November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › Marketing › Email deliverability · November 2026 Edition

Email deliverability and testing tools

Asked as “email deliverability tool”, and as “inbox placement and email testing platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Google Postmaster Tools 10%
38GlockApps10Google Postmaster Tools10Sender42others

38% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.GlockApps held the lead, +4 points on 34%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the November 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GlockApps38%9%57endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.34% → 38%
02Google Postmaster Tools Lab in the set10%6%34accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 10%
03Litmus6%10%21accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
04ZeroBounce4%14%28accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
05MXToolbox2%6%32accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
06MailReach2%8%25accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
07Validity Everest2%22%32accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
08Mail-Tester2%19%27accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
09Folderly2%14%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
10Mailgun2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
19Instantly0%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12Mailtrap Email Sandbox0%13%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
18Kickbox0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16NeverBounce0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
17Warmup Inbox0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
15EasyDMARC0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Email on Acid0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Microsoft SNDS0%0%17accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
13SendForensics0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Postmaster Tools is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
G02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
M11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01GlockApps38%
02Google Postmaster Tools10%
03Litmus6%
04ZeroBounce4%
05MXToolbox2%
06MailReach2%
07Validity Everest2%
08Mail-Tester2%
09Folderly2%
10Mailgun2%
11Microsoft SNDS0%
12Mailtrap Email Sandbox0%
13SendForensics0%
14Email on Acid0%
15EasyDMARC0%
16NeverBounce0%
17Warmup Inbox0%
18Kickbox0%
19Instantly0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Validity Everest
22%
7 of 32 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Unnecessary enterprise tools (Validity Everest, etc.) unless you're at scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
GlockApps
9%
5 of 57 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Seed-list placement testers such as GlockApps, Unspam, or similar tools: useful for directional comparisons, but test accounts do not behave like real subscribers” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Mail-Tester
19%
5 of 27 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Mail-Tester does one thing well: it runs your email through SpamAssassin and checks your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. That's useful. It's also not enough.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
ZeroBounce
14%
4 of 28 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Address-verification services such as ZeroBounce, Kickbox, or comparable vendors: treat results as risk estimates, not proof of consent” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 857 links across 204 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Unspam24 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GlockApps23 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mailtrap16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MyEmailVerifier15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MailTester14 answers · 51 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Prospeo14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Omnisend12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email deliverability tool”, “email deliverability tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
GlockApps glockapps.com38%1441,60038,6471
Google parent site
Google Postmaster Tools 10%
10%836,60024
Sender sender.net10%759,90010,34969,07813
Litmus litmus.com6%5612,1002,31038,53315
ZeroBounce zerobounce.net4%2509,90011838,183$778120
Allegrow allegrow.co4%11
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Sales Hub 4%
4%687368,0009,776
Validity validity.com
Validity Everest 2%, Validity Engage 2%
4%73140024,467 company$264120
Unspam unspam.email
Unspam.email 2%, Unspam 2%
4%20
MXToolbox mxtoolbox.com2%7560,500126453,57018

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mailtester.com). The first result for “best email deliverability tool” is devopsschool.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email deliverability tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which inbox placement and email testing platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top email deliverability and testing tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email deliverability tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an email deliverability tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email deliverability and testing tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Warmy
Four alternativesAct-On, GlockApps, MailReach, Mailtrap Email Marketing
MailReachChanged
Three alternativesFolderly, GlockApps, Warmy
Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Five alternativesFolderly, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, MailReach
Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox
One alternativeGlockApps
no first choiceagainst: Folderly, GlockApps, Guerrilla Mail, Mail-Tester, Mailinator, Temp Mail
GPT-5.4 miniLitmus
Four alternativesBrevo, HubSpot, Salesforce/Marketing Cloud, ZeroBounce
GlockApps, LitmusChangedGlockApps, Litmus
Six alternativesEasyDMARC, Email on Acid, InboxAlly, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce
against: Google Postmaster Tools
Mailgun, Postmarkno first choiceagainst: Mailtrap Email Sandbox, www.mail-tester.com
Gemini 3.5 FlashGlockApps
Five alternativesFolderly, Google Postmaster Tools, Mailgun Optimize, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) / Microsoft 365 Admin Insights
against: Validity Everest
LitmusChanged
Two alternativesEmail on Acid, GlockApps
against: Validity Everest
Folderly, GlockApps
Seven alternativesEmail on Acid, Litmus, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, NeverBounce, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce
Google Postmaster Tools
Nine alternativesDeBounce, GlockApps, Instantly, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Smartlead, TrulyInbox, Warmup Inbox, ZeroBounce
against: Inbox Monster, Validity Everest
no first choiceagainst: SpamAssassin
Perplexity SonarGlockApps
Eight alternativesEasyDMARC, Google Postmaster Tools, MailReach, Microsoft SNDS, NeverBounce, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce, dmarcian
GlockAppsHeld
Five alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MailReach, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS, Validity Everest
GlockApps
Fourteen alternativesEasyDMARC, Email on Acid, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, MXToolbox, MailReach, Mailgun Optimize, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS, NeverBounce, Validity Everest, Warmup Inbox, ZeroBounce, dmarcian
Sender
Four alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailerCheck
no first choiceagainst: GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Heatwave, Kickbox, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, Unspam, ZeroBounce
Grok 4.20GlockApps
Two alternativesAllegrow, Validity Everest
GlockAppsHeld
Four alternativesFolderly, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Unspam.email, ZeroBounce
against: Return Path, Validity Everest
GlockApps, MXToolbox
Eleven alternativesEasyDMARC, Google Postmaster Tools, Inbox Monster, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Mailtrap Email Delivery Platform, SendForensics, Sender Score, Unspam.email, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce Deliverability
Google Postmaster Tools
Three alternativesBrevo, GlockApps, MXToolbox
against: Instantly, Warmy
no first choice
Six alternativesGlockApps, Inbox Radar, Postmark, Saleshandy Inbox Radar, SendGrid, Warmup Inbox
against: EasyDMARC, EmailDeliverability.com, Instantly, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Mailwarm, Sender Score, Warmy
Mistral SmallAllegrow, Validity Everest
One alternativeLitmus
against: Clearout, ZeroBounce
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, Prospeo, ZeroBounce
GlockApps, Validity Everest
Five alternativesEmail on Acid, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, Mail-Tester, Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Sender
Two alternativesMailerLite, Prospeo
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot Sales Hub
Seven alternativesGlockApps, Klaviyo, Lemlist, Mailgun, Outreach, Salesloft, SendGrid
GlockAppsChanged
Two alternativesFolderly, ZeroBounce
against: Litmus
GlockApps
Ten alternativesEasyDMARC, Email on Acid, Folderly, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce
Unspam.email
Six alternativesEmail Detective, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Mail-Tester, Sender, Warmup Inbox
GlockApps
Five alternativesEasyDMARC, Google Postmaster Tools, Microsoft SNDS, ZeroBounce, dmarcian
against: Everest, Validity Everest
against: Email List Validation, GlockApps, Mail-Tester
Llama 4 MaverickGlockApps
Two alternativesMailReach, Validity Everest
no first choiceChangedno first choiceSenderValidity Engagenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashGlockApps, ZeroBounce
Six alternativesKickbox, NeverBounce, Red Sift OnDMARC, SendForensics, Suped, Validity Everest
FolderlyChanged
Two alternativesGlockApps, Unspam.email
Google Postmaster Tools, MailerCheck
Four alternativesGlockApps, Litmus, MX Toolbox, Mailtrap Email Sandbox
no first choice
Eight alternativesEasyDMARC, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail Genius, Mail-Tester, Microsoft SNDS, Unspam
no first choicenothing named
Kimi K2Allegrow
Two alternativesGlockApps, MailReach
GlockAppsChanged
One alternativeSendForensics
against: Email on Acid, Litmus
no first choice
Seven alternativesEmail Industries, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Validity Everest
Mail-Tester, Unspam
Three alternativesMailchimp, MailerCheck, ZeroBounce
no first choiceagainst: Email List Validation, Mailinator, MyEmailVerifier, NeverBounce, TempMail, ZeroBounce
GLM 4.7 FlashXGlockApps
Two alternativesAllegrow, MailReach
GlockAppsHeld
Two alternativesEmail on Acid, Instantly
no first choice
Twelve alternativesEmail Detective, GlockApps, Google Postmaster Tools, Kickbox, Litmus, MXToolbox, Mailgun Validate, NeverBounce, Postmark DMARC Digests, SendForensics, Validity Everest, ZeroBounce
Google Postmaster Tools
Six alternativesConstant Contact, Folderly, Kickbox, MXToolbox, Mail‑Tester, Moosend
against: GlockApps, Instantly, Lemlist, Validity Everest, Warmup Inbox
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Sales Hub, ZeroBounce
Three alternativesCopper, GlockApps, MXToolbox
GlockAppsChanged
Three alternativesLitmus, MailReach, Validity Everest
GlockApps, SendForensics
Six alternativesEmail on Acid, Folderly, Litmus, MXToolbox, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Unspam.email
Sender
Four alternativesInstantly, MXToolbox, MyEmailVerifier, Warmup Inbox
against: ZeroBounce
no first choiceagainst: Folderly, Lemwarm standalone
GPT-6 LunaGlockApps
Two alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, Validity Engage
GlockAppsHeld
One alternativeValidity Engage
GlockApps
Seven alternativesEmail on Acid, Google Postmaster Tools, Litmus, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, Microsoft SNDS, Validity Engage, ZeroBounce
Google Postmaster Tools
One alternativeGlockApps
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BGlockApps, MailGenius
Two alternativesAllegrow, Amplemarket
GlockAppsChanged
Six alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Microsoft SNDS, Yahoo Sender Hub
against: Validity Everest
GlockApps
Eight alternativesEasyDMARC, Email Detective, Google Postmaster Tools, Mail-Tester, PowerDMARC, Unspam, Warmup Inbox, ZeroBounce
Sender
Three alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox, Mail-Tester
no first choice
Two alternativesGoogle Postmaster Tools, MXToolbox
against: GlockApps, Mail-Tester, MailReach, Mailgun, Mailtrap Email Sandbox, SendGrid
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:12yes199 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:55yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:48yes1321 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:26yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:43yes1229 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:17yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:55no012 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:13yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:59yes2030 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:53yes2029 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:10yes1544 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:29yes524 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:21yes313 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:09yes2028 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:34yes1910 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:27yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:52no019 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:39yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:24yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:12yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:42yes2422 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:25yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:05yes529 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:16yes2526 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:39yes2451 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:27yes2442 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:24yes215 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:09yes1520 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:50yes1812 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:37yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:58no016 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:54yes108 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:35yes517 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:32yes1010 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:22yes2532 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:47yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:27no028 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:14yes1023 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:13yes1432 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:44yes2455 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:38yes823 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:28yes1523 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:11yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:24yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:22yes719 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:53yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:21yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:18yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:54yes1824 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:44yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:01yes521 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:30yes514 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:53yes1572 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:32yes1456 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:36yes310 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:19yes1222 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:23no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:24no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:52no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:44yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:18yes515 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:21no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:34yes1935 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:44yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:27no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:39no063 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:18yes1542 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:00no012 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:38yes315 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:29yes1317 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:38yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:41yes66 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:21no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:06yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:06yes1515 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:42yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:18yes2544 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:40yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:15yes2049 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:27yes2529 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:02yes23129 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:25yes2571 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:52yes525 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:45yes2540 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Mailtrap read as Mailtrap Email Sandbox
Validity read as Validity Everest
Validity (Everest) read as Validity Everest
Validity (Return Path) read as Validity Everest
Validity (formerly Return Path) read as Validity Everest
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS SES Sandbox
DMARC Analyzer
Data Axle Inboxable
Email Sandbox
Getsitecontrol Email Quality Checker
Glide Data
Guerrilla Mail
HELO
Heatwave
Inbox Tracker
Inky
Lemwarm standalone
Mail Genius
MailCharts
MailSoar
MailTester.com
Mailcheck.io
Mailhog
Mailivery
Mailtrap Email Delivery Platform
Mail‑Tester
Microsoft Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) / Microsoft 365 Admin Insights
PlusVibe
ReturnPath
Salesforce/Marketing Cloud
Suped
Temp Mail
TempMail
ZeroBounce Deliverability
www.mail-tester.com
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Ecommerce searchEmail marketing →