Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is a process mining product from Celonis · celonis.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining at 15%.
“Celonis — The Enterprise Standard ... Most mature analytics, "Process Copilot" AI assistant, real-time digital twin of operations, largest ecosystem”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“Market leader with best pre-built extractors. Can be pricey, but offers scalable cloud entry. Best for "heavy" ERP environments.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Celonis is rated as the best overall process mining platform for cross-system process intelligence at enterprise scale”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Market leader with a comprehensive process mining and execution management platform, known for advanced AI capabilities”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
“Avoid first if budget is tight - Celonis is a leader in the market, but its pricing is not transparent”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to avoid for typical mid-market budgets... Celonis enterprise deals average around $418,000 a year”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · warning
“What to Avoid for Mid-Sized Companies - Celonis — ... Pricing and complexity are typically overkill”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, over the 202 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 155 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 113 | 37 | Compare → | |
| 113 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 82 | 2 | View → | |
| 41 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 24 | 7 | View → | |
| 24 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of Celonis Process Intelligence Platform →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Celonis Process Intelligence Platform's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 184 of the 202 answers that named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and are not a share of its labels.
501 of the 537 domain citations in answers naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform came from a third party's page. Thirty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 736 | undated | Process mining, PAM | ||
| Blog | 636 | undated | Process mining, RPA | ||
| News or press | 390 | undated | Process mining, ITSM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 156 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Report or ebook | 103 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Conference or event | 72 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Comparison | 48 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Podcast or video | 33 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Case study | 30 | undated | Process mining, ITSM | ||
| Template or tool | 13 | 10 | 2026-08-31 |
As the event pages on celonis.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page celonis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.