PM4Py
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
Why models recommend it
“It is the industry standard for open-source process mining... Complete flexibility, free, and easy to automate in data pipelines.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“PM4Py (Free/Open Source) - Best Overall Choice”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“PM4Py is a no-license-cost open-source option—but it’s a developer library, not a ready-made business-user app.”GPT-6 Luna · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“PM4Py is Python library, good if your team already works in Python / Jupyter”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“it lacks a user-friendly GUI and requires technical expertise—best for very limited budgets with data-savvy teams”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Open-source options like ProM or PM4Py exist but are more for research/academia than enterprise use.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as PM4Py, over the 28 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 15 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 6 | 4 | View → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of PM4Py →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named PM4Py and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for PM4Py, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |