Click fraud protection
Asked as “click fraud protection tool”, and as “invalid ad traffic blocker”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Lunio 13%
37ClickCease13Lunio08ClickGUARD42others
37% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.ClickCease held the lead, +1 point on 36%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Lunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseLunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ClickCease37%24%59endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.36% → 37%
ClickCease37%24%59endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.36% → 37%02Lunio13%14%36accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 13%
Lunio13%14%36accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 13%03
ClickGUARD8%8%38accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
ClickGUARD8%8%38accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%04
Cheq6%4%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Cheq6%4%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%05
Fraud Blocker6%10%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
Fraud Blocker6%10%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%06
TrafficGuard4%3%32accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
TrafficGuard4%3%32accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
ClickGuardian4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
ClickGuardian4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
ClickPatrol2%19%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
ClickPatrol2%19%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%09
Clixtell2%18%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Clixtell2%18%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Spider AF0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Spider AF0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ClickCease vs Fraud BlockerClickCease vs TrafficGuardClickCease vs ClickGuardianClickCease vs ClickPatrolLunio vs ClickGUARDLunio vs CheqLunio vs Fraud BlockerLunio vs TrafficGuardLunio vs ClickGuardianLunio vs ClickPatrolClickGUARD vs CheqClickGUARD vs Fraud BlockerClickGUARD vs TrafficGuardClickGUARD vs ClickGuardianClickGUARD vs ClickPatrolCheq vs Fraud BlockerCheq vs TrafficGuardCheq vs ClickGuardianCheq vs ClickPatrolFraud Blocker vs TrafficGuardFraud Blocker vs ClickGuardianFraud Blocker vs ClickPatrolTrafficGuard vs ClickGuardianTrafficGuard vs ClickPatrolClickGuardian vs ClickPatrol
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ClickCease37%
ClickCease37%02Lunio13%
Lunio13%03ClickGUARD8%
ClickGUARD8%04Cheq6%
Cheq6%05Fraud Blocker6%
Fraud Blocker6%06TrafficGuard4%
TrafficGuard4%07ClickGuardian4%
ClickGuardian4%08ClickPatrol2%
ClickPatrol2%09Clixtell2%
Clixtell2%10Spider AF0%
Spider AF0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ClickCease24%
14 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Account suspension risk: Multiple users report their Google Ads accounts being shut down for "circumventing systems" after installing ClickCease” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Lunio14%
5 of 36 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Complaints center on admin overhead (manual tweaks needed), questionable effectiveness, and not being "worth the hassle"” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ClickPatrol19%
4 of 21 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“The same limitation applies to the broader category that ClickCease, ClickGuard, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard and Lunio belong to” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
DoubleVerify60%
3 of 5 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid: DoubleVerify / IAS (Integral Ad Science) – ... typically overkill and too expensive for mid-sized B2B companies” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 853 links across 149 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Capterra33 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Software Advice31 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ClickCease28 answers · 48 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Lunio28 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · TrafficGuard26 answers · 33 citations · 13 models
vendor site · SourceForge24 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Spotsaas21 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ClickPatrol21 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ClickGuardian20 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GetApp20 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Software Advice19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ClickFortify18 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 5 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best click fraud protection tool”, “click fraud protection tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClickCease clickcease.com | 37% | 160 | 1,300 | 50 | 2,517 | $394,547 | 12 | 1 |
| Lunio lunio.ai | 13% | 108 | 590 | 11 | 5,727 | $4 | 21 | |
| Cheq cheq.ai Cheq 6%, CHEQ Acquisition 4% | 10% | 94 | 1,600 | 55 | 7,629 | $1,062 | 21 | |
| ClickGUARD clickguard.com | 8% | 103 | 320 | 5 | 8,212 | $44,456 | 7 | 6 |
| Fraud Blocker fraudblocker.com | 6% | 73 | 140 | 2 | 4,005 | 13 | 5 | |
| TrafficGuard trafficguard.ai TrafficGuard 4%, TrafficGuard Shield 2% | 6% | 102 | 720 | 8 | 1,152 | 18 | 3 | |
| ClickGuardian clickguardian.ai | 4% | 38 | 20 | 0 | 19 | 0 | ||
| ClickFortify clickfortify.com | 4% | 16 | ||||||
| ClickPatrol clickpatrol.com | 2% | 61 | 20 | 0 | 2,376 | 9 | ||
| Anura anura.io | 2% | 51 | 4,400 | 161 | 5,994 | 7 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 14 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, clickcease.com, sourceforge.net, trafficguard.ai). The first result for “best click fraud protection tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best click fraud protection tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which invalid ad traffic blocker would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top click fraud protection tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best click fraud protection tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a click fraud protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which click fraud protection tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ClickGUARD, ClickPatrolno first choiceChangedno first choiceFraud Blockerno first choiceagainst: AdTector, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker
Two alternatives
ClickCease, Spider AFFive alternatives
ClickCease, ClickClickBlock, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrol, ClixtellGPT-5.4 miniLunioLunioHeldTrafficGuardagainst: ClickPatrolClickGUARDagainst: ClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGuardian
Two alternatives
Cheq, ClickCeaseTwo alternatives
Cheq, Fraud BlockerFour alternatives
Cheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, LunioOne alternative
ClickPatrolGemini 3.5 FlashLunioagainst: ClickCeaseCheq, LunioChangedagainst: ClickCeaseClickCeaseFraud Blocker, TrafficGuardagainst: ClickCeaseno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuardOne alternative
ClickGUARDSix alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, DataDome, Fraud Blocker, Lunio, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickFortify, Cloudflare, DidvaPerplexity SonarCheqClickCeaseChangedClickCease / CHEQ EssentialsClickCeaseagainst: Luniono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ClickCease, LunioThree alternatives
Cheq, Lunio, TrafficGuardFive alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, Lunio, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickGuardian, Fraud BlockerGrok 4.20ClickCeaseagainst: CheqClickCeaseHeldClickCease, TrafficGuardAdTruthno first choiceagainst: Adjust, AppsFlyer, ClickCease, ClickPatrol, ClickSambo, Fraud Blocker, Lunio, PPC Protect
Two alternatives
ClickGUARD, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
Lunio, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, Fraud Blocker, Spider AFTwo alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGUARDSix alternatives
ClickCease, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuard, mFilterItMistral SmallClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldagainst: DataCops, SulvoClickCeaseClickGuardianno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker
Two alternatives
Cheq, Spider AFTwo alternatives
Fraud Blocker, LunioFour alternatives
AppsFlyer Protect360, ClickGUARD, IPQS, Spider AFTwo alternatives
Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardDeepSeek V4 FlashClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldagainst: LunioClickCeaseClixtell Click Fraud Protectionno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Securityagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, PPC Protect
Two alternatives
ClickGUARD, LunioThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardEight alternatives
Anura, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, Lunio, PPC Protect, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickPatrol, Fraud BlockerLlama 4 MaverickClickCeaseLunioChangedClickCeaseClickFortifyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ClickCease, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickGUARD, Spider AFThree alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClixtellQwen 3.7 FlashClickCeaseagainst: LunioClickCeaseHeldClickCeaseClickCease, Fraud BlockerClickCeaseagainst: ClickGuardian
One alternative
TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
Fraud Blocker, LunioThree alternatives
AdFraud007, FraudScore, VoluumTwo alternatives
Improvely, Spider AFFour alternatives
ClickGUARD, HUMAN Security, Spider AF, TrafficGuardKimi K2ClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldagainst: DoubleVerify, Fraudlogix, IASClickCeaseClickFortify, ClickGuardianno first choiceagainst: ClickCease
Two alternatives
ClickGUARD, PPC ProtectTwo alternatives
Anura, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, Lunio, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
Fraud Blocker, Google Ads Built-In ProtectionsGLM 4.7 FlashXClickGUARDTrafficGuardChangedagainst: DoubleVerify, Integral Ad Science, PerimeterX Bot DefenderClickCease, ClickGUARDClixtellagainst: ClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: Adjust, AppsFlyer, ClickCease
Three alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGuardian, TrafficGuardOne alternative
Fraud Blocker™Five alternatives
ClickPatrol, DataDome, Lunio, Spider AF, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickFortify, ClickPatrolMiniMax M2.5ClickCease, ClickGUARDLunioChangedClickCeaseClickReportAnura, Cheq, DataDome, Lunioagainst: DoubleVerify, Integral Ad Science
Two alternatives
Cheq, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickGUARD, TrafficGuardSix alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, DataDome Ad Protect, Lunio, Spider AF, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
Click Fraud Free, ClickCease, ClickPatrol, Fraud BlockerGPT-6 LunaCHEQ Acquisitionagainst: ClickCeaseCHEQ AcquisitionHeldClickCease, ClickGUARDTrafficGuard Shieldno first choiceagainst: ClickCease
One alternative
LunioOne alternative
LunioFour alternatives
Cheq, ClickPatrol, Lunio, TrafficGuardOne alternative
Google AdsMuse Glimmer 30BClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldCheq, ClickCeaseClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Lunio, TrafficGuard
Four alternatives
Fraud Blocker, IPQualityScore, Lunio, TrafficGuardOne alternative
LunioThree alternatives
Anura, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuardFive alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrol, Clixtell, Fraud BlockerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 23 | 81 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:13 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 10 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:01 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 15 | 159 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:25 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 18 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:13 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google read as Google Ads
Unresolved, counted raw
AdFraud007
AdTruth
AdVerif
AppsFlyer Protect360
ClickClickBlock
ClickPatrol Free Tools
Fail2Ban
Forensiq
Fraud Blocker™
GeoEdge
Google Ads Built-In Protections
Google Ads built-in tools
Google Ads' built-in protection
IPQualityScore
Meetrics
Namogoo
PerimeterX Bot Defender
SAS Fraud Management
ppc-waste-detector
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.