Process mining · RankedUiPath Process Mining
UiPath Process Mining is a process mining product from UiPath · uipath.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
Why models recommend it
“Microsoft Power Automate (Process Mining) and UiPath generally offer the strongest balance of capability, price, and ease of implementation”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Best Overall for Most Mid-Market Companies: UiPath Process Mining”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining ⭐ Best Overall for Mid-Market”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
What gives them pause
“mid-to-high cost and overkill for limited budgets”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“shallower analytics depth than pure process mining leaders; challenges with large datasets, data integration ... Pricing and complexity can overwhelm.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“UiPath can connect mining to RPA, but rule-based automation may become brittle when processes change frequently”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“It lacks object-centric process mining capabilities, and platform depth is optimized for RPA use cases”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as UiPath Process Mining, over the 164 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 155 | 59 | Compare → | |
| 124 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 95 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 89 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 69 | 1 | View → | |
| 37 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 15 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of UiPath Process Mining →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on UiPath Process Mining's own site, not checked by Gane.
- Free plan or trial
- Try UiPath free
- Customers named
- One NZ, WEX, Suncoast Credit Union, Continental Resources, Medlitix, PromptCare, Cato Networks, Buchanan
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 148 of the 164 answers that named UiPath Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
413 of the 446 domain citations in answers naming UiPath Process Mining came from a third party's page. Thirty-three were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 2,672 | 12 | 2026-11-12 | ITSM, Vector databases | |
| News or press | 1,023 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 513 | 14 | 2026-10-20 | ITSM | |
| Blog | 458 | 8 | 2026-09-16 | ITSM | |
| Case study | 355 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 272 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2018-12-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-15 |
Events in person
- December 10, 2025UiPath FUSION Tokyo 2025東京ミッドタウン六本木, Tokyo, Japan · hosted
As the event pages on uipath.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page uipath.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.