Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power Automate
Process mining · November 2026 Edition

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power Automate

Zero of fourteen models named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first on the direct prompt; one named Microsoft Power Automate. Celonis Process Intelligence Platform was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate by seven and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform carries 65 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Microsoft Power Automate

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate51%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate · Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Power Automate
Direct0112 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Paraphrase204 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Comparative130
Budget-constrained015 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · 1 against Microsoft Power Automate
Scale-constrained103 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Negative109 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · 1 against Microsoft Power Automate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform Microsoft Power Automate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform on the left and Microsoft Power Automate on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate first, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform not the choice

1 of 14 modelsCelonis Process Intelligence Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate leads by sixteen points.
Microsoft Power Automate16%#3 of 13
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform0%#13 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads at mid-market.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%#4 of 11
Microsoft Power Automate4%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by sixty-four points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%#1 of 10
Microsoft Power Automate4%#5 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid first if budget is tight - Celonis is a leader in the market, but its pricing is not transparent” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid for typical mid-market budgets... Celonis enterprise deals average around $418,000 a year” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · hard negative
“Celonis — The Enterprise Standard ... Most mature analytics, "Process Copilot" AI assistant, real-time digital twin of operations, largest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader with best pre-built extractors. Can be pricey, but offers scalable cloud entry. Best for "heavy" ERP environments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Celonis is rated as the best overall process mining platform for cross-system process intelligence at enterprise scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.