Process mining for enterprise buyers
Asked as “process mining tool”, and as “process intelligence platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
68%
68Celonis Process Intelligence Platform15Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining06Apromore11others
68% of first choices, consensus.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Celonis Process Intelligence Platform held the lead, +1 point on 67%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (21%) replaces Microsoft Power Automate (25% then, 16% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (29%) replaces Apromore (19% then, 27% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%Consensus▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%Consensus▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%16%75endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.67% → 68%
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%16%75endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.67% → 68%02Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining15%10%40accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 20% → 15%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 15%
03
Apromore6%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
Apromore6%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%04IBM Process Mining4%12%41accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
05
Microsoft Power Automate4%8%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Microsoft Power Automate4%8%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
UiPath Process Mining2%20%60accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
UiPath Process Mining2%20%60accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
ABBYY Timeline0%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ABBYY Timeline0%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%17%65accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
10
Appian0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Appian0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08ARIS Process Mining0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ApromoreMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineApromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs PM4PyApromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromore vs ABBYY TimelineUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyUiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4PyCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs ABBYY TimelinePM4Py vs Microsoft Power AutomatePM4Py vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligencePM4Py vs ABBYY TimelineMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs ABBYY TimelineSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs ABBYY Timeline
One product takes 68% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Thirteen of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform16%
12 of 75 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid making Celonis the first choice for this constraint: it is often regarded as the strongest enterprise platform, but pricing is custom” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
UiPath Process Mining20%
12 of 60 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“What I would avoid for your use case: tools that price heavily by named users... UiPath's current process mining licensing is consumption-based” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
17%
11 of 65 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid for Predictable Budgeting ... Complex, no public rate card” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
IBM Process Mining
12%
5 of 41 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Enterprise should avoid this if they don't have significant IBM infrastructure already in place.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 950 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 43 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G240 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Signavio25 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · IBM23 answers · 30 citations · 13 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · KYP.ai17 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Celonis16 answers · 38 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Apromore16 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best process mining tool”, “process mining tool”, “process mining tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celonis Process Intelligence Platform celonis.com | 68% | 184 | 170 | 0 | 18,510 | 120 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining 15%, Microsoft Power Automate 4% | 19% | 323 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Apromore apromore.com | 6% | 122 | 590 | 9 | 227 | |||
| IBM parent site IBM Process Mining 4% | 4% | 82 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| UiPath Process Mining uipath.com UiPath Process Mining 2%, UiPath Agentic Automation 0% | 2% | 148 | 140 | 3 | 161,995 | $74 | 107 | 6 |
| SAP parent site SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 0%, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite 0% | 0% | 153 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| ARIS Process Mining aris.com | 0% | 27 | 12,604 | 0 | ||||
| ABBYY Timeline abbyy.com | 0% | 39 | 30 | 0 | 36,786 | 14 | ||
| Software AG softwareag.com | 0% | 24 | 720 | 133 | 19,753 | 0 | ||
| Appian appian.com | 0% | 61 | 18,100 | 1,363 | 46,589 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (ibm.com, trycaddi.com). The first result for “best process mining tool” is decisions.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best process mining tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which process intelligence platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade process mining tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best process mining tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a process mining tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which process mining tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence Platform, UiPath Process MiningChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, Skan AI
Five alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, SignavioFour alternatives
IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
IBM Process MiningGPT-5.4 miniCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: ServiceNow Process MiningCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: UiPath Process Miningno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceFour alternatives
IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
IBM Process MiningGemini 3.5 FlashCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Fluxicon Disco, PM4Py, ProM
Three alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Apromore, IBM Process Mining, MindziePerplexity SonarCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformno first choiceagainst: Apromore, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie, QPR, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Six alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningSeven alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, ServiceNow Process Mining, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Apromore, IBM Process MiningGrok 4.20Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreagainst: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process MiningCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: ABBYY Timeline, Appian Process HQ, Apromore Community Edition, BusinessOptix, Fluxicon Disco, MEHRWERK, Minit, ProM, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, myInvenio
Three alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformFour alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningMistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: ABBYY Timeline, ARIS Process Mining, Appian Process HQ, UiPath Process Mining
Three alternatives
Apromore, IBM Process Mining, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceFour alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningDeepSeek V4 FlashCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformIBM Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, PM4Py, ProM
Two alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFive alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining, iGrafxFive alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Appian Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceThree alternatives
QPR, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningLlama 4 MaverickCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformIBM Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Three alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceFour alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Agentic AutomationQwen 3.7 FlashCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Four alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Pega Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningKimi K2Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: ABBYY Timeline, Appian Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Software AG (ARIS) Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Three alternatives
Microsoft, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, ServiceNow Process Mining, UiPath Process MiningSeven alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, QPR, Signavio, UiPath Process MiningGLM 4.7 FlashXCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: AppianCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: PM4Py, ProM Framework
Two alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
Appian, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
IBM Process Mining, ProcessMindMiniMax M2.5Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platformnothing named
Three alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningSeven alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG's ARIS, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Apromore, QPR ProcessAnalyzerThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningGPT-6 LunaCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningno first choiceagainst: Fluxicon Disco, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, ProM, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Three alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceSix alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMuse Glimmer 30BCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformHeldCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: ABBYY Timeline, Appian Process HQ, Apromore Community Edition, Fluxicon Disco, Proxverse, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Two alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceSeven alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining, mpmXTwo alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process MiningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 15 | 63 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:14 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:34 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:52 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 20 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:45 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:28 | yes | 19 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 13 | 79 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:33 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:21 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 25 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 21 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 3 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:06 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:32 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:42 | yes | 20 | 64 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 24 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:46 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:46 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:38 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 24 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ABBYY read as ABBYY Timeline
ARIS read as ARIS Process Mining
ARIS (Software GmbH) read as ARIS Process Mining
ARIS (by Software AG) read as ARIS Process Mining
Celonis read as Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
IBM read as IBM Process Mining
Microsoft Process Advisor read as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Microsoft Process Mining read as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
SAP Signavio read as SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Process Mining
Skan read as Skan AI
UiPath read as UiPath Process Mining
UiPath Process Intelligence read as UiPath Process Mining
UiPath Process Mining / Process Intelligence read as UiPath Process Mining
Unresolved, counted raw
ActiveOps WorkiQ
Appway
Everest
Pega Process Mining
QAD
Software AG (ARIS) Process Intelligence
Software AG's ARIS
UpFlux
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.