Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › PM4Py vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Process mining · November 2026 Edition
PM4Py vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Zero of fourteen models named PM4Py first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. PM4Py was named by nine of the fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence by fourteen and PM4Py carries 12 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.
PM4Py
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1249A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PM4Py reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4Py · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · Apromore vs PM4Py
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PM4PyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Direct005 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Paraphrase013 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Comparative001 against PM4Py
Budget-constrained201 against PM4Py · 3 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PM4Py and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
| Model | DirectPMSS | ParaphrasePMSS | ComparativePMSS | Budget-constrainedPMSS | Scale-constrainedPMSS | NegativePMSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | SS | PM | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SS | SS | SS | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | PMSS | SS | SS | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | SS | SS | SS | PM | SS | |
| Grok 4.20 | SS | SS | PMSS | PMSS | SS | |
| Mistral Small | SS | SS | SS | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | SS | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SS | SS | SS | |||
| Kimi K2 | SS | SS | SS | PM | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SS | SS | SS | PM | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | SS | PMSS | PM | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | SS | SS | SS | PM | SS | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SS | SS | SS | PM |
PM PM4PySS SAP Signavio Process IntelligencePM first choicePM named as an alternativePM argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PM4Py on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.
The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PM4Py and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
PM4Py0%#10 of 13
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 13
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
PM4Py leads by two points.
PM4Py4%#5 of 11
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
PM4Py0%#– of 10
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#7 of 10
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about PM4Py
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“it lacks a user-friendly GUI and requires technical expertise—best for very limited budgets with data-savvy teams” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Open-source options like ProM or PM4Py exist but are more for research/academia than enterprise use.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“It is the industry standard for open-source process mining... Complete flexibility, free, and easy to automate in data pipelines.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“PM4Py (Free/Open Source) - Best Overall Choice” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“PM4Py is a no-license-cost open-source option—but it’s a developer library, not a ready-made business-user app.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional enterprise leaders like Celonis or SAP Signavio if budget is tight” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... SAP Signavio: Only makes sense if you're heavily invested in SAP ERP” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“I'd usually recommend SAP Signavio first if you want the best balance of capability and usability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for SAP Environments ... Save Celonis or SAP Signavio for when: Your organization becomes larger/more complex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
“prioritize more widely endorsed platforms like Celonis, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, or SAP Signavio” Mistral Small · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromore vs PM4PyApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4PyCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligencePM4Py vs Microsoft Power AutomatePM4Py vs ABBYY TimelineMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs ABBYY TimelineAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.