SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is a process mining product from SAP · sap.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“I'd usually recommend SAP Signavio first if you want the best balance of capability and usability”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Best for SAP Environments ... Save Celonis or SAP Signavio for when: Your organization becomes larger/more complex”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · alternative
“prioritize more widely endorsed platforms like Celonis, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, or SAP Signavio”Mistral Small · Negative question · alternative
“Deep SAP integration and strong process-transformation governance; less compelling if SAP is not central.”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · alternative
“SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Avoid traditional enterprise leaders like Celonis or SAP Signavio if budget is tight”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to Avoid ... SAP Signavio: Only makes sense if you're heavily invested in SAP ERP”Kimi K2 · Direct question · warning
“Pricing ranges $150K–$700K/year; only makes sense for large SAP-centric enterprises.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, over the 161 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | 62 | Compare → | |
| 124 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 30 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 68 | 1 | View → | |
| 35 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 4 | View → | |
| 21 | 6 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on SAP Signavio Process Intelligence's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 153 of the 161 answers that named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
440 of the 471 domain citations in answers naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence came from a third party's page. Thirty-one were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |