Process mining · November 2026 Edition
Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate
Six of fourteen models named Apromore first on the direct prompt; one named Microsoft Power Automate. Apromore was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate by seven and Apromore carries 46 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share27%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Apromore reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Apromore · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate · Apromore vs UiPath Process Mining
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ApromoreFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Power Automate
Direct61
Paraphrase20
Comparative001 against Apromore
Budget-constrained611 against Microsoft Power Automate
Scale-constrained001 against Apromore
Negative002 against Apromore · 1 against Microsoft Power Automate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Apromore and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Apromore Microsoft Power Automate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apromore on the left and Microsoft Power Automate on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Apromore and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
Apromore first, Microsoft Power Automate not the choice
6 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Power Automate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Microsoft Power Automate first, Apromore an alternative
1 of 14 modelsApromore was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Apromore leads by two points.
Apromore18%#2 of 13Microsoft Power Automate16%#3 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Apromore leads by twenty-three points.
Apromore27%#2 of 11Microsoft Power Automate4%#6 of 11Enterprise
Apromore leads by two points.
Apromore6%#3 of 10Microsoft Power Automate4%#5 of 10What the models said about Apromore
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“notably high negative rate (27%) and is labeled as a "criticized challenger"” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I didn't pull a fresh official source here, so I'd want to verify current product positioning before making a strong recommendation.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“it may require additional technical expertise to manage effectively, and limitations in support and ease of use” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best process mining tools for a mid-market B2B company are generally considered to be Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, and ABBYY Timeline” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“The best process mining tool for a company with a limited budget is Apromore, as it is an open-source tool that offers a free Community Edition” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Apromore stands out as the top open-source option with a free Community Edition, making it ideal for starting on a small budget” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ApromoreMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs PM4PyApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromore vs ABBYY TimelineUiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power AutomatePM4Py vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs ABBYY TimelineAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.