Mobile marketing and push for enterprise buyers
Asked as “mobile push notification and SMS marketing platform”, and as “push and SMS messaging tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
42%
Clear leader
42Braze12Airship10Courier36others
42% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Braze42%
Braze42%02Airship12%
Airship12%03Courier10%
Courier10%04OneSignal6%
OneSignal6%05Twilio Programmable Messaging4%
Twilio Programmable Messaging4%06Pushwoosh4%
Pushwoosh4%07Customer.io2%
Customer.io2%08Iterable0%
Iterable0%09Attentive0%
Attentive0%10CleverTap0%
CleverTap0%11MoEngage0%
MoEngage0%12Salesforce Marketing Cloud0%
Salesforce Marketing Cloud0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneSignal31%
12 of 39 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Why avoid: Per-channel pricing (push, email, SMS billed separately) and support reputation issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Braze16%
9 of 57 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Predictable Budgeting | Braze, Airship, MoEngage | Quote-only pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Twilio Programmable Messaging32%
8 of 25 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for This Scale: - Twilio: ... it's infrastructure-heavy—requires engineering to build journeys/UI” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Airship14%
6 of 42 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Braze, Airship, MoEngage | Quote-only pricing; no published rates” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 323 links across 150 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · Courier10 answers · 15 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Guideflow9 answers · 14 citations · 3 models
vendor site · OneSignal7 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Braze6 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
vendor site · EngageLab6 answers · 9 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Pushwoosh6 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Attentive6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Klaviyo6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · GetVero5 answers · 9 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Airship5 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · InsiderOne5 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · TextUs5 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
10 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 3 models
5 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 2 models
4 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 2 models
4 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 1 model
4 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mobile push notification and sms marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braze braze.com | 42% | 540 | 27,100 | 6,395 | 55,552 | $13,112 | 59 | |
| Airship airship.com | 12% | 169 | 22,200 | 3,093 | 23,006 | 7 | ||
| Courier courier.com | 10% | 11 | 74,000 | 39,035 | 7,809 | 5 | 1 | |
| Staffbase staffbase.com | 8% | 6 | 1,900 | 46 | 36,256 | 44 | ||
| OneSignal onesignal.com | 6% | 322 | 4,400 | 133 | 29,726 | 38 | ||
| Twilio parent site Twilio Programmable Messaging 4% | 4% | 215 | 135,000 | 4,343 | ||||
| Pushwoosh pushwoosh.com | 4% | 51 | 170 | 4 | 4,463 | 1 | ||
| Customer.io customer.io | 2% | 218 | 2,900 | 174 | 15,750 | $6,920 | 112 | |
| EngageLab engagelab.com | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| TextUs textus.com | 2% | 6 |
Google's top ten for the one searches hold 9 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (courier.com, klaviyo.com). The first result for “best mobile push notification and sms marketing platform” is courier.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best mobile push notification and SMS marketing platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which push and SMS messaging tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade mobile push and SMS marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best mobile push notification and SMS marketing platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a mobile push notification and SMS marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which mobile push and SMS marketing platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Brazeagainst: OneSignalStaffbaseChangedBrazeBraze, Pushwooshno first choiceagainst: Listrak
Three alternatives
Airship, Courier, Customer.ioEight alternatives
AlertMedia, Everbridge, Mitratech Preparis Alerts, Omnilert, OnSolve, Rave Mobile Safety, Regroup Mass Notification, Singlewire InformaCastFive alternatives
Airship, Attentive, Bloomreach, SAP Engagement Cloud, Salesforce Marketing CloudTwo alternatives
Courier, PitchPrfctTwo alternatives
Courier, IterableGPT-5.4 miniBrazeTwilio Programmable MessagingChangedBrazeagainst: OneSignalOneSignalagainst: Twilio Programmable Messagingno first choiceagainst: TeleMessage
Two alternatives
Airship, IterableOne alternative
BrazeFour alternatives
Adobe Journey Optimizer, Airship, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Twilio Segment Engage / Twilio CommunicationsOne alternative
BrazeGemini 3.5 FlashBrazeBraze, Staffbase, TextUs, WorkshopChangedagainst: Twilio Programmable MessagingBrazeBrevoagainst: Attentive, Braze, Iterableno first choiceagainst: Attentive, Bandwidth, Klaviyo, ManyChat, Oracle Responsys, Postscript, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Telnyx, Twilio Programmable Messaging, Yotpo SMSBump
Five alternatives
Courier, Customer.io, Iterable, Knock, Salesforce Marketing CloudSix alternatives
AlertMedia, Customer.io, Everbridge, OneSignal, Poppulo, SakariSeven alternatives
Adobe Journey Optimizer, Airship, Attentive, CleverTap, Iterable, MoEngage, Salesforce Marketing CloudThree alternatives
Courier, OneSignal, TrueDialogPerplexity SonarBrazeBrazeHeldBrazeagainst: Courier, OneSignal, PushwooshEngageLabno first choiceagainst: Firebase Cloud Messaging, Notix, OneSignal, PushEngage, PushOwl, Webpushr, WonderPush
Three alternatives
Courier, Infobip, OneSignalTwo alternatives
Courier, TextlineFive alternatives
Airship, Attentive, Insider, Iterable, MoEngageTwo alternatives
Courier, OneSignalGrok 4.20BrazeAirship, BrazeChangedagainst: Firebase, Omnisend, SlickText, Twilio Programmable MessagingAttentive, Brazeagainst: Klaviyo, OneSignalPushwooshagainst: Airship, Braze, IterableAirship, Brazeagainst: Attentive, Firebase Cloud Messaging, Textedly, Voyage
Five alternatives
Airship, Customer.io, Iterable, MoEngage, OneSignalOne alternative
OneSignalFive alternatives
Airship, CleverTap, Iterable, MoEngage, Twilio Programmable MessagingThree alternatives
Courier, EngageLab, OneSignalThree alternatives
Attentive, Firebase, OneSignalMistral SmallBrazeno first choiceChangedAttentive, BrazeMaestraagainst: Attentive, Brazeno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
ActiveCampaign, Customer.io, Iterable, Knock, MessageIQ, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, SalesmsgEight alternatives
Airship, CleverTap, Insider, Iterable, Klaviyo, MoEngage, Omnisend, Salesforce Marketing CloudTwo alternatives
AWS SNS, WonderPushDeepSeek V4 FlashBrazeagainst: OneSignalCourierChangedagainst: BrazeAirship, Brazeagainst: Adobe Journey Optimizer, Omnisend, Postscript, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, SenderOneSignalagainst: Airship, Braze, MoEngageBrazeagainst: OneSignalagainst: EZ Texting, Firebase Cloud Messaging, Iterable, Klaviyo, MoEngage, OneSignal, Postscript, SimpleTexting, SlickText, TextMagic, Textedly, Yotpo
Three alternatives
Airship, Courier, IterableFour alternatives
AlertMedia, Everbridge, OneSignal, Twilio Programmable MessagingEight alternatives
Attentive, CleverTap, Infobip, Iterable, Klaviyo, MoEngage, Sinch, Twilio Programmable MessagingTwo alternatives
CleverTap, CourierFour alternatives
Airship, CleverTap, Iterable, MoEngageLlama 4 MaverickCourierBrazeChangedAttentive, Brazeno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Airship, Attentive, Klaviyo SMS, Postscript
Three alternatives
GetVero, Omnisend, OneSignalFour alternatives
ActiveCampaign, Customer.io, Iterable, KnockFour alternatives
Airship, Klaviyo, OneSignal, PostscriptQwen 3.7 FlashAirship, Brazeagainst: IterableStaffbaseChangedagainst: SegmentBrazeagainst: Salesforce Marketing CloudCourieragainst: Airship, BrazeAirship, Brazeagainst: OneSignalagainst: Bulktext.io, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, OctopusSMS, Plivo, TextMagic, Twilio Programmable Messaging, Vonage
Three alternatives
Braze, Vibes, YourcoFour alternatives
Airship, Attentive, Iterable, Twilio Programmable MessagingOne alternative
EngageLabTwo alternatives
Iterable, Twilio Programmable MessagingKimi K2Airship, BrazeSimpplr, StaffbaseChangedBrazeOneSignalagainst: Airship, Braze, IterableAirship, Brazeagainst: Twilio Programmable Messagingagainst: Attentive, Braze, Klaviyo, Leanplum, OneSignal, SendGrid, SendPulse, SimpleTexting, Twilio Programmable Messaging
Four alternatives
Message IQ, OneSignal, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, SalesmsgSix alternatives
Bird, DeskAlerts, Sinch, SnapComms, Twilio Programmable Messaging, YourcoSix alternatives
Airship, Attentive, CleverTap, Iterable, OneSignal, VibesOne alternative
Twilio Programmable MessagingTwo alternatives
Courier, OneSignalGLM 4.7 FlashXBrazeTwilio Programmable MessagingChangedAttentive, BrazeCourieragainst: Airship, Amazon SNS, Braze, Customer.io, Firebase, MoEngageno first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Courier, Firebase Cloud Messaging, OneSignal, Pushwoosh, Twilio Programmable Messaging
Three alternatives
Airship, Iterable, OneSignalTwo alternatives
OneSignal, SimpleTextingSix alternatives
Airship, CleverTap, Iterable, Klaviyo, MoEngage, OneSignalThree alternatives
CleverTap, OneSignal, PushwooshMiniMax M2.5BrazeBraze, Customer.ioChangedAirship, Braze, VibesCourieragainst: CleverTap, OneSignal, Pushwooshno first choiceagainst: Klaviyo's SMS, Omnisend, Postscript, Pushwoosh, SimpleTexting, TextMagic, Yotpo SMS/Email
Three alternatives
Airship, Iterable, OneSignalTwo alternatives
HubEngage, Twilio Programmable MessagingThree alternatives
Attentive, Bloomreach, Twilio Programmable MessagingThree alternatives
Airship, Braze, Twilio Programmable MessagingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:14 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:29 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:21 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:17 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-14 23:03 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:29 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 22:57 | yes | 0 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:24 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:35 | yes | 0 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:10 | yes | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:07 | yes | 0 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 03:56 | yes | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 03:58 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:34 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:05 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:50 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:56 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 02:26 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:30 | yes | 0 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:36 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:05 | yes | 0 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:31 | yes | 0 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:36 | yes | 0 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:35 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:16 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:56 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:27 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:17 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:40 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:00 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 01:36 | yes | 0 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:57 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:24 | yes | 0 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:16 | yes | 0 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 02:02 | yes | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:35 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:00 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-14 23:15 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:40 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:12 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:35 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:11 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:02 | yes | 0 | 74 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:50 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:21 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:28 | yes | 0 | 102 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:36 | yes | 0 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 03:35 | yes | 0 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:29 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:09 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:35 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:03 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:22 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 02:23 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 03:31 | yes | 0 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:38 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:44 | yes | 0 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:17 | yes | 0 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 00:38 | yes | 0 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:22 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 03:33 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:03 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 01:50 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:17 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:21 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:56 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 00:33 | yes | 0 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:46 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:54 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:31 | yes | 0 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:28 | yes | 0 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:33 | yes | 0 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Sinch read as Sinch
Twilio read as Twilio Programmable Messaging
Twilio (Enterprise Solutions) read as Twilio Programmable Messaging
Twilio (SMS Infrastructure) read as Twilio Programmable Messaging
Twilio (Segment/Exec) read as Twilio Programmable Messaging
Twilio (SendGrid) read as Twilio Programmable Messaging
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Pinpoint
Attract
Bulktext.io
CM
DeskAlerts
Happeo
Klaviyo's SMS
MessageMedia
Mitratech Preparis Alerts
NextivaONE
NotificationHub
OctopusSMS
Omnilert
OnSolve
Rave Mobile Safety
Regroup Mass Notification
Simpplr
Singlewire InformaCast
SnapComms
Telesign
Twilio Segment Engage / Twilio Communications
Voyage (SMS-focused)
Workshop
Yotpo SMSBump
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.