboutmy.email
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:39no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:26yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:51no014 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:14yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:02yes513 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:42yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:35yes1621 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:09yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:34yes539 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:08yes924 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:35yes1514 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:33yes532 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:27yes314 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:02yes1517 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:56no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:35yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:17yes922 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:02yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:07yes1312 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:38yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:14yes2426 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:09yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:00yes528 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:18yes1925 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:53yes2570 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:29yes1546 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:12yes212 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:59yes1321 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:42yes1611 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:26yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:57no016 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:39yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:19yes516 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:24yes910 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:12yes1622 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:22yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:49yes1051 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:16yes1523 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:32yes2566 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:31yes526 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:16yes721 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:23yes1526 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:52yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:54yes27 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:24yes1320 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:10yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:27yes1011 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:17yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:08yes1821 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:03yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:56yes525 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:40yes1320 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:48yes2568 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:36yes550 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:20yes517 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:38yes1322 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:21no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:48no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:52no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:55yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:00yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:28no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:26yes944 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:35yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:34no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:46yes2023 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:29yes1055 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:04no0107 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:53yes324 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:56yes1522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:51yes2412 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:15yes613 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:08yes919 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:51yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:15yes1011 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:43yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:26yes2422 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:11yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:40no034 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:41yes2581 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:33yes2546 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:44yes2466 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:21yes418 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:22yes2434 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Mailtrap read as Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Saleshandy read as Saleshandy Inbox Radar
Validity read as Validity Everest
Warmy.io read as Warmy
Unresolved, counted raw
Delivra
Emailwarmup.com
Emelia
Google Postmaster Tool
Instantly Inbox Placement Tool
Mail Slurp
MailGenius Mail Tester
Mailgun's deliverability testing
Mailosaur
Mailpit
Postmastery
Testi
Unspam Inbox Placement Test
ValidSend
WarmupInbox
WarmySender
aboutmy.email
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Ecommerce searchEmail marketing →