Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs ABBYY Timeline
Process mining · November 2026 Edition
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs ABBYY Timeline
Zero of fourteen models named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first on the direct prompt; one named ABBYY Timeline. Celonis Process Intelligence Platform was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ABBYY Timeline by nine and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform carries 65 labels and ABBYY Timeline 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate51%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6516A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ABBYY Timeline · Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformFirst choices, of fourteen modelsABBYY Timeline
Direct0112 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Paraphrase204 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Comparative130
Budget-constrained005 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Scale-constrained103 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Negative109 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · 2 against ABBYY Timeline
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and ABBYY Timeline were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 202 answers naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and the 44 naming ABBYY Timeline. In those answers ABBYY Timeline took the first choice one time and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform twenty-six.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and ABBYY Timeline stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform ABBYY Timeline first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform on the left and ABBYY Timeline on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and ABBYY Timeline stood in it.
ABBYY Timeline first, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform not the choice
1 of 14 modelsCelonis Process Intelligence Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform0%#13 of 13ABBYY Timeline0%#– of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by four points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%#4 of 11ABBYY Timeline2%#8 of 11Enterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by sixty-eight points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%#1 of 10ABBYY Timeline0%#9 of 10What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid first if budget is tight - Celonis is a leader in the market, but its pricing is not transparent” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid for typical mid-market budgets... Celonis enterprise deals average around $418,000 a year” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · hard negative
“Celonis — The Enterprise Standard ... Most mature analytics, "Process Copilot" AI assistant, real-time digital twin of operations, largest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader with best pre-built extractors. Can be pricey, but offers scalable cloud entry. Best for "heavy" ERP environments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Celonis is rated as the best overall process mining platform for cross-system process intelligence at enterprise scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about ABBYY Timeline
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“cautionary remarks about Timeline's ability to intuitively gather insights, as well as the number of steps required to do so” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“noted to be "behind the innovation curve," especially lacking GenAI capabilities” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Agile & User-Friendly Mid-Market Vendors: ABBYY Timeline... Faster time-to-value, lower cost, simpler licensing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose ABBYY/Appian if you need predictive intelligence or low-code integration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineApromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs ABBYY TimelineUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4PyCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligencePM4Py vs ABBYY TimelineMicrosoft Power Automate vs ABBYY TimelineSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs ABBYY TimelineAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.