PR and media monitoring for enterprise buyers
Asked as “PR and media monitoring platform”, and as “press outreach and media monitoring tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
57%
Clear leader
57Meltwater23CisionOne06Brand2413others
57% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Muck Rack vs Agility PR SolutionsMuck Rack vs MentionMuck Rack vs MeltwaterSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs AwarioSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs Brand24Semrush AI PR Toolkit vs Agility PR SolutionsSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs MentionSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs MeltwaterAwario vs Brand24Awario vs Agility PR SolutionsAwario vs MentionAwario vs MeltwaterBrand24 vs Agility PR SolutionsBrand24 vs MentionBrand24 vs MeltwaterAgility PR Solutions vs MentionAgility PR Solutions vs MeltwaterMention vs Meltwater
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Meltwater57%
Meltwater57%02CisionOne23%
CisionOne23%03Brand246%
Brand246%04Muck Rack4%
Muck Rack4%05Talkwalker2%
Talkwalker2%06Onclusive0%
Onclusive0%07Brandwatch0%
Brandwatch0%08LexisNexis Newsdesk0%
LexisNexis Newsdesk0%09Agility PR Solutions0%
Agility PR Solutions0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Meltwater20%
13 of 66 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Why avoid/caution: Strong for global/broadcast but overwhelming for teams needing clean, real-time data without heavy filtering/training.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
CisionOne20%
12 of 60 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Highest caution: The dominant legacy incumbents ... Aggressive contract lock-in ... Audited "High Risk" billing record” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Brandwatch30%
10 of 33 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“Brandwatch may not be the best choice for teams that only care about earned media coverage, as it is a social intelligence tool first and a PR platform second.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Muck Rack18%
7 of 39 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“Alternatives like Brandwatch or Muck Rack work for mid-tier but lack full enterprise depth for thousands of users.” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
24 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 318 links across 109 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
13 answers · 16 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Meltwater11 answers · 17 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Guideflow11 answers · 15 citations · 3 models
10 answers · 13 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Gartner9 answers · 9 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Shadow8 answers · 12 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Onclusive8 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Truescope8 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Muck Rack8 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
vendor site · PR.co7 answers · 13 citations · 2 models
7 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
10 answers · 3 models
9 answers · 2 models
8 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 1 model
5 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best pr and media monitoring platform”, “pr and media monitoring platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meltwater meltwater.com | 57% | 300 | 14,800 | 405 | 52,658 | $6 | 36 | 1 |
| CisionOne cision.com CisionOne 23%, Cision One 0% | 23% | 172 | 590 | 1 | 150,340 | 58 | ||
| Brand24 brand24.com | 6% | 218 | 2,900 | 61 | 28,164 | 67 | 5 | |
| Muck Rack muckrack.com | 4% | 143 | 27,100 | 520 | 1,830,983 | 71 | ||
| Determ determ.com | 4% | 6 | ||||||
| Talkwalker talkwalker.com | 2% | 72 | 4,400 | 70 | 70,874 | 21 | ||
| Truescope truescope.com | 2% | 6 | ||||||
| Onclusive onclusive.com | 0% | 42 | 590 | 4 | 14,604 | 8 | ||
| Brandwatch brandwatch.com Brandwatch 0%, Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence 0% | 0% | 119 | 6,600 | 133 | 119,214 | $585 | 120 | |
| LexisNexis Newsdesk lexisnexis.com | 0% | 6 | 90 | 3 | 951,707 | $107 | 55 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, learn.g2.com, meltwater.com, prlab.co). The first result for “best pr and media monitoring platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best PR and media monitoring platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which press outreach and media monitoring tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade PR and media monitoring platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best PR and media monitoring platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a PR and media monitoring platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which PR and media monitoring platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5MeltwaterCisionOneChangedCisionOne, MeltwaterMeltwaterno first choiceagainst: Brandwatch, Meltwater
Three alternatives
Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack, TVEyesTwo alternatives
AgilityPR Solutions, MeltwaterTwo alternatives
Brandwatch, TalkwalkerOne alternative
CisionOneGPT-5.4 miniMeltwaterCisionOneChangedCisionOne, MeltwaterMeltwaterno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CisionOne, Muck Rack, OnclusiveTwo alternatives
Meltwater, Muck RackThree alternatives
Brandwatch, Onclusive, TalkwalkerOne alternative
CisionOneGemini 3.5 FlashMuck RackMuck RackHeldno first choiceDeterm, Truescopeagainst: CisionOne, Meltwaterno first choiceagainst: Brand24, BuzzSumo, CisionOne, Emplifi, Hootsuite, Meltwater, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit, Sprout Social
Four alternatives
CisionOne, Meltwater, Onclusive, PR NewswireTwo alternatives
CisionOne, MeltwaterSix alternatives
Agility PR Solutions, CisionOne, Meltwater, Muck Rack, Notified, OnclusiveThree alternatives
Emplifi, Lumen, Muck RackPerplexity SonarMeltwaterCisionOneChangedMeltwaterMeltwaterno first choiceagainst: Brand24, BuzzSumo, CoverageBook, Mention, Muck Rack, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Two alternatives
CisionOne, OnclusiveTwo alternatives
Meltwater, Muck RackSix alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Muck Rack, Onclusive, TalkwalkerTwo alternatives
CisionOne, OnclusiveGrok 4.20MeltwaterMeltwaterHeldagainst: Brandwatch, Muck RackCisionOne, MeltwaterCisionOne, Meltwateragainst: Brand24, Brandwatch, Hootsuite, Sprout Social, TalkwalkerMeltwateragainst: Agility PR Solutions, CisionOne, Meltwater
Four alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, Muck Rack, TalkwalkerOne alternative
CisionOneSix alternatives
Brandwatch, Critical Mention / TVEyes, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Muck Rack, Onclusive, TalkwalkerThree alternatives
LexisNexis Newsdesk, Onclusive, Signal AITwo alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOneMistral SmallMeltwaterCisionOne, MeltwaterChangedMeltwater, OnclusiveCisionOneno first choiceagainst: Brandwatch, CisionOne, Critical Mention, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Meltwater, TVEyes, Talkwalker
Four alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, Muck Rack, OnclusiveSix alternatives
Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence, CisionOne, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Muck Rack, Signal AI, TVEyesTwo alternatives
Meltwater, OnclusiveDeepSeek V4 FlashMeltwaterCisionOneChangedMeltwaterBrand24against: CisionOne, Meltwater, Muck RackMeltwateragainst: Brandwatch, Business Wire, CisionOne, Meltwater, PR Newswire, Talkwalker
Four alternatives
CisionOne, Muck Rack, Onclusive, Signal AITwo alternatives
Meltwater, Muck RackSix alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Muck Rack, Onclusive, Signal AIFour alternatives
Agility PR Solutions, Critical Mention, Mention, OnclusiveFour alternatives
CisionOne, Muck Rack, Onclusive, TalkwalkerLlama 4 MaverickMeltwaterMeltwaterHeldno first choiceCisionOne, Meltwater, Talkwalkerno first choiceagainst: Brandwatch, BuzzSumo, Muck Rack
Four alternatives
Agility PR Solutions, Brandwatch, CisionOne, Muck RackQwen 3.7 FlashMeltwaterCisionOneChangedOnclusiveBrand24Meltwateragainst: BuzzSumo, CisionOne, Hootsuite, Meltwater, Muck Rack, Pressboard, Sprout Social
Two alternatives
Launchmetrics, Newsdata.io APIOne alternative
MeltwaterFive alternatives
CisionOne, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Meltwater, Signal AI, TVEyesThree alternatives
CisionOne, Meltwater, TVEyesTwo alternatives
CisionOne, OnclusiveKimi K2MeltwaterMeltwaterHeldMeltwaterDetermagainst: Brandwatch, CisionOne, MeltwaterMeltwateragainst: CisionOne, Sprinklr Insightsagainst: Brandwatch, CisionOne, Meltwater, Sprinklr Insights, Talkwalker
Four alternatives
CisionOne, Muck Rack, Onclusive, TalkwalkerTwo alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOneFive alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, Onclusive, Sprinklr Insights, TalkwalkerThree alternatives
Brand24, Mention, OnclusiveOne alternative
Muck RackGLM 4.7 FlashXMeltwaterCisionOneChangedCisionOne, MeltwaterMeltwateragainst: Muck Rackno first choiceagainst: Agorapulse, Awario, Brand24, Brandwatch, CisionOne, Crisp, Google Alerts, Hootsuite, Iconosquare, Meltwater, Mention
Three alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, TalkwalkerTwo alternatives
Meltwater, Muck RackSix alternatives
Brandwatch, LexisNexis Newsdesk, Muck Rack, Onclusive, Signal AI, TalkwalkerFour alternatives
Agility PR Solutions, Brandwatch, CisionOne, TalkwalkerMiniMax M2.5MeltwaterCisionOne, MeltwaterChangedCision One, OnclusiveBrand24against: Brandwatch, MeltwaterMeltwateragainst: Brand24against: CisionOne, Meltwater, Muck Rack, Onclusive
Three alternatives
Brandwatch, CisionOne, TalkwalkerTwo alternatives
Brand24, Muck RackThree alternatives
LexisNexis Newsdesk, Meltwater, Signal AIThree alternatives
CisionOne, Onclusive, TalkwalkerOne alternative
Sprinklr InsightsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:12 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:32 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 04:48 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:05 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:41 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:51 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:23 | yes | 0 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:55 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:23 | yes | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:34 | yes | 0 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:45 | yes | 0 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:18 | yes | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:18 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:44 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:07 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:46 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:58 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 23:15 | yes | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:14 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:15 | yes | 0 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:58 | yes | 0 | 86 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:46 | yes | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:13 | yes | 0 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:30 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:50 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:23 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:51 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:24 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 04:30 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:12 | yes | 0 | 70 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:25 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 02:06 | yes | 0 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 05:00 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:53 | yes | 0 | 42 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:18 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:24 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:38 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:22 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:50 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:18 | yes | 0 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:04 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 03:07 | yes | 0 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:27 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 02:17 | yes | 0 | 78 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:52 | yes | 0 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:24 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:48 | yes | 0 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:01 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 02:37 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 22:56 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:01 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:39 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:43 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 00:11 | yes | 0 | 85 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:53 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:23 | yes | 0 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:43 | yes | 0 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:45 | yes | 0 | 134 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 03:18 | yes | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 03:35 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 02:40 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:11 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:22 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:40 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:26 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 03:04 | yes | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:40 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:03 | no | 0 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:37 | yes | 0 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:01 | yes | 0 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:16 | yes | 0 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cision read as CisionOne
Cision (CisionOne / Brandwatch) read as CisionOne
Cision (CisionOne) read as CisionOne
Cision (including CisionOne / Brandwatch) read as CisionOne
Sprinklr read as Sprinklr Insights
Unresolved, counted raw
Newsdata.io API
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.