November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › Marketing › Email marketing · November 2026 Edition

Email marketing platforms

Asked as “email marketing platform”, and as “email marketing tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.

Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.

Standing · first-choice share
42%
42HubSpot Marketing Hub26ActiveCampaign11Brevo21others

42% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.HubSpot Marketing Hub held the lead, +7 points on 35%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the November 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01HubSpot Marketing Hub42%7%60endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.35% → 42%
02ActiveCampaign26%8%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 28% → 26%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 26%
03Brevo11%5%55accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 11%
04Zoho Campaigns11%7%15accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.0% → 11%
05MailerLite8%10%29accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%
06Sender2%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Adobe Marketo Engage0%55%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Constant Contact0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Mailchimp0%42%55criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12Kit0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Klaviyo0%25%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11GetResponse0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Omnisend0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Customer.io0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01HubSpot Marketing Hub42%
02ActiveCampaign26%
03Brevo11%
04Zoho Campaigns11%
05MailerLite8%
06Sender2%
07Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement0%
08Klaviyo0%
09Omnisend0%
10Customer.io0%
11GetResponse0%
12Kit0%
13Mailchimp0%
14Adobe Marketo Engage0%
15Constant Contact0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Mailchimp
42%
23 of 55 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Criticized for billing practices... Not recommended for use with purchased email lists” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Adobe Marketo Engage
55%
12 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“enterprise suites like Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Oracle Eloqua or Adobe Marketo Engage carry licensing costs and implementation complexity” Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt
Constant Contact
53%
8 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Mentioned as a platform to avoid due to negative user experiences, including billing issues and limited features.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Klaviyo
25%
8 of 32 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“For pure B2B, avoid overly e-commerce-focused tools like Klaviyo or Omnisend” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 684 links across 214 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

31 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hostinger20 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Braze20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sequenzy17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mailchimp14 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mailtrap14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra12 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Brevo11 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email marketing platform”, “email marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Marketing Hub 42%
42%991368,0009,776
ActiveCampaign activecampaign.com26%43718,100307235,709$1,42432
Brevo brevo.com
Brevo 11%, Brevo [formerly Sendinblue] 0%
11%44040,50032781,741$17,8471069
Zoho parent site
Zoho Campaigns 11%
11%535,40058
MailerLite mailerlite.com8%15049,50031159,716$851157
Sender sender.net2%759,90010,34969,07813
Salesforce parent site
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement 0%
0%127550,00060,632
Klaviyo klaviyo.com0%36590,5001,560200,057$57220
Omnisend omnisend.com0%1999,90010851,545$11366
Customer.io customer.io0%2182,90017415,750$6,920112

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 11 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brevo.com, emailtooltester.com, mailchimp.com, mailtrap.io). The first result for “best email marketing platform” is emailvendorselection.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email marketing platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which email marketing tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top email marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email marketing platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an email marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email marketing platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing HubActiveCampaignChanged
Two alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub
no first choiceMailerLite
Three alternativesBrevo, EmailOctopus, Moosend
no first choiceagainst: Mailchimp
GPT-5.4 miniHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
One alternativeActiveCampaign
Mailchimp
Six alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo
Brevo, MailerLite
One alternativeSender
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Customer.io, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Brevo, Mailchimp, Oracle Eloqua
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Customer.io, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Mailchimp, MailerLite
Klaviyo
Five alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Mailchimp
MailerLite
Four alternativesBrevo, Moosend, Omnisend, Sender
against: Mailchimp
no first choice
Six alternativesBraze, Customer.io, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Iterable, Klaviyo, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Constant Contact, Kit, Mailchimp
Perplexity SonarHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Oracle Eloqua
ActiveCampaignChanged
One alternativeHubSpot Marketing Hub
no first choice
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite
against: Adobe Campaign, Braze, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Brevo
Four alternativesEmailOctopus, MailerLite, Sender, Zoho Campaigns
against: Klaviyo
no first choiceagainst: Constant Contact, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
Grok 4.20ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Four alternativesBrevo, GetResponse, Mailchimp, Zoho Campaigns
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Klaviyo, Omnisend, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
ActiveCampaignChanged
Four alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, Zoho Campaigns
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Klaviyo, Omnisend, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Mailchimp, MailerLite
Three alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo
Zoho Campaigns
Four alternativesBrevo, EmailOctopus, MailerLite, Sender
against: Mailchimp
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo
against: Mailchimp, SendGrid
against: GetResponse, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, SendGrid, SendMails, Vertical Response
Mistral SmallHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Customer.io
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
ActiveCampaignChanged
Three alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, SalesTarget.ai
no first choiceHubSpot Marketing Hub, Zoho Campaigns
Five alternativesBrevo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Moosend, Sender
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Mailchimp, Vertical Response
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeActiveCampaign
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
ActiveCampaignChanged
Four alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
no first choice
Eight alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Omnisend
Brevo
Four alternativesEmailOctopus, Kit, MailerLite, Sender
against: Mailchimp
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, Braze, Brevo, Insider
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Mailchimp, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
against: ActiveCampaign, MailPoet, Mailchimp, Robly, SendGrid, SendMails
Llama 4 MaverickHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Mailchimp
ActiveCampaignChanged
Three alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
no first choiceZoho Campaigns
Three alternativesBrevo, Mailchimp, Mailjet
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage, Brevo, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
Qwen 3.7 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
ActiveCampaignChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
no first choiceZoho Campaigns
Three alternativesBrevo, MailerLite, Sender
no first choiceagainst: AWeber, ActiveCampaign, Benchmark Email, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, VerticalResponse
Kimi K2HubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo
no first choiceBrevo
Three alternativesMailerLite, Sender, Zoho Campaigns
no first choiceagainst: Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Mailjet, SendGrid
GLM 4.7 FlashXActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeCustomer.io
against: Klaviyo, Mailchimp
ActiveCampaignChanged
Two alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub
no first choiceMailerLite, Zoho Campaigns
Two alternativesBrevo, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Gmail, Mailchimp, Outlook, Vertical Response, Yahoo Mail
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
ActiveCampaignChanged
Two alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
no first choiceBrevo, Zoho Campaigns
One alternativeOmnisend
against: Constant Contact, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Campaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloudagainst: AWeber, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, SendGrid
GPT-6 LunaHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
no first choice
Eight alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Omnisend
Sender
One alternativeBrevo
no first choiceagainst: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
Muse Glimmer 30BActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
One alternativeCustomer.io
no first choice
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo [formerly Sendinblue], Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Omnisend
Brevo
Three alternativesMailerLite, Sender, Zoho Campaigns
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloudagainst: Brevo formerly Sendinblue, Constant Contact, GetResponse, HubSpot email component only, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, SendGrid, Sender, Zoho Campaigns
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:17yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:32yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:22no016 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:32yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:09yes514 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:18yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:58yes1419 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:15yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:10yes526 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:32yes1023 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:34yes1522 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:18yes940 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:53yes316 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:19yes1524 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:59yes107 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:05yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:06no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:29yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:15yes57 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:48yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:28yes1319 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:53yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:41yes520 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:18yes1420 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:14yes1019 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:39yes517 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:15yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:34yes1115 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:12yes109 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:49yes77 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:12no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:05yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:38yes515 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:34yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:36yes2441 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:48yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:32no026 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:47yes1530 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:37yes936 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:36yes1028 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:47yes815 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:45yes1522 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:03yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:50yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:21no013 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:31yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:42yes58 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:15yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:19yes2524 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:47yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:57yes530 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:52yes513 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:20yes557 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:52yes520 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:20yes28 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:00yes1522 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:44no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:44no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:20no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:13yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:16yes1013 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:21no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:27yes2237 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:41yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:45yes1066 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:41yes1022 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:22yes1429 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:53no037 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:25yes214 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:58yes1421 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:32yes1911 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:01yes47 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:23no015 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:54yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:32yes914 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:37yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:14yes2524 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:12yes55 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:06yes1019 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:08yes2529 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:51yes1317 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:29yes1032 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:55yes320 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:39yes2020 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Campaign
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Marketing Hub) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Hubspot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Salesforce read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Acumbamail
Brevo formerly Sendinblue
Gmail
HubSpot email component only
MailPoet
SalesTarget.ai
VerticalResponse
Yahoo Mail
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Email deliverabilityEmail signatures →