process.science is a process mining tool for analyzing and understanding business processes · process-science.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“I recommend starting with UiPath Process Mining or Process.Science”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“Excellent if you already use Power BI or Qlik for analytics. Affordable (starting near free for basics), AI-focused”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · alternative
“Often praised for starting at €0 (free tier or low entry)... solid plug-and-play option for basic needs”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“mindzie / Workfellow / Process.Science are commonly recommended for mid-market evaluation.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as process.science, over the 22 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 2 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 7 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 1 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on process.science's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named process.science and are not a share of its labels.
102 of the 102 domain citations in answers naming process.science came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Blog | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-17 | Process mining | |
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2023-12-12 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2021-05-21 |
Every page process-science.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.