ABBYY Timeline is a process mining and process intelligence product from ABBYY · abbyy.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Agile & User-Friendly Mid-Market Vendors: ABBYY Timeline... Faster time-to-value, lower cost, simpler licensing”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scale-constrained question · alternative
“Choose ABBYY/Appian if you need predictive intelligence or low-code integration”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for Desktop Heavy & Disconnected Systems: KYP.ai or ABBYY Timeline”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · alternative
“cautionary remarks about Timeline's ability to intuitively gather insights, as well as the number of steps required to do so”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“noted to be "behind the innovation curve," especially lacking GenAI capabilities”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as ABBYY Timeline, over the 44 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 26 | Compare → | |
| 37 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of ABBYY Timeline →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on ABBYY Timeline's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 39 of the 44 answers that named ABBYY Timeline and are not a share of its labels.
139 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming ABBYY Timeline came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 495 | undated | RPA, Process mining | ||
| News or press | 311 | undated | RPA, Document processing | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 111 | undated | Process mining, RPA | ||
| Report or ebook | 86 | undated | Document processing, Process mining | ||
| Case study | 82 | undated | Document processing, RPA | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 61 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Conference or event | 35 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 17 | undated | Process mining, RPA | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 5 | undated | Document processing |
As the event pages on abbyy.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page abbyy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name document processing (34); 24 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.