Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is a process mining product from Microsoft, offered under the Power Automate name · microsoft.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first, contested: Apromore has 18%.
Ranked first, contested: Apromore has 27%. 5 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“Best budget-friendly default: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining—if your company already uses Microsoft’s Power Platform.”GPT-6 Luna · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (part of the Power Platform) is often the best fit for a mid-market B2B company.”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and Apromore are widely considered the most cost-effective solutions.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Frequently called "terrible" in user forums for poor UX ... Alternatives if avoiding: Look at more robust options like Celonis or Apromore”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“the most frequently criticized process mining tool in user communities”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“check capacity and licensing carefully if you expect large analyses or many users”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“you may encounter limitations in capture depth and analytics sophistication”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, over the 124 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | 40 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 89 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 79 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 51 | 0 | View → | |
| 26 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 21 | 6 | View → | |
| 21 | 1 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 113 of the 124 answers that named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.
311 of the 335 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining came from a third party's page. Twenty-four were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |