ClickGuardian is a SaaS click fraud protection platform that detects and blocks invalid clicks, bots, and fraudulent form submissions · clickguardian.ai ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ClickCease is first at 47%.
ClickCease is first at 37%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Lunio is first at 25%.
“Try ClickFortify ($10/mo) or ClickGuardian ($49/mo). At these prices, the tool pays for itself”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“ClickGuardian stands out as the best click fraud protection tool”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Choose ClickGuardian if you primarily use Google and Microsoft Ads and prefer flat-fee pricing”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“ClickGuardian at $49/mo for Google Ads is the lowest flat-fee cited for SMBs”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“lesser-known brands like ClickGuardian or niche local solutions that have very low review counts. Their lower ratings (e.g., 3.3/5) often reflect inconsistent performance”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“ClickGuardian has a much smaller review footprint on G2, and Trustpilot reviewers mention unusual pricing structure concerns”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as ClickGuardian, over the 38 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 21 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 13 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 13 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 3 | View → | |
| 10 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 10 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of ClickGuardian →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named ClickGuardian and are not a share of its labels.
168 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming ClickGuardian came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 72 | 23 | 2026-09-28 | Click fraud protection | |
| Comparison | 15 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2017-08-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page clickguardian.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.