Click fraud protection for small business buyers
Asked as “click fraud protection tool”, and as “invalid ad traffic blocker”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47ClickCease06Clixtell06Lunio41others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.ClickCease held the lead, −7 points on 54%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Lunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
ClickCease47%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketClickCease37%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseLunio25%Contested▼−14Since October 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ClickCease47%19%64endorsed leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 47%
ClickCease47%19%64endorsed leader▼−7Since October 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 47%02
TrafficGuard6%17%24accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
TrafficGuard6%17%24accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%03
Clixtell6%11%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
Clixtell6%11%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%04Lunio6%46%24criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Lunio6%46%24criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%05
ClickPatrol4%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
ClickPatrol4%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%06
ClickGuardian4%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
ClickGuardian4%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
Cheq4%47%17criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Cheq4%47%17criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
ClickGUARD2%15%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
ClickGUARD2%15%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%09
Fraud Blocker2%16%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Fraud Blocker2%16%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%10
Spider AF2%10%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Spider AF2%10%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ClickCease vs Fraud BlockerClickCease vs TrafficGuardClickCease vs ClickGuardianClickCease vs ClickPatrolLunio vs ClickGUARDLunio vs CheqLunio vs Fraud BlockerLunio vs TrafficGuardLunio vs ClickGuardianLunio vs ClickPatrolClickGUARD vs CheqClickGUARD vs Fraud BlockerClickGUARD vs TrafficGuardClickGUARD vs ClickGuardianClickGUARD vs ClickPatrolCheq vs Fraud BlockerCheq vs TrafficGuardCheq vs ClickGuardianCheq vs ClickPatrolFraud Blocker vs TrafficGuardFraud Blocker vs ClickGuardianFraud Blocker vs ClickPatrolTrafficGuard vs ClickGuardianTrafficGuard vs ClickPatrolClickGuardian vs ClickPatrol
One product takes 47% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lunio46%
11 of 24 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid this for small teams unless you are spending hundreds of thousands annually, as it gets expensive fast.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt
ClickCease19%
12 of 64 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools With Accuracy & False Positive Issues ClickCease - False positives: Users frequently report legitimate customers being mistakenly flagged and blocked” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Cheq47%
8 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why to avoid them: These enterprise platforms are built for cybersecurity teams and large brands spending $50,000 to $500,000+ per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ClickGUARD15%
6 of 40 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“CHEQ / ClickGuard (over-reporting & questionable value)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 834 links across 142 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice40 answers · 57 citations · 10 models
38 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ClickCease35 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Capterra35 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ClickGuardian30 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Spotsaas30 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GetApp27 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Software Advice27 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ClickPatrol25 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lunio25 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TrafficGuard25 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best click fraud protection tool”, “click fraud protection tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClickCease clickcease.com | 47% | 160 | 1,300 | 50 | 2,517 | $394,547 | 12 | 1 |
| TrafficGuard trafficguard.ai TrafficGuard 6%, TrafficGuard Shield 2% | 8% | 102 | 720 | 8 | 1,152 | 18 | 3 | |
| Clixtell clixtell.com | 6% | 46 | 90 | 0 | 276 | 15 | ||
| Lunio lunio.ai | 6% | 108 | 590 | 11 | 5,727 | $4 | 21 | |
| ClickPatrol clickpatrol.com | 4% | 61 | 20 | 0 | 2,376 | 9 | ||
| ClickGuardian clickguardian.ai | 4% | 38 | 20 | 0 | 19 | 0 | ||
| Cheq cheq.ai | 4% | 94 | 1,600 | 55 | 7,629 | $1,062 | 21 | |
| ClickGUARD clickguard.com | 2% | 103 | 320 | 5 | 8,212 | $44,456 | 7 | 6 |
| Fraud Blocker fraudblocker.com | 2% | 73 | 140 | 2 | 4,005 | 13 | 5 | |
| Spider AF spideraf.com | 2% | 49 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 14 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, clickcease.com, sourceforge.net, trafficguard.ai). The first result for “best click fraud protection tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best click fraud protection tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which invalid ad traffic blocker would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top click fraud protection tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best click fraud protection tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a click fraud protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which click fraud protection tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ClickCease, Luniono first choiceChangedClixtellClixtellno first choiceagainst: ClickPatrol, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, Lunio
Two alternatives
ClickGuardian, Fraud BlockerFive alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, LunioThree alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGuardian, Fraud BlockerGPT-5.4 miniClickCeaseLunioChangedClickCeaseagainst: Lunio, OpticksClickCeaseagainst: Cheqno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuard
One alternative
TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickPatrol, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuardGemini 3.5 FlashClickCeaseagainst: Cheq, LunioClickCeaseHeldagainst: LunioClickCeaseClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: Cheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARD, Clixtell, DataDome, Fraud Blocker, Lunio
Three alternatives
ClickGUARD, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickGUARD, Fraud BlockerFour alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
Clixtell, Didva, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardPerplexity SonarClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldagainst: CheqClickCeaseagainst: TrafficGuardTrafficGuardagainst: ClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, DataDome, HUMAN Security, Lunio
Four alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, Clixtell, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
ClickGUARD, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, LunioOne alternative
ClickGuardianGrok 4.20ClickCeaseagainst: pi-holeLunioChangedagainst: Google's built-in invalid traffic filtering, Improvado-listed toolsClickGUARDagainst: Affise, AppsFlyer, Lunio, Spider AFClixtellagainst: ClickGUARDno first choiceagainst: Click.org, ClickCease, Fraud Blocker
Three alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, Spider AFOne alternative
AdsProtegoFour alternatives
ClickCease, Clixtell, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardTwo alternatives
ClickCease, Fraud BlockerMistral SmallClickCease, Spider AFClickGuardian, ClickPatrolChangedClickCeaseClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: Cheq, ClickCease, ClickFortify, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuard
One alternative
SulvoFour alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Clixtell Click Fraud Protection, Spider AFOne alternative
Spider AFDeepSeek V4 FlashClickCeaseClickGuardianChangedClickGuardianagainst: PPC ProtectClickPatrolagainst: ClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: Cheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Three alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, ClickPatrolTwo alternatives
ClickCease, ClixtellFive alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, ImprovelyThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, Fraud BlockerLlama 4 MaverickClickCeaseno first choiceChangedno first choiceClickCeaseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Affise, AppsFlyer, ClickGUARDThree alternatives
ClickFortify, ClickPatrol, Clixtell Click Fraud ProtectionQwen 3.7 FlashFraud BlockerPageFairChangedClickCeaseClickCeaseagainst: Click Fraud FreeInvalidClicknothing named
Two alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGUARDTwo alternatives
Bing Ads, Google AdsThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Spider AFThree alternatives
ClickGuardian, ClickSambo, Google Ads Automatic Invalid-Click FilteringTwo alternatives
Spywords, VoluumKimi K2ClickCeaseCheq, ClickCeaseChangedagainst: HUMAN SecurityClickCeaseagainst: LunioClickFortify, TrafficGuardno first choiceagainst: Adjust, AppsFlyer, ClickCease / CHEQ Essentials, TrafficGuard
Three alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickGuardian, ClickSamboOne alternative
TrafficGuardFour alternatives
ClickFortify, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuardOne alternative
ClickGuardianGLM 4.7 FlashXClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldClickCeaseagainst: LunioClixtellno first choiceagainst: ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Four alternatives
ClickGUARD, Clixtell, Spider AF, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardFour alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, Spider AFThree alternatives
ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, Fraud BlockerMiniMax M2.5ClickCeaseClickCeaseHeldClickCease, ClickGUARDClickFlare, Google Ads, Meta Ads, PPC Protectno first choiceagainst: Cheq, ClickGUARD
Three alternatives
Cheq, ClickGUARD, Spider AFThree alternatives
ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuardOne alternative
Spider AFGPT-6 LunaClickCeaseTrafficGuardChangedTrafficGuard Shieldagainst: LunioTrafficGuard Shieldagainst: ClickCeaseno first choiceagainst: ClickCease
One alternative
ClickGUARDOne alternative
LunioThree alternatives
ClickCease, ClickGUARD, Fraud BlockerOne alternative
Google Ads' built-in invalid-click reportingMuse Glimmer 30BCheq, ClickCease, ClickGUARDClickCeaseChangedagainst: LunioClickCease, ClickGUARDagainst: Google's native Invalid Click ProtectionClickCease / CHEQ Essentialsno first choiceagainst: Cheq, Click Guardian, ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Three alternatives
ClickPatrol, Clixtell, Spider AFOne alternative
ClickGuardianFour alternatives
ClickPatrol, Fraud Blocker, Spider AF, TrafficGuardThree alternatives
24metrics, Clixtell, Fraud BlockerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:36 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:52 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 10 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 19 | 88 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 12 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 12 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 25 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:15 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:28 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:19 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:25 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:05 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:22 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 15 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:07 | no | 0 | 106 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 1 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 21 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 24 | 68 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 23 | 146 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HUMAN read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (formerly White Ops) read as HUMAN Security
Unresolved, counted raw
ADEX
AdsProtego
Advanté-BCS
Cheetah Fraud
Cheqbuster
Click.org
ClickFlare
Google Ads Automatic Invalid-Click Filtering
Google Ads' built-in invalid-click reporting
Google Ads' invalid click detection
Google's built-in invalid click filtering
Google's built-in invalid traffic filtering
Google's native Invalid Click Protection
Improvado-listed tools
InvalidClick
Opticks
PageFair
ProtectX Fraud Blocker
Spywords
pi-hole
uBlock Origin
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.