ProM
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
Why models recommend it
“Best for analysts with coding skills: PM4Py or ProM Lite – zero cost, maximum flexibility, higher learning curve.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“ProM (Best for Technical Teams)... it requires technical expertise for setup and maintenance”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“ProM and Apromore are strong open‑source options, with ProM leaning toward research”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
“Strong data/IT team, comfortable with code → PM4Py, ProM, or custom stack.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“avoid deploying it for production enterprise use”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Avoid: ProM if you lack a data science team.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“ProM (the main open-source option) has limitations for enterprise use: Steep technical learning curve”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“allow complete analysis without deep theoretical knowledge, although with limitations in customization”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ProM, over the 27 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 5 | View → | |
| 17 | 3 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 13 | 2 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 3 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of ProM →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named ProM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for ProM, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |