Click fraud protection for enterprise buyers
Asked as “click fraud protection tool”, and as “invalid ad traffic blocker”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Cheq 21%
25Lunio21Cheq16TrafficGuard39others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Lunio held the lead, −14 points on 39%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Lunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseLunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Lunio25%6%51accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.39% → 25%
Lunio25%6%51accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.39% → 25%02
Cheq21%9%54accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 31% → 21%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.31% → 21%
Cheq21%9%54accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 31% → 21%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.31% → 21%03
TrafficGuard16%17%46accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 16%
TrafficGuard16%17%46accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 16%04
ClickGUARD5%44%27criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
ClickGUARD5%44%27criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%05ClickCease5%47%43criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
ClickCease5%47%43criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%06
Fraud Blocker5%62%13criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
Fraud Blocker5%62%13criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%07
DataDome4%6%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
DataDome4%6%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
HUMAN Security4%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
HUMAN Security4%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%09
Anura2%8%40accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Anura2%8%40accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
DoubleVerify2%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
DoubleVerify2%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
ClickPatrol0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ClickPatrol0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Clixtell0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Clixtell0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Spider AF0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Spider AF0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ClickCease vs Fraud BlockerClickCease vs TrafficGuardClickCease vs ClickGuardianClickCease vs ClickPatrolLunio vs ClickGUARDLunio vs CheqLunio vs Fraud BlockerLunio vs TrafficGuardLunio vs ClickGuardianLunio vs ClickPatrolClickGUARD vs CheqClickGUARD vs Fraud BlockerClickGUARD vs TrafficGuardClickGUARD vs ClickGuardianClickGUARD vs ClickPatrolCheq vs Fraud BlockerCheq vs TrafficGuardCheq vs ClickGuardianCheq vs ClickPatrolFraud Blocker vs TrafficGuardFraud Blocker vs ClickGuardianFraud Blocker vs ClickPatrolTrafficGuard vs ClickGuardianTrafficGuard vs ClickPatrolClickGuardian vs ClickPatrol
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Lunio25%
Lunio25%02Cheq21%
Cheq21%03TrafficGuard16%
TrafficGuard16%04ClickGUARD5%
ClickGUARD5%05ClickCease5%
ClickCease5%06Fraud Blocker5%
Fraud Blocker5%07DataDome4%
DataDome4%08HUMAN Security4%
HUMAN Security4%09Anura2%
Anura2%10DoubleVerify2%
DoubleVerify2%11Spider AF0%
Spider AF0%12Clixtell0%
Clixtell0%13ClickPatrol0%
ClickPatrol0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ClickCease47%
20 of 43 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Tools to caution/avoid: Entry-level tools such as *ClickCease (CHEQ Essentials/Standard), Clixtell, PPC Shield, Fraud Blocker, Didva,* and *ClickGuard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ClickGUARD44%
12 of 27 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Tools to caution/avoid: Entry-level tools such as *ClickCease (CHEQ Essentials/Standard), Clixtell, PPC Shield, Fraud Blocker, Didva,* and *ClickGuard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Clixtell50%
8 of 16 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Tools to caution/avoid: Entry-level tools such as *ClickCease (CHEQ Essentials/Standard), Clixtell, PPC Shield, Fraud Blocker, Didva,* and *ClickGuard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ClickPatrol53%
8 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“not recommended for true enterprise deployments due to limited multi-domain management, weaker security credentials” DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 958 links across 164 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Lunio52 answers · 105 citations · 14 models
vendor site · ClickCease34 answers · 59 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Capterra33 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TrafficGuard31 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ClickFortify29 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 35 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Software Advice23 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ClickGuardian19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp18 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · ClickGUARD16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 13 models
27 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best click fraud protection tool”, “click fraud protection tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lunio lunio.ai | 25% | 108 | 590 | 11 | 5,727 | $4 | 21 | |
| Cheq cheq.ai Cheq 21%, CHEQ Acquisition 2%, CHEQ AI 2% | 25% | 94 | 1,600 | 55 | 7,629 | $1,062 | 21 | |
| TrafficGuard trafficguard.ai | 16% | 102 | 720 | 8 | 1,152 | 18 | 3 | |
| ClickGUARD clickguard.com | 5% | 103 | 320 | 5 | 8,212 | $44,456 | 7 | 6 |
| ClickCease clickcease.com | 5% | 160 | 1,300 | 50 | 2,517 | $394,547 | 12 | 1 |
| Fraud Blocker fraudblocker.com | 5% | 73 | 140 | 2 | 4,005 | 13 | 5 | |
| DataDome datadome.co | 4% | 44 | 1,900 | 33 | 15,592 | $364 | 120 | 4 |
| HUMAN Security humansecurity.com | 4% | 19 | 1,300 | 408 | 165,749 | 23 | 5 | |
| Anura anura.io | 2% | 51 | 4,400 | 161 | 5,994 | 7 | ||
| DoubleVerify doubleverify.com | 2% | 19 | 5,400 | 206 | 3,605 | 12 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 14 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, clickcease.com, clickguard.com, sourceforge.net, trafficguard.ai). The first result for “best click fraud protection tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best click fraud protection tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which invalid ad traffic blocker would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade click fraud protection tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best click fraud protection tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a click fraud protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which click fraud protection tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LunioFraud Blocker, Pixalate, WhiteOpsChangedAnura, Cheq, LunioClickGUARDagainst: ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuardno first choiceagainst: DataDome, HUMAN Securityagainst: ClickPatrol, Clixtell, TrafficGuard
Three alternatives
Cheq, DataDome, TrafficGuardOne alternative
ClickFortifyFour alternatives
ClickPatrol, DoubleVerify, HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardOne alternative
ClickGuardianTwo alternatives
Cheq, ClickCeaseGPT-5.4 miniCheqagainst: LunioDoubleVerify, HUMAN SecurityChangedHUMAN SecurityTrafficGuardagainst: ClickCeaseno first choicenothing named
One alternative
DataDomeSeven alternatives
Cheq, Click Custodian, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Clicksora, TrafficGuardGemini 3.5 FlashCheq, Lunioagainst: ClickCeaseLunioChangedCheq, LunioCHEQ Paradome, Luniono first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, Didva, Fraud Blocker, PPC Shield
One alternative
TrafficGuardThree alternatives
Cheq, HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
Anura, DataDome, HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardOne alternative
Anura.ioPerplexity SonarLunioCheqChangedagainst: ClickCeaseLunio, TrafficGuardClickGuardianno first choiceagainst: Anura, Cheq, ClickCease / CHEQ Essentials, ClickFortify, ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrol, Clixtell, DoubleVerify, Fraud0, Fraudlogix, HUMAN Security, IAS, Pixalate, TrafficGuard
Four alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDome, TrafficGuardOne alternative
LunioThree alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDomeFour alternatives
Cheq, ClickCease, Lunio, TrafficGuardGrok 4.20Lunioagainst: Anura, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, DataDome, Spider AF, TrafficGuardCheqChangedClickCease, ClickGUARDagainst: LunioDataDomeagainst: Anura, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, LunioAnura, Cheq, DataDome, Lunioagainst: ClickCease, PPC Protectagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, PPC Protect, Polygraph
One alternative
CheqOne alternative
IPQSFive alternatives
Cheq, Clixtell Click Fraud Protection, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuardOne alternative
CheqTwo alternatives
HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardMistral SmallClickCease, TrafficGuardLunioChangedClickCeaseCheq, Luniono first choiceagainst: ClickCease, Clixtell, Google Ads, Meta, Radware Bot Manager
One alternative
ClickGUARDThree alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDomeFive alternatives
DataDome, DoubleVerify, Fraudlogix, Lunio, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
Anura, DataDomeDeepSeek V4 FlashCheqagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARDLunioChangedLunioagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrolTrafficGuardagainst: ClickGuardianCheq, Lunioagainst: ClickCeaseagainst: Cheq, ClickCease, Clixtell
Three alternatives
Anura, DataDome Ad Protect, LunioFour alternatives
Anura, Cheq, HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardFive alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDome, HUMAN Security, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, Fraud BlockerTwo alternatives
Anura, DataDomeLlama 4 MaverickTrafficGuardno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Three alternatives
Anura, ClickGUARD, ClixtellQwen 3.7 FlashTrafficGuardCheqChangedLunioagainst: Cheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuardTrafficGuardagainst: Cheqno first choiceagainst: Akamai, Cheq, Cloudflare
Three alternatives
Anura, Cheq, ClixtellOne alternative
ClickCeaseThree alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDomeTwo alternatives
Anura, LunioKimi K2Cheqagainst: ClickCease, ClickFortify, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuardLunioChangedLunioClickCease, HUMAN Securityagainst: SpiderAFLunioagainst: ClickCeaseagainst: ClickCease, ClickFortify, ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrol, Clixtell, Fraud0, Google Ads, TrafficGuard
Three alternatives
Anura, DataDome, LunioTwo alternatives
Anura, TrafficGuardFive alternatives
Anura, Cheq, Clixtell, DataDome, TrafficGuardOne alternative
ClickFortifyThree alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDomeGLM 4.7 FlashXCheq, LunioCHEQ AIChangedCheq, LunioClickGUARDno first choiceagainst: Adjust, AppsFlyer, ClickCease, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker
Two alternatives
Clixtell, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickSambo, Fraudlogix, TrafficGuardFive alternatives
Adjust, Anura, AppsFlyer, DataDome, SingularFour alternatives
ClickCease, ClickPatrol, Clixtell, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
Anura, Cheq, DataDome, LunioMiniMax M2.5ClickCease, ClickGUARDno first choiceChangedClickCeaseFraud Blockerno first choiceagainst: ClickCease
One alternative
Spider AFThree alternatives
Cheq, ClickFortify, ClickSamboThree alternatives
ClickGuardian, SpiderAF, TrafficGuardGPT-6 LunaCheqCHEQ AcquisitionChangedCHEQ Acquisitionagainst: HUMAN Ad Click DefenseTrafficGuardagainst: Fraud Blockerno first choicenothing named
One alternative
LunioOne alternative
HUMAN SecurityFive alternatives
Anura, DataDome Ad Protect, Lunio, Spider AF, TrafficGuardMuse Glimmer 30BCHEQ Click Fraud Protection / ClickCease Enterprise, TrafficGuardTrafficGuardChangedTrafficGuardFraud Blockerno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol™, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, SAFEADS, Spider AF, TrafficGuard
One alternative
ClixtellThree alternatives
ClickCease, Integral Ad Science, LunioEight alternatives
Anura, Cheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, DataDome, Lunio, Spider AFSix alternatives
Anura, Cheq, ClickGuardian, DataDome, Lunio, TrafficGuard ShieldBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 9 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 17 | 107 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:25 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 17 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 22 | 82 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 25 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 15 | 108 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 24 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 14 | 73 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 15 | 69 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 28 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:00 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 22 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 12 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CHEQ.ai read as Cheq
Google read as Google Ads
HUMAN read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (formerly White Ops) read as HUMAN Security
Human (formerly WhiteOps) read as HUMAN Security
Unresolved, counted raw
AdLock Enterprise
Anura.io
Beacon
CHEQ Click Fraud Protection / ClickCease Enterprise
CHEQ Paradome
Cisco Umbrella
ClearTrust
Click Custodian
ClickPatrol™
CrowdStrike
FraudBlocker
HUMAN Ad Click Defense
Meta
Radware Bot Manager
SAFEADS
WhiteOps
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.