Review and reputation management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “online review management platform”, and as “reputation management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Reputation 25%
29Birdeye25Reputation08G2 Buyer Intent37others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Birdeye held the lead, +3 points on 26%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Praising.ai21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Praising.ai (21%) replaces NiceJob (15% then, 7% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Birdeye19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye29%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Praising.ai21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Praising.ai (21%) replaces NiceJob (15% then, 7% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketBirdeye19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye29%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Birdeye29%18%65accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.26% → 29%
Birdeye29%18%65accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.26% → 29%02
Reputation25%13%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 25%
Reputation25%13%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 25%03
Yext4%15%33accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Yext4%15%33accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%04
ReviewTrackers4%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
ReviewTrackers4%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%05
Trustpilot4%16%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Trustpilot4%16%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Bazaarvoice0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Bazaarvoice0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Podium0%33%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Podium0%33%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
SOCi0%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SOCi0%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Birdeye vs REVIEWS.ioBirdeye vs ReputationBirdeye vs ReviewTrackersBirdeye vs BrightLocalReviewflowz vs Brand24Reviewflowz vs TrustpilotReviewflowz vs REVIEWS.ioReviewflowz vs ReputationReviewflowz vs ReviewTrackersReviewflowz vs BrightLocalBrand24 vs TrustpilotBrand24 vs REVIEWS.ioBrand24 vs ReputationBrand24 vs ReviewTrackersBrand24 vs BrightLocalTrustpilot vs REVIEWS.ioTrustpilot vs ReputationTrustpilot vs ReviewTrackersTrustpilot vs BrightLocalREVIEWS.io vs ReputationREVIEWS.io vs ReviewTrackersREVIEWS.io vs BrightLocalReputation vs ReviewTrackersReputation vs BrightLocalReviewTrackers vs BrightLocal
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Birdeye29%
Birdeye29%02Reputation25%
Reputation25%03Yext4%
Yext4%04ReviewTrackers4%
ReviewTrackers4%05Trustpilot4%
Trustpilot4%06SOCi0%
SOCi0%07Podium0%
Podium0%08Bazaarvoice0%
Bazaarvoice0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Birdeye18%
12 of 65 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid: Birdeye and Bazaarvoice ... they do not publish transparent pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Reputation13%
8 of 60 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“independent reviews flag potentially infrequent reporting updates, delays in surfacing new reviews, and an older or less intuitive interface” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Podium33%
9 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Probably Avoid at Enterprise Scale: - Podium (contract lock-in, per-location pricing, cancellation issues)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Yext15%
5 of 33 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid platforms that only focus on Google and Facebook reviews (e.g., basic Yext or generic listing tools)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 942 links across 284 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
45 answers · 105 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Birdeye36 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Software Advice36 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Capterra29 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GetApp21 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Reputation14 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ReviewInc11 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Crazy Egg11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow9 answers · 9 citations · 4 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best online review management platform”, “online review management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birdeye birdeye.com | 29% | 355 | 22,200 | 380 | 6,787,611 | $1,735 | 110 | 2 |
| Reputation reputation.com | 25% | 121 | 40,500 | 271,545 | 42,552 | $8,985 | 11 | 8 |
| G2 Buyer Intent g2.com | 8% | 147 | 90 | 1 | 2,221,182 | 109 | 9 | |
| Yext yext.com | 4% | 259 | 14,800 | 460 | 34,231 | 20 | ||
| ReviewTrackers reviewtrackers.com | 4% | 53 | 1,300 | 6 | 26,906 | 0 | 5 | |
| Trustpilot trustpilot.com | 4% | 72 | 165,000 | 2,892 | 88,097,858 | 35 | ||
| Brandwatch brandwatch.com | 4% | 119 | 6,600 | 133 | 119,214 | $585 | 120 | |
| ReviewInc reviewinc.com | 4% | 12 | ||||||
| Reviewflowz reviewflowz.com | 4% | 29 | 170 | 0 | 2,034 | $467 | 11 | |
| Sprinklr sprinklr.com | 2% | 43 | 14,800 | 464 | 331,213 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (birdeye.com, reputation.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best online review management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best online review management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which reputation management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade review and reputation management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best online review management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an online review management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which review and reputation management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ReviewflowzReputationChangedBirdeyeYextagainst: Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: REVIEWS.io, Trustpilot, Yext
Two alternatives
Birdeye, ReputationThree alternatives
Birdeye, Meltwater, SprinklrThree alternatives
Caliber, Reputation, ReviewTrackersTwo alternatives
Reputation, ReviewGrowerGPT-5.4 miniG2 Buyer Intentagainst: BazaarvoiceBirdeyeChangedBirdeyeBirdeyeagainst: Yextno first choiceagainst: Podium, Trustpilot
Two alternatives
Birdeye, ReputationTwo alternatives
Reputation, YextFive alternatives
Partoo, Podium, Reputation, SOCi, YextTwo alternatives
Reputation, SOCiGemini 3.5 FlashG2 Buyer IntentSprinklr Unified CXMChangedReputationReputation, ReviewTrackersno first choiceagainst: Broadly, Chekkit, GatherUp, Grade.us, Medallia, NiceJob, Podium, Qualtrics, Swell, Trustpilot, Yelp for Business
Five alternatives
Gartner Peer Insights, Reputation, Reviewflowz, TrustRadius, TrustpilotFive alternatives
Brandwatch, G2 Marketing Solutions, Meltwater, Sprout Social, TrustRadiusFive alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Qualtrics, Sprinklr, YextThree alternatives
Birdeye, ReviewInc, SOCiPerplexity SonarReviewflowzBirdeyeChangedBirdeye, ReputationReputationagainst: Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: Brand24, Qualtrics, Reputation, Sprout Social
Three alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, SprinklrThree alternatives
Brandwatch, Hootsuite, TrustpilotSix alternatives
Brandwatch, Meltwater, Podium, ReviewTrackers, SOCi, YextOne alternative
BazaarvoiceGrok 4.20BirdeyeBrandwatchChangedBirdeyeBirdeyeBirdeye, Reputationagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Yext
Four alternatives
Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCi, YextFour alternatives
Brand24, Meltwater, Mention, ReputationFour alternatives
Podium, Reputation, SOCi, YextThree alternatives
Reputation, Trustpilot, YextFour alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Podium, ReviewTrackers, YextMistral SmallBirdeye, TrustpilotBirdeyeChangedBirdeye, ReputationReputationno first choiceagainst: Amazon, Capterra, G2 Buyer Intent, Google, Reputation, Walmart, Yelp for Business
Two alternatives
Reputation, ReviewTrackersTwo alternatives
Brand24, ReputationSix alternatives
Feefo, Podium, SOCi, Sprinklr Social, Trustpilot, YextDeepSeek V4 FlashG2 Marketing Solutions, ReputationReputationChangedBirdeye, Reputationagainst: PodiumReputationagainst: Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: AppTweak, Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, ClearlyRated, Grade.us, Hootsuite, Podium, Sprout Social
Four alternatives
Birdeye, Reviewflowz, TrustRadius, TrustpilotThree alternatives
Birdeye, Brandwatch, SOCiFour alternatives
ReviewTrackers, SOCi, Uberall, YextLlama 4 MaverickReputationno first choiceChangedno first choiceReviewGrowerno first choiceagainst: Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Reputation
Three alternatives
Alchemer Reputation Management, Birdeye, TrustpilotQwen 3.7 FlashYextBirdeyeChangedBirdeyeEmbedMyReviewsagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Trustpilotno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Birdeye, TrustRadius, TrustpilotTwo alternatives
Reputation, Sprout SocialFour alternatives
Medallia, Reputation, ReviewPro, YotpoOne alternative
ChatmeterKimi K2BirdeyeSprinklrChangedBirdeyeReputationBirdeyeagainst: Podiumagainst: Birdeye, BrightLocal, GatherUp, Podium, Reputation
Four alternatives
G2 Marketing Solutions, Reputation, SOCi, YextThree alternatives
Birdeye, Glassdoor Employer Solutions, ReputationFive alternatives
Reputation, SOCi, Sprinklr, Trustpilot, YextThree alternatives
Birdeye, Cacao, ReviewIncOne alternative
Sprout SocialGLM 4.7 FlashXBirdeyeBirdeyeHeldno first choiceReputationagainst: Bazaarvoice, Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Grade.us, ReputationStacker, ReviewGrower, ReviewTrackers, Yext
Three alternatives
G2 Buyer Intent, Reputation, TrustpilotThree alternatives
Oktopost, Sprinklr, YextOne alternative
ReviewTrackersMiniMax M2.5G2 Buyer IntentBrandwatchChangedagainst: Birdeye, Hootsuite, Podium, Sprout SocialBirdeyeReviewIncno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, SoftwareReviews, TrustRadiusTwo alternatives
Reputation, TalkwalkerFive alternatives
Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCi, YextGPT-6 LunaG2 Buyer IntentMeltwaterChangedReputationGatherUpno first choiceagainst: Adentro, DealerRater, EyeRate, GoSite, Grade.us, Mindbody, Oggvo, Rallio, Reputation, Signpost
Three alternatives
Gartner Peer Insights, TrustRadius, YextTwo alternatives
G2's vendor tools, SprinklrFour alternatives
Birdeye, SOCi, Uberall, YextTwo alternatives
Birdeye, ReviewflowzMuse Glimmer 30BBirdeye, Reputation, TrustpilotBirdeye, ReputationChangedBirdeyeReviewInc, ReviewTrackersno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Reputation, Revuze, Sprinklr, Yext
One alternative
BazaarvoiceThree alternatives
ReviewInc, SOCi, YextFive alternatives
Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCi, YextTwo alternatives
Birdeye, EmbedMyReviewsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:27 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:47 | no | 0 | 76 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:02 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 22 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:55 | no | 0 | 77 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:05 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 13 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 25 | 164 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 20 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 23 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:49 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:46 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:45 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:56 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 25 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 20 | 79 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:21 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:52 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 23 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 25 | 144 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Yelp read as Yelp for Business
Unresolved, counted raw
Bazaarvoice Ratings & Reviews
Cacao
Caliber
Chekkit
ClearlyRated
DealerRater
EyeRate
G2's vendor tools
Gartner
Glassdoor Employer Solutions
Google
Oggvo
Rallio
Repnovo
ReviewKite
ReviewPro
Reviewly AI
Signpost
SoftwareReviews
Sprinklr Unified CXM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.