IBM Process Mining is process mining software from IBM that analyzes how business processes run in order to find bottlenecks and opportunities for automation · ibm.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“Add IBM, Apromore, or QPR when deployment control, simulation, openness, or compliance is a decisive requirement”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Best For: Enterprises seeking deep simulation capabilities and AI-driven workflow automation.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for: B2B companies requiring strong compliance and governance”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · alternative
“Best if IBM is already your core stack: IBM Process Mining”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
“What to Avoid ... IBM Process Mining — Better suited for large regulated industries”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Security vulnerability history. IBM has published multiple Security Bulletins for Process Mining with actively addressed CVEs”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Celonis and IBM may bring unnecessary cost, complexity, or license minimums if you have a small user base”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Reviewers report a steep learning curve; business users struggle without specialist support.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as IBM Process Mining, over the 87 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 34 | View → | |
| 69 | 4 | View → | |
| 68 | 0 | View → | |
| 51 | 13 | View → | |
| 47 | 8 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 14 | 3 | View → | |
| 10 | 1 | View → | |
| 9 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of IBM Process Mining →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on IBM Process Mining's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 82 of the 87 answers that named IBM Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.
222 of the 259 domain citations in answers naming IBM Process Mining came from a third party's page. Eighteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |