Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Process mining · November 2026 Edition

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Five of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Both were named by all fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 47 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share29%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4749A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Apromore · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Direct505 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Paraphrase613 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Comparative00
Budget-constrained403 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Scale-constrained00
Negative004 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 5 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence were named in the same answer ninety-four times, of the 124 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and the 161 naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. In those answers SAP Signavio Process Intelligence took the first choice zero times and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining thirty.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
ModelDirectMPSSParaphraseMPSSComparativeMPSSBudget-constrainedMPSSScale-constrainedMPSSNegativeMPSS
Claude Haiku 4.5MPMPSSMP
GPT-5.4 miniSSSSMPSS
Gemini 3.5 FlashMPMPMPMPSSMPSSSS
Perplexity SonarSSMPSSMPSSMPSS
Grok 4.20MPSSMPSSMPSSSSMPSS
Mistral SmallMPSSSSMPMPSS
DeepSeek V4 FlashSSSSMPSSMPSSMPSS
Llama 4 MaverickMPMPSS
Qwen 3.7 FlashMPSSSSMPSSMP
Kimi K2MPSSMPSSMPSSMP
GLM 4.7 FlashXSSSSMPSSMPMP
MiniMax M2.5MPSSMPMPSS
GPT-6 LunaSSMPSSMPSSMPMPSS
Muse Glimmer 30BMPSSMPSSSS
MP Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningSS SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence not the choice

5 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by twenty-one points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining21%#1 of 13
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by twenty-seven points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining29%#1 of 11
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by fifteen points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining15%#2 of 10
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#7 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Frequently called "terrible" in user forums for poor UX ... Alternatives if avoiding: Look at more robust options like Celonis or Apromore” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“the most frequently criticized process mining tool in user communities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“check capacity and licensing carefully if you expect large analyses or many users” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best budget-friendly default: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining—if your company already uses Microsoft’s Power Platform.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (part of the Power Platform) is often the best fit for a mid-market B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and Apromore are widely considered the most cost-effective solutions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional enterprise leaders like Celonis or SAP Signavio if budget is tight” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... SAP Signavio: Only makes sense if you're heavily invested in SAP ERP” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“I'd usually recommend SAP Signavio first if you want the best balance of capability and usability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for SAP Environments ... Save Celonis or SAP Signavio for when: Your organization becomes larger/more complex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
“prioritize more widely endorsed platforms like Celonis, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, or SAP Signavio” Mistral Small · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.