Process mining · RankedApromore
Apromore is a process mining product with an open-source option · apromore.com ↗
Strongest at mid-market. Ranked 3 of 53 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
Why models recommend it
“the best process mining tools for a mid-market B2B company are generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“The best process mining tool for a company with a limited budget is Apromore, as it is an open-source tool that offers a free Community Edition”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Apromore stands out as the top open-source option with a free Community Edition, making it ideal for starting on a small budget”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Cited as the top mid-market first-choice in the AI Recommendation Index and as "Budget / research" in vendor comparisons.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“notably high negative rate (27%) and is labeled as a "criticized challenger"”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“I didn't pull a fresh official source here, so I'd want to verify current product positioning before making a strong recommendation.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · warning
“it may require additional technical expertise to manage effectively, and limitations in support and ease of use”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
“Good if you want flexibility and lower costs, but may require more technical setup or customization.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Apromore, over the 128 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | 34 | Compare → | |
| 95 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 79 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 3 | View → | |
| 22 | 4 | View → | |
| 17 | 3 | View → |
What the models named instead of Apromore →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Apromore's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- business users
- Price stated
- Our flexible pricing enables a value-driven pathway and lower Total Cost of Ownership for process intellgeince adoption.
- Free plan or trial
- free 30-day trial
- Customers named
- Assurant, Inail, Komatsu, Leonardo, Next Era Energy, Oshkosh, Origin, University of Melbourne
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 122 of the 128 answers that named Apromore and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
389 of the 420 domain citations in answers naming Apromore came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 130 | undated | Process mining, RPA | ||
| Blog | 87 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | Process mining, RPA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 21 | 0 | 2024-07-23 | Process mining | |
| Case study | 20 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-27 | Process mining | |
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2025-03-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-04-07From hype to operational reality key takeaways from icpm 2026 blog
- 2026-03-27What is process mining glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-26Apromore process mining for salesforce blog
- 2025-10-27The future has arrived unlock agentic ai with process intelligence blog
- 2025-09-22From static models to conversational intelligence using apromore copilot across the process improvement lifecycle blog
- 2025-08-1320 rule of enterprise ai blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page apromore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.