Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Process mining · November 2026 Edition
Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Six of fourteen models named Apromore first on the direct prompt; zero named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. Both were named by all fourteen models and Apromore carries 46 labels and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform 65, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share27%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%51%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4665A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Apromore reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Apromore · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · Apromore vs UiPath Process Mining
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ApromoreFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCelonis Process Intelligence Platform
Direct6012 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Paraphrase224 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Comparative0131 against Apromore
Budget-constrained605 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Scale-constrained011 against Apromore · 3 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Negative012 against Apromore · 9 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Apromore and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform were named in the same answer 113 times, of the 128 answers naming Apromore and the 202 naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. In those answers Celonis Process Intelligence Platform took the first choice thirty-four times and Apromore twenty-eight.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Apromore and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Apromore Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apromore on the left and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Apromore and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform stood in it.
Apromore first, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform an alternative
6 of 14 modelsCelonis Process Intelligence Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Apromore leads by eighteen points.
Apromore18%#2 of 13Celonis Process Intelligence Platform0%#13 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Apromore leads by twenty-one points.
Apromore27%#2 of 11Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%#4 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads at enterprise.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%#1 of 10Apromore6%#3 of 10What the models said about Apromore
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“notably high negative rate (27%) and is labeled as a "criticized challenger"” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I didn't pull a fresh official source here, so I'd want to verify current product positioning before making a strong recommendation.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“it may require additional technical expertise to manage effectively, and limitations in support and ease of use” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best process mining tools for a mid-market B2B company are generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“The best process mining tool for a company with a limited budget is Apromore, as it is an open-source tool that offers a free Community Edition” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Apromore stands out as the top open-source option with a free Community Edition, making it ideal for starting on a small budget” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid first if budget is tight - Celonis is a leader in the market, but its pricing is not transparent” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid for typical mid-market budgets... Celonis enterprise deals average around $418,000 a year” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · hard negative
“Celonis — The Enterprise Standard ... Most mature analytics, "Process Copilot" AI assistant, real-time digital twin of operations, largest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader with best pre-built extractors. Can be pricey, but offers scalable cloud entry. Best for "heavy" ERP environments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Celonis is rated as the best overall process mining platform for cross-system process intelligence at enterprise scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ApromoreMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs PM4PyApromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromore vs ABBYY TimelineUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4PyCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs ABBYY TimelineAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.