Enterprise architecture tools for enterprise buyers
Asked as “enterprise architecture tool”, and as “application portfolio management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
50%
Clear leader
50SAP LeanIX23Ardoq08LeanIX19others
50% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 45% → 50%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.SAP LeanIX held the lead, +5 points on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessArchi31%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 20% → 31%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSAP LeanIX23%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 26% → 23%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSAP LeanIX50%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 45% → 50%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SAP LeanIX50%5%63endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 45% → 50%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 50%
02
Ardoq23%2%62accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 21% → 23%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 23%
Ardoq23%2%62accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 21% → 23%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 23%03
LeanIX8%24%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%
LeanIX8%24%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%04
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%30%20criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%30%20criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%05
Bizzdesign Horizzon2%18%49accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Bizzdesign Horizzon2%18%49accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%06
Orbus Software2%0%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Orbus Software2%0%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07OrbusInfinity2%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08
Sparx Enterprise Architect2%56%18criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Sparx Enterprise Architect2%56%18criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
MEGA HOPEX0%50%26criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
MEGA HOPEX0%50%26criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%10
ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture0%27%30criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture0%27%30criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Planview Portfolios0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Planview Portfolios0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Avolution ABACUS0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Avolution ABACUS0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
S01
0203040506O07
0809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01SAP LeanIX50%
02Ardoq23%
Ardoq23%03LeanIX8%
LeanIX8%04Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%05Bizzdesign Horizzon2%
Bizzdesign Horizzon2%06Orbus Software2%
Orbus Software2%07OrbusInfinity2%
08Sparx Enterprise Architect2%
Sparx Enterprise Architect2%09Avolution ABACUS0%
Avolution ABACUS0%10ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture0%
ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture0%11Planview Portfolios0%
Planview Portfolios0%12MEGA HOPEX0%
MEGA HOPEX0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Visio
89%
8 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Tools with weak or no workflow/governance features (many “modeling only” tools such as early versions of Visio‑based stacks ... No audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Sparx Enterprise Architect56%
10 of 18 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Has the highest negative rate (56%) among enterprise buyers... Best suited for small to mid-sized organizations rather than large enterprises” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Bizzdesign Horizzon18%
9 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Predictable Costs | BiZZdesign Horizzon | Custom quotes | Unpredictable, sales-led pricing” Kimi K2, budget prompt
MEGA HOPEX50%
13 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Legacy “Ivory Tower” EA suites (examples include older versions of MEGA HOPEX... High technical aptitude required, poor adoption” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 956 links across 216 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G242 answers · 70 citations · 11 models
vendor site · LeanIX29 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ardoq28 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capstera17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Superblocks15 answers · 15 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 5 models
13 answers · 4 models
13 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best enterprise architecture tool”, “enterprise architecture tool”, “enterprise architecture tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP parent site SAP LeanIX 50% | 50% | 142 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Ardoq ardoq.com | 23% | 146 | 1,300 | 21 | 10,546 | 56 | ||
| LeanIX leanix.net | 8% | 50 | 2,900 | 64 | 49,984 | 105 | 6 | |
| Sparx Enterprise Architect sparxsystems.com Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect 5%, Sparx Enterprise Architect 2% | 6% | 70 | 260 | 15 | 24,501 | 17 | 2 | |
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow APM 2%, ServiceNow Application Portfolio Management 2%, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management 2%, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture 0% | 5% | 70 | 135,000 | 13,451 | ||||
| Essential Cloud | 3% | 20 | 154 | |||||
| Bizzdesign Horizzon bizzdesign.com | 2% | 106 | 40 | 0 | 10,052 | $38 | 23 | |
| Orbus Software orbussoftware.com | 2% | 35 | 390 | 12 | 2,930 | 6 | 3 | |
| OrbusInfinity | 2% | 90 | 3 | |||||
| Avolution ABACUS avolutionsoftware.com | 0% | 54 | 0 | 1,117 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, leanix.net). The first result for “best enterprise architecture tool” is guides.visual-paradigm.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best enterprise architecture tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application portfolio management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade enterprise architecture tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best enterprise architecture tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an enterprise architecture tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which enterprise architecture tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LeanIXLeanIX, ServiceNow APMChangedLeanIX, Sparx EALeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architectagainst: ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, ServiceNow Enterprise Architectureno first choiceagainst: Bizzdesign HOPEX, ER/Studio, ServiceNow with EA Extensions, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Four alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, ER/Studio, Sparx Enterprise ArchitectTwo alternatives
Broadcom Clarity, Planview PortfoliosEight alternatives
Archi, Ardoq, Bizzdesign HOPEX, ER/Studio, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, The Essential ProjectOne alternative
AlfabetGPT-5.4 miniArdoq, SAP LeanIXServiceNow Application Portfolio ManagementChangedSparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectSAP LeanIXagainst: Sparx Enterprise Architectno first choiceagainst: ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture
Four alternatives
ADOIT, Bizzdesign Horizzon, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx SystemsThree alternatives
Ardoq, CAST Highlight, SAP LeanIXEight alternatives
Ardoq, BOC ADOIT, LeanIX, MEGA HOPEX, Orbus iServer, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureOne alternative
ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureGemini 3.5 FlashSAP LeanIXagainst: Sparx Systems EASAP LeanIXHeldArdoq, SAP LeanIXEssential CloudArdoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, LeanIXagainst: Alfabet, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Confluence, Excel, MEGA, PowerPoint, ServiceNow APM, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Software AG, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio
Four alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus InfinityThree alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, ServiceNow Application Portfolio ManagementFour alternatives
Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, Sparx SystemsFive alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Prolaborate, SAP LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectOne alternative
Avolution ABACUSPerplexity SonarSAP LeanIXLeanIXChangedno first choiceSparx Systems Enterprise Architectagainst: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, HOPEX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architectureno first choiceagainst: ADOIT, ARIS, Archi, Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, Miro, Planview Portfolios, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Spreadsheets, Unicom System Architect, Visio
Four alternatives
Ardoq, OrbusInfinity, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectTwo alternatives
Ardoq, ServiceNow APMNine alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity, Planview Enterprise Architecture, SAP LeanIX, Software AG Alfabet, Sparx Enterprise ArchitectOne alternative
SAP LeanIXGrok 4.20Ardoqagainst: Sparx Enterprise ArchitectSAP LeanIXChangedagainst: MEGA HOPEX, ONES.com, Software AG AlfabetArdoq, SAP LeanIXagainst: Sparx Enterprise ArchitectSparx Systems Enterprise Architectagainst: Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, Orbus Infinity, Planview PortfoliosArdoq, SAP LeanIXagainst: Draw.io, IBM Rational System Architect, Lucidchart, MEGA HOPEX, Miro, Orbus iServer, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio
Two alternatives
Bizzdesign Horizzon, SAP LeanIXFour alternatives
Ardoq, Orbus Software, Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow Application Portfolio Management (APM) or Strategic Portfolio ManagementFive alternatives
Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, Orbus Software, Software AGTwo alternatives
Ardoq, SAP LeanIXFour alternatives
Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureMistral SmallSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio ManagementChangedno first choiceSparx Enterprise Architectagainst: Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity, Planview Enterprise One, SAP LeanIXno first choiceagainst: LeanIX, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio
Three alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureTwo alternatives
ONES.com, Orbus SoftwareDeepSeek V4 FlashSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldagainst: MEGA HOPEXSAP LeanIXagainst: MEGA HOPEX, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureArdoqagainst: Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectArdoq, SAP LeanIXagainst: Software AG ARISagainst: Draw.io, Generis, IBM Rational System Architect, Lucidchart, MEGA HOPEX, Miro, Old SAP EAF, Oracle EAS, PowerPoint, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Visio
Four alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus SoftwareTwo alternatives
Ardoq, ServiceNow Application Portfolio ManagementFive alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectTwo alternatives
Essential Cloud, SAP LeanIXOne alternative
Bizzdesign HorizzonLlama 4 MaverickSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Excel, LeanIX, SharePoint, Visio
Four alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Faddom, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectQwen 3.7 FlashArdoq, SAP LeanIXArdoq, SAP LeanIXHeldagainst: ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureArdoq, SAP LeanIXArdoq, SAP LeanIXagainst: ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architectno first choiceagainst: Bizzdesign Horizzon, Draw.io, DynamiX, LeanIX, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, PowerPoint, Sparx Systems, ibrix
Three alternatives
Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, Spiceworks Ziff Davis / SavvyOps – Enterprise ArchitectFive alternatives
Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA International, Sparx Systems, erwinKimi K2Ardoq, Orbus Software, SAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXChangedArdoq, SAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXagainst: Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, Planview Enterprise One, ServiceNow EAno first choiceagainst: IBM Rational System Architect, MEGA HOPEX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
One alternative
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio ManagementFive alternatives
Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectTwo alternatives
Ardoq, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectGLM 4.7 FlashXSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldArdoqSAP LeanIXagainst: Sparx Enterprise Architectno first choiceagainst: ASG, Adaptive, Bizzdesign HOPEX, FEAMS, IBM Rational DOORS, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow EA, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Visio
Four alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, OrbusInfinity, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureTwo alternatives
Ardoq, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio ManagementSix alternatives
Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA, Orbus Infinity, Planview EA, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow EAOne alternative
ArdoqMiniMax M2.5SAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldno first choiceArdoq, SAP LeanIXagainst: Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx EAArdoq, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIXagainst: MEGA HOPEXagainst: LeanIX, MEGA HOPEX, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Two alternatives
Orbus Software, QualiWareTwo alternatives
Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow APMGPT-6 LunaSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldno first choiceArdoqno first choiceagainst: Excel, Orbus iServer, PowerPoint, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Visio
Three alternatives
Ardoq, OrbusInfinity, ServiceNow Enterprise ArchitectureTwo alternatives
Ardoq, ServiceNow APMEight alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, BOC ADOIT, Bizzdesign Horizzon, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectOne alternative
SAP LeanIXFour alternatives
Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, SAP LeanIXMuse Glimmer 30BSAP LeanIXSAP LeanIXHeldno first choiceArdoq, Essential Cloudno first choiceagainst: Archi, Draw.io, Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Miro, SharePoint, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Sway, Visio
One alternative
ArdoqOne alternative
ServiceNow APMNine alternatives
Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, BOC ADOIT, Bizzdesign Horizzon, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Enterprise ArchitectOne alternative
SAP LeanIXBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 21 | 97 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:02 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 22 | 102 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:21 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 20 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 1 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:46 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:06 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 24 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 4 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 3 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:57 | yes | 23 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:38 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:50 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 25 | 93 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:58 | yes | 19 | 107 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Avolution read as Avolution ABACUS
Avolution (ABACUS) read as Avolution ABACUS
BiZZdesign read as Bizzdesign Horizzon
Bizzdesign read as Bizzdesign Horizzon
Bizzdesign (HOPEX / Horizzon) read as Bizzdesign Horizzon
Bizzdesign (Horizzon) read as Bizzdesign Horizzon
Bizzdesign (incorporating HOPEX & Alfabet) read as Bizzdesign Horizzon
Orbus read as Orbus iServer
Planview read as Planview Portfolios
Planview (formerly Avande/Changepoint) read as Planview Portfolios
Planview (or Planview Enterprise One) read as Planview Portfolios
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture
ServiceNow (Strategic Portfolio Mgmt) read as ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture
Unresolved, counted raw
ASG
Adaptive
BOC Group ADOIT
DynamiX
Excalidraw
FEAMS
Generis
Horizzon
IBM Rational DOORS
Microsoft PowerPoint
Old SAP EAF
Oracle EAS
Planview EA
Planview Lean Portfolio Management
Progress OpenEdge
ServiceNow Application Portfolio Management (APM) or Strategic Portfolio Management
ServiceNow with EA Extensions
Sparx Systems EA
Spiceworks Ziff Davis / SavvyOps – Enterprise Architect
ibrix
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.