Print for enterprise buyers
Asked as “direct mail automation platform”, and as “print and direct mail marketing tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · PFL 16%
37Lob16PFL12Sendoso35others
37% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Postalytics vs SendosoPostalytics vs Click2MailPostalytics vs PFLPostalytics vs MailjoyLob vs StannpLob vs PostGrid Print & MailLob vs SendosoLob vs Click2MailLob vs PFLLob vs MailjoyStannp vs PostGrid Print & MailStannp vs SendosoStannp vs Click2MailStannp vs PFLStannp vs MailjoyPostGrid Print & Mail vs SendosoPostGrid Print & Mail vs Click2MailPostGrid Print & Mail vs PFLPostGrid Print & Mail vs MailjoySendoso vs Click2MailSendoso vs PFLSendoso vs MailjoyClick2Mail vs PFLClick2Mail vs MailjoyPFL vs Mailjoy
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Lob37%
Lob37%02PFL16%
PFL16%03Sendoso12%
Sendoso12%04PostGrid Print & Mail9%
PostGrid Print & Mail9%05Postalytics9%
Postalytics9%06Reachdesk2%
Reachdesk2%07Inkit0%
Inkit0%08Postal0%
Postal0%09Click2Mail0%
Click2Mail0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Sendoso29%
14 of 49 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid: "Corporate Gifting & ABM" Platforms for High-Volume Mail * Examples: Sendoso, Postal.io, Reachdesk” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
PostGrid Print & Mail19%
8 of 42 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“PostGrid — Caution for Mid-Market Scaling ... the pricing gap and gated enterprise features create procurement friction” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Postalytics22%
9 of 41 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“Be Cautious About: Campaign-First "Self-Serve" Platforms (for Transactional Needs) * Examples: Postalytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Lob15%
8 of 53 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“platforms that large enterprises should avoid or approach with extreme caution... ### Lob Major Red Flags:” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
24 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 306 links across 105 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · Lob16 answers · 30 citations · 4 models
vendor site · PostGrid14 answers · 21 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Postalytics11 answers · 17 citations · 4 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 10 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Gartner8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · TrustRadius7 answers · 10 citations · 2 models
vendor site · CIENCE7 answers · 7 citations · 2 models
vendor site · DirectMail.io6 answers · 6 citations · 4 models
5 answers · 11 citations · 2 models
5 answers · 8 citations · 1 model
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
12 answers · 3 models
9 answers · 2 models
7 answers · 2 models
7 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 4 models
6 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best direct mail automation platform”, “direct mail automation platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lob lob.com | 37% | 302 | 27,100 | 6,319 | 55,936 | 10 | 9 | |
| PFL pfl.com | 16% | 98 | 49,500 | 3,496 | 1,448 | 8 | ||
| Sendoso sendoso.com | 12% | 285 | 8,100 | 108 | 13,840 | 10 | 7 | |
| PostGrid postgrid.com PostGrid Print & Mail 9% | 9% | 199 | 1,600 | 11 | 196,042 | $765 | 120 | 3 |
| Postalytics postalytics.com | 9% | 160 | 1,000 | 3 | 90,338 | 28 | 2 | |
| Reachdesk reachdesk.com | 2% | 223 | 2,400 | 25 | 1,290 | 9 | ||
| CM.com cm.com | 2% | 1 | ||||||
| Oppizi oppizi.com | 2% | 7 | 480 | 14 | 21,505 | |||
| PFL Tactic | 2% | |||||||
| Quadient quadient.com | 2% | 4 | 131,433 | $83 | 42 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 13 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (directmail.io, g2.com, gartner.com, lob.com, postalytics.com, postgrid.com). The first result for “best direct mail automation platform” is thecmo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best direct mail automation platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which print and direct mail marketing tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade direct mail automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best direct mail automation platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a direct mail automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which direct mail automation platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PFLSendosoChangedno first choicePostGrid Print & Mailagainst: Sendosono first choiceagainst: PostGrid Print & Mail
Three alternatives
LettrLabs, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsTwo alternatives
Optilyz, QuadientTwo alternatives
Lob, PFLGPT-5.4 miniLobLobHeldLobLobno first choiceagainst: Postal, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Two alternatives
Reachdesk, SendosoTwo alternatives
DIS Direct, mailing.comThree alternatives
PFL, Postalytics, SendosoOne alternative
PostGrid Print & MailGemini 3.5 FlashPFLPFLHeldLobLob, PFL, Postalyticsagainst: Postal, Sendosono first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, PostPilot, Postal, Postalytics, RR Donnelley / RRD, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Three alternatives
Lob, Reachdesk, SendosoThree alternatives
Lob, Reachdesk, SendosoFour alternatives
PFL, Postalytics, Postie, SendosoTwo alternatives
FastMail Direct, PostGrid Print & MailPerplexity SonarCM.comSendosoChangedLobLobno first choiceagainst: Postie
Two alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsThree alternatives
Lob, PFL, PostalyticsFive alternatives
Inkit, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, SendosoOne alternative
PostalyticsGrok 4.20LobLobHeldagainst: Postalyticsno first choiceLobagainst: Click2Mail, Reachdesk, SendosoPostGrid Print & Mailagainst: Click2Mail, Inkit, LettrLabs, Lob, Pitney Bowes, PostPilot, PostcardMania, Snackmagic, Stadium
Two alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, SendosoTwo alternatives
PFL, SendosoTwo alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsThree alternatives
DirectMail.io, Lob, PostalyticsMistral SmallLobAdobe Experience ManagerChangedPFLLobno first choiceagainst: PFL, Sendoso
Four alternatives
PFL, Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoThree alternatives
HP Exstream, PrintUI, Printable TechnologiesFive alternatives
Inkit, Lob, Postie, Reachdesk, SendosoTwo alternatives
Postal, PostalyticsDeepSeek V4 FlashLobPFL TacticChangedLobPostalyticsagainst: Click2Mail, Lob, Mailjoy, PFL, Postal, Reachdesk, Sendoso, StannpLobagainst: PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalyticsagainst: Click2Mail, Lob, PFL, Postalytics, PostcardMania, Reachdesk, Scribeless, Sendoso
Two alternatives
PFL, SendosoThree alternatives
Lob, Reachdesk, SendosoSeven alternatives
Inkit, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Quadient Inspire, Reachdesk, SendosoTwo alternatives
PFL, SendosoLlama 4 MaverickPostGrid Print & MailSincerelyChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, RRD
Three alternatives
Lob, Postalytics, SendosoThree alternatives
AmazingMail, PFL Tactic, PostGrid Print & MailQwen 3.7 FlashSendosoPostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsChangedLobQuadientagainst: Click2Mail, Lobno first choiceagainst: Braze, Click2Mail, Iterable, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Sendoso, Tremendous
Two alternatives
Inkit, LobTwo alternatives
Adobe Campaign, Salesforce Marketing CloudFour alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, SendosoTwo alternatives
Postalytics, ReachdeskKimi K2PFL, SendosoPFLChangedLob, PostGrid Print & MailLobagainst: SendosoLobagainst: PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Sendoso
Two alternatives
Lob, ReachdeskTwo alternatives
Lob, SendosoThree alternatives
PFL, Postalytics, SendosoTwo alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & MailThree alternatives
DirectMail.io, PostGrid Print & Mail, SendosoGLM 4.7 FlashXPostalyticsagainst: SendosoLobChangedPostGrid Print & MailOppiziagainst: PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalyticsno first choiceagainst: ContactPigeon, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Reachdesk, Sendoso, Stadium, Tremendous
Three alternatives
Lob, Oppizi, PostGrid Print & MailThree alternatives
Oppizi, PebblePost, SendosoFour alternatives
Inkit, Lob, Postalytics, SendosoOne alternative
LobMiniMax M2.5Reachdesk, SendosoPFLChangedLob, SendosoLobno first choiceagainst: Lob, PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Two alternatives
PFL, PostalyticsThree alternatives
Lob, Postal, SendosoFour alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, ReachdeskThree alternatives
Iterable, Postalytics, SendosoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:09 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:04 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:00 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:47 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:49 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:31 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 22:52 | yes | 0 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:46 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 02:57 | yes | 0 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:32 | yes | 0 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 02:40 | yes | 0 | 83 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:43 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:32 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:13 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:45 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:41 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:03 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:28 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 03:54 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:57 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:26 | yes | 0 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:19 | yes | 0 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 00:29 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:30 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:29 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:19 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:34 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:50 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:24 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:10 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 03:35 | yes | 0 | 64 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:21 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:17 | yes | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:29 | yes | 0 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:06 | yes | 0 | 94 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 22:52 | yes | 0 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:41 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 04:10 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:31 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:43 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:57 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-14 22:56 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:27 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:46 | yes | 0 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:57 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:14 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 04:27 | yes | 0 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:30 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:46 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:22 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:44 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 05:00 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:54 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:55 | yes | 0 | 61 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:05 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 05:05 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:25 | yes | 0 | 82 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:51 | yes | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:23 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:54 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:35 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:32 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:33 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:03 | yes | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:22 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 03:17 | yes | 0 | 88 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:09 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:12 | yes | 0 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:08 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:05 | yes | 0 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:50 | yes | 0 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
PostGrid read as PostGrid Print & Mail
Postgrid read as PostGrid Print & Mail
Unresolved, counted raw
DIS Direct
DocuSend
FastMail Direct
Franklin Madison
HP Exstream
IMPGo
Optilyz
PrintUI (by Quadient)
Printable Technologies
RR Donnelley / RRD
mailing.com
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.